Search

The in-person workshop “Drug Dissolution in Oral Drug Absorption” was held on May 23–24, 2023, in Baltimore, MD, USA. The workshop was organized into lectures and breakout sessions. Three common topics that were re-visited by various lecturers were amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs), dissolution/permeation interplay, and in vitro methods to predict in vivo biopharmaceutics performance and risk. Topics that repeatedly surfaced across breakout sessions were the following: (1) meaning and assessment of “dissolved drug,” particularly of poorly water soluble drug in colloidal environments (e.g., fed conditions, ASDs); (2) potential limitations of a test that employs sink conditions for a poorly water soluble drug; (3) non-compendial methods (e.g., two-stage or multi-stage method, dissolution/permeation methods); (4) non-compendial conditions (e.g., apex vessels, non-sink conditions); and (5) potential benefit of having both a quality control method for batch release and a biopredictive/biorelevant method for biowaiver or bridging scenarios. An identified obstacle to non-compendial methods is the uncertainty of global regulatory acceptance of such methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Theoretically, the risk of food effects for extended-release (ER) products compared to IR products may be less because: (1) postprandial physiological changes are usually transient and last for 2–3 h only; and (2) the percentage of drug release from an ER product within the first 2–3 h post dose is usually small under both fasted and fed states. The major postprandial physiological changes that can affect oral absorption of ER drugs are delayed gastric emptying and prolonged intestinal transit. Oral absorption of ER drugs under fasted state mainly occurs in large intestine (colon and rectum) while the absorption of ER drugs under fed state occurs in both small and large intestines. We hypothesized that food effects for ER products are mainly caused by intestinal region-dependent absorption and food intake is more likely to increase rather than decrease the exposure of ER products due to a longer transit time and improved absorption in small intestine. For drugs with good absorption from large intestine, food effects on the area under the curve (AUC) of ER products are usually not expected. Our survey of oral drugs approved by the US FDA between 1998–2021 identified 136 oral ER drug products. Among the 136 ER drug products, 31, 6 and 99 products exhibited increased, decreased, and unchanged AUC under fed conditions, respectively. In general, when an ER product exhibits a fasted bioavailability (BA) relative to its corresponding immediate-release (IR) product between 80–125%, regardless the solubility or permeability of drug substances, substantial food effects on the AUC of ER product are generally not expected. If the fasted relative BA data are not available, a high in vitro permeability (i.e., Caco-2 or MDCK cell permeability comparable or higher than that of metoprolol) may inform no food effect on the AUC of an ER product of high-solubility (BCS class I and III) drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to assess how solubility and dissolution profile comparisons under different pH conditions can be used to predict gastric pH-mediated drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential. We collected information for new molecular entities (NMEs) approved from 2003 to 2019 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that had dedicated clinical DDI studies with acid-reducing agents (ARAs). Among these, 67 NMEs with solubility under different pHs and dissolution profiles generated in pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8 aqueous media were included for analysis. Similarity factor (f2) was used to compare dissolution profiles at different pHs for pH-mediated DDI prediction (e.g., f2<50 predicts positive DDI). Prediction accuracy was calculated based on the outcome comparison between predicted and observed DDIs. Based on dissolution profile comparisons and observed DDI data, weak base drugs (WBDs) (n = 49) showed 72.5% prediction accuracy under the fasted conditions, and 66.7% prediction accuracy under fed conditions. While using solubility and clinical dose for prediction, the prediction accuracy was 80% under fasted conditions and 66.7% under fed conditions, respectively. Comparison of dissolution profiles generated at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8 can be used to predict gastric pH-mediated DDI potential for WBDs. It demonstrated comparable prediction accuracy under both fasted and fed conditions when compared to the prediction using solubility and clinical dose. Furthermore, dissolution profile comparison could add an additional understanding of possible impact of pH change on the release behavior of the drug product. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In vivo drug dissolution kinetics of BCS Class 2a IR solid oral drug products remains largely unknown. An understanding to what extent the solubility influences in vivo dissolution is needed to design appropriate in vitro dissolution methods. In this study, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to investigate the in vivo dissolution of BCS Class 2a drugs based on numerical deconvolution analyses. The PK data were obtained from published literature or drug applications submitted to the FDA. It has been hypothesized that the in vivo drug dissolution rate would likely correlate to the solubility of NSAIDs in the media at gastrointestinal pH. Our findings show a short lag time of absorption (Tlag), comparable to the liquid gastric emptying time and independent of the solubility and formulation. In Vivo drug dissolution of NSAIDs was generally rapid and complete within the regular drug residence time in the small intestine while multi-phase absorption was observed in some subjects for all the NSAIDs. The comparisons of in vivo drug dissolution rate, which was characterized by in vivo dissolution half-life (Thalf), indicate that solubility has a minimal impact on in vivo drug dissolution rate for NSAIDs. Gastric emptying regulated by migrating motor complex (MMC) under fasted state most likely governs drug dissolution and absorption of NSAIDs. For BCS Class 2a IR solid oral drug products, large variability of gastric emptying and MMC as well as the strong driving force of intestinal absorption probably outweigh the impact of solubility on drug in vivo dissolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) absorption modeling