Search

ObjectiveTo describe the anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) efficacy, HBeAg serologic changes, HBV perinatal transmission, and safety in pregnant women who are living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV co-infection who were randomized to various antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens.MethodsThe PROMISE (Promoting Maternal and Infant Survival Everywhere) trial was a multicenter randomized trial for ART-naive pregnant women with HIV infection. Women with HIV and HBV co-infection at 14 or more weeks of gestation were randomized to one of three ART arms: one without HBV treatment (group 1) and two HBV treatment arms with single (group 2) or dual anti-HBV activity (group 3). The primary HBV outcome was HBV viral load antepartum change from baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks; safety assessments included alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, and anemia (hemoglobin less than 10 g/dL). Primary comparison was for the HBV-active treatment arms. Pairwise comparisons applied t test and the Fisher exact tests.ResultsOf 3,543 women, 3.9% were HBsAg-positive; 42 were randomized to group 1, 48 to group 2, and 48 to group 3. Median gestational age at enrollment was 27 weeks. Among HBV-viremic women, mean antepartum HBV viral load change at week 8 was -0.26 log 10 international units/mL in group 1, -1.86 in group 2, and -1.89 in group 3. In those who were HBeAg-positive, HBeAg loss occurred in 44.4% at delivery. Two perinatal HBV transmissions occurred in group 2. During the antepartum period, one woman (2.4%) in group 1 had grade 3 or 4 ALT or AST elevations, two women (4.2%) in group 2, and three women (6.3%) in group 3.ConclusionOver a short period of time, HBV DNA suppression was not different with one or two HBV-active agents. HbeAg loss occurred in a substantial proportion of participants. Perinatal transmission of HBV infection was low. Hepatitis B virus-active ART was well-tolerated in pregnancy, with few grade 3 or 4 ALT or AST elevations.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01061151.

BackgroundThere are limited data on the impact of antenatal antiretroviral regimens (ARV) on pregnancy and infant outcomes in HIV/HBV coinfection. We compared outcomes among 3 antenatal antiretroviral regimens for pregnant women with HIV/HBV.MethodsThe PROMISE study enrolled ARV-naive pregnant women with HIV. Women with HBV were randomized to (no anti-HBV)-zidovudine (ZDV) + intrapartum nevirapine and 1 week of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF-FTC); (3TC)-3TC + ZDV + LPV/r; or (FTC-TDF)-FTC + TDF + LPV/r. Pairwise group comparisons were performed with Fisher exact, t , or log rank tests. Adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) was a composite of low birth weight, preterm delivery, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, or congenital anomaly.ResultsOf 138 women with HIV/HBV, 42, 48, and 48 were analyzed in the no anti-HBV, 3TC, and FTC-TDF arms. Median age was 27 years. APOs trended lower in the no anti-HBV (26%) vs 3TC (38%), and FTC-TDF arms (35%), P ≥ 0.25). More infant deaths occurred among the FTC-TDF [6 (13%)] vs no anti-HBV [2 (5%)] and 3TC [3 (7%)] arms. There were no differences in time-to-death, HIV-free survival, birth or one-year WHO Z-score length-for-age, and head circumference. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) was associated with an increased risk of APO, 48% vs 27% (odds ratio 2.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.19 to 6.67, post hoc ).ConclusionWith HBV/HIV coinfection, the risk of an APO was increased with maternal ARV compared with ZDV alone, although the differences were not statistically significant. Maternal HBeAg was associated with a significantly increased risk of APO. Infant mortality was highest with FTC + TDF + LPV/r. Early assessment of HBeAg could assist in identifying high-risk pregnancies for close monitoring.

ObjectiveWe aimed to determine if the dapivirine vaginal ring and the ring device alone (flexible silicone matrix polymer) was associated with the development of cervical cytology abnormalities.DesignSecondary analysis comparing cervical cytology results between two randomized controlled microbicide trials (MTN-020/ASPIRE and MTN-003/VOICE).MethodsData from ASPIRE, a phase III, placebo-controlled trial of the dapivirine vaginal ring, were used in this analysis. Cervical cytology smears were evaluated at baseline and at the final visit with product use. We compared cytology results between women randomized to dapivirine versus placebo vaginal ring. We further assessed for the effect of the vaginal ring device on cervical cytology by comparing results with data from the oral placebo arm of VOICE, a prior HIV-1 prevention trial conducted in a similar population.ResultsCervical cytology results for 2394 women from ASPIRE (1197 per study arm) were used in this analysis; median time between baseline and final visit with product use was 22.1 months. Cytology smear findings were comparable between dapivirine and placebo vaginal ring arms: at final visit, normal: 90.6 versus 91.5%, ASC-US//LSIL: 7.8 versus 7.4%, ASC-H/HSIL/AGC/AGC-favor neoplastic: 1.7 versus 1.1%, P = 0.44. Cytology data from VOICE had findings (normal: 87.8%, ASC-US/LSIL: 9.8%, ASC-H/HSIL/AGC/AGC-favor neoplastic: 2.4%) comparable with that of both dapivirine (P = 0.93) and placebo vaginal ring arms (P = 0.24).ConclusionThese findings indicate that neither use of the dapivirine vaginal ring nor the vaginal ring device alone, over a period of 2 years, is associated with development of cervical cytology abnormalities that could lead to precancerous or cancerous lesions.