1. Validity of Online Versus In-Clinic Self-Reported Everyday Cognition Scale
- Author
-
Howell, Taylor, Neuhaus, J, Glymour, MM, Weiner, MW, and Nosheny, RL
- Subjects
Biological Psychology ,Cognitive and Computational Psychology ,Psychology ,Aging ,Acquired Cognitive Impairment ,Alzheimer's Disease ,Brain Disorders ,Neurosciences ,Dementia ,Behavioral and Social Science ,Neurodegenerative ,Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) ,Clinical Research ,Neurological ,Alzheimer Disease ,Cognition ,Cognitive Dysfunction ,Humans ,Neuropsychological Tests ,Reproducibility of Results ,Self Report ,online research registry ,Everyday cognition ,Biological psychology ,Cognitive and computational psychology - Abstract
BackgroundOnline cognitive assessments are alternatives to in-clinic assessments.ObjectivesWe evaluated the relationship between online and in-clinic self-reported Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog).MethodsIn 94 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and Brain Health Registry (ADNI-BHR) participants, we estimated associations between online and in-clinic Everyday Cognition using Bland-Altman plots and regression. In 472 ADNI participants, we estimated reliability of in-clinic Everyday Cognition completed six months apart using Bland-Altman plots and regression.ResultsOnline Everyday Cognition associations: Mean difference was 0.11 (95% limits of agreement: -0.41 to 0.64). In-clinic Everyday Cognition score increased by 0.81 for each online Everyday Cognition score unit increase (R2=0.60). In-clinic Everyday Cognition reliability: Mean difference was 0.01 (95% limits of agreement: -0.61 to 0.62). In-clinic Everyday Cognition score at enrollment increased by 0.79 for each in-clinic Everyday Cognition score unit increase at six months (R2=0.61).ConclusionOnline Everyday Cognition closely corresponded with in-clinic Everyday Cognition, supporting validity of using online cognitive assessments to more efficiently facilitate Alzheimer's disease research.
- Published
- 2022