Search

This paper discusses the juridical implications of the appointment of a Juvenile Judge whose diversion conference implementation does not meet the requirements for diversion. It is structured based on doctrinal research findings, employing a legislative approach and conceptual analysis utilizing teleological interpretation. The research findings indicate that the juridical implications of appointing a Juvenile Judge whose diversion conference implementation does not meet the requirements for diversion lie in the action of the Juvenile Judge in prescribing diversion despite not meeting the mandatory diversion provisions, which, when solely considered from a grammatical interpretation of the Juvenile Justice Law, constitutes an ultra petite action. However, when viewed from a teleological interpretation, the Juvenile Judge's action aligns with the purpose of the Juvenile Justice Law, namely to keep children away from judicial processes to avoid stigmatization. Moreover, even if the judge takes an ultra-petite action, it is based on the principle of the best interests of the child, as long as the contents of the diversion agreement do not contradict the Law, religion, local community norms, morality, or contain elements that the child cannot implement, or exhibit lousy faith, then the Chief Judge should still issue a Decree on the Diversion Agreement.

This paper examines the inclusion of verbally displaying sexual acts (commonly known as catcalling) within the framework of criminal law in Indonesia. It also analyzes the legal protections afforded to victims of such actions under Law No 12 of 2022 concerning Crimes of Sexual Violence (TPKS Law). Verbal sexual concealment, or catcalling, involves the non-physical expression of sexual acts directed at an individual's body, sexual desires, and/or reproductive organs. This undermines the person's dignity based on their sexuality and/or modesty. Under the TPKS Law, victims of verbal sexual harassment, or catcalling, are granted specific legal protections. These include the right to be shielded from acts of violence and the right to be free from any treatment that undermines their dignity. These protective measures encompass the fulfilment of ownership and the provision of assistance to ensure the victims' sense of security. The LPSK or other relevant institutions are responsible for carrying out these protective measures by the requirements outlined in the law.