and simulation is increasingly used as a tool in drug product development, not only in support of clinical pharmacology applications (e.g., drug-drug interaction, dose selection) but also from quality perspective, enhancing drug product understanding. This report provides a summary of the status and the application of PBPK absorption modeling and simulation in new drug application (NDA) submissions to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to support drug product quality (e.g., clinically relevant dissolution specifications, active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) particle size distribution specifications). During the 10 years from 2008 to 2018, a total of 24 NDA submissions included the use of PBPK absorption modeling and simulations for biopharmaceutics-related assessment. In these submissions, PBPK absorption modeling and simulation served as an impactful tool in establishing the relationship of critical quality attributes (CQAs) including formulation variables, specifically in vitro dissolution, to the in vivo performance. This article also summarizes common practices in PBPK approaches and proposes future directions for the use of PBPK absorption modeling and simulation in drug product quality assessment. Graphical abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bioequivalence (BE) studies support the approval and clinical use of both new drug and generic drug products. Virtual BE studies have been conducted using physiologically based pharmacokinetic absorption models (PBPK AMs) to aid the evaluations of generic drug products. The aim of the current study is to determine the dissolution boundary for maintaining BE between the test and reference oseltamivir phosphate (OP) drug products using the PBPK AM–based virtual BE studies in adults and pediatrics. The adult PBPK AM for OP and its metabolite oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) are developed and verified/validated using intravenous and oral data from multiple generic OP products. The pediatric PBPK AM is extrapolated from the adult PBPK AM. The virtual BE analysis is conducted using simulated PK profiles from the reference products and the generic products with theoretical dissolution profiles as inputs. Results indicate that the generic products with 10% slower dissolution profile than the pivotal reference bio-batch could still maintain BE to the reference in adults. In contrast, a stringent trend of dissolution boundary is observed for pediatrics (6% slower for adolescents, 4% slower for 0–2-month neonates) to maintain BE. This study addresses the important applications of PBPK AM in evaluating BE in different age populations, mitigating risk of formulation/batch changes, and providing a quantitative basis for setting clinically relevant dissolution specifications for OP and OC in both adults and pediatrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This publication summarizes the proceedings and key outcomes of the first day ("Day 1") of the 3-day workshop on "Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Product Development." The overall aims of the workshop were to foster a productive dialog between industry and regulatory agencies and to discuss current strategies toward the development and implementation of clinically relevant dissolution specifications as an integral part of enhanced drug product understanding and effective drug product life-cycle management. The Day 1 podium presentations covered existing challenges and concerns for implementing highly valuable, yet often unique and novel experimental dissolution setups as quality control tools. In addition, several podium presentations highlighted opportunities to replace conventional dissolution testing with surrogate test methods to enable robust drug product and process understanding within the context of quality by design (QbD), new manufacturing technologies, and real-time release testing (RTRT). The topics covered on Day 1 laid the foundation for subsequent discussions which focused on the challenges related to establishing an in vitro-in vivo link and approaches for establishing clinically relevant drug product specifications which are becoming an expectation in regulatory submissions. Clarification of dissolution-related terminology used inconsistently among the scientific community, and the purpose of various testing approaches were key discussion topics of the Day 1 breakout sessions. The outcome of these discussions along with creative ways to overcome challenges related to bridging "exploratory dissolution approaches" with methods suitable for end-product control testing are captured within this report. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This publication summarizes the proceedings of day 3 of a 3-day workshop on “Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Product Development.” Specifically, this publication discusses the current approaches in building clinical relevance into drug product development for solid oral dosage forms, along with challenges that both industry and regulatory agencies are facing in setting clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS) as presented at the workshop. The concept of clinical relevance is a multidisciplinary effort which implies an understanding of the relationship between the critical quality attributes (CQAs) and their impact on predetermined clinical outcomes. Developing this level of understanding, in many cases, requires introducing deliberate but meaningful variations into the critical material attributes (CMAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs) to establish a relationship between the resulting in vitro dissolution/release profiles and in vivo PK performance, a surrogate for clinical outcomes. Alternatively, with the intention of improving the efficiency of the drug product development process by limiting the burden of conducting in vivo studies, this understanding can be either built, or at least enhanced, through in silico efforts, such as IVIVC and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) absorption modeling and simulation (M&S). These approaches enable dissolution testing to establish safe boundaries and reject drug product batches falling outside of the established safe range (e.g., due to inadequate in vivo performance) enabling the method to become clinically relevant. Ultimately, these efforts contribute towards patient-centric drug product development and allow regulatory flexibility throughout the lifecycle of the drug product. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]