Search

The coexistence of multiple structural phases and field induced short-range to long-range order transition in ferroelectric materials, leads to a strong electrocaloric effect (ECE) and electrical energy storage density (Wrec) in the vicinity of ferroelectric to non-ergodic phase transition in NKBT ceramic. Structural analysis using X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and TEM studies ascertained the coexistence of tetragonal (P4mm) and rhombohedral (R3c) phases. Dielectric study has revealed a critical slowing down of polar domain dynamics below a diffuse phase transition. Present investigation reports ECE in lead-free (Na0.8K0.2)0.5Bi0.5TiO3 (NKBT) ceramic by direct and indirect methods, which confirm the multifunctional nature of NKBT and its usefulness for applications in refrigeration and energy storage. A direct method of EC measurement in NKBT ceramic exhibits significant adiabatic temperature change ({\Delta}T) ~ 1.10 K and electrocaloric strength ({\xi}) ~ 0.55 Kmm/kV near the ferroelectric to non-ergodic phase transition at an external applied field of 20 kV/cm. A highest recoverable energy (Wrec) ~ 0.78 J/cm3 and electrical storage efficiency ({\eta}) ~ 86% are achieved at 423 K and an applied field of 20 kV/cm. This behavior is ascribed to the delicate balance between the field induced order-disordered transition and the thermal energy needed to disrupt field induced co-operative interaction., Comment: Need to modify

Role of the Coulomb interaction, mean fissility, mass asymmetry, and charge asymmetry parameters on the synthesis of heavy and superheavy elements has been examined with respect to the deformation parameters of the projectile and target nuclei explicitly in light of the experimental results. The observed facts are classified into four categories and are then used to study several unsuccessful as well as planned reactions to synthesize the new superheavy elements $Z= 119, 120$. Concrete inference is too difficult to draw from these results because of excessive deviations in evaporation residue cross-section data. It is found that the arbitrary choice of excitation energy for the experiments studied was the root cause of such large deviations. Such a complex issue can be resolved well by theoretical excitation function studies using the advanced statistical model or the dinuclear system model and choosing the excitation energy corresponding to the energy where the excitation function curve shows the maximum. We believe this method may help us to predict whether the estimated evaporation residue cross-section can be measurable within the experimental limit of the existing facilities for the future reactions planned., Comment: 5 figures

Besides right choice of entrance channel, selection of optimal beam energies for synthesis of superheavy elements plays a crucial role. A thorough investigation with the advanced statistical and dinuclear system models on all the experiments performed for the synthesis of the successful superheavy elements Z=104-118 and failed superheavy elements Z=119-120 leads us to infer that improper choice of the beam energies may be responsible for too low production cross sections to measure and thus the cause for the debacle. We have predicted the optimal beam energies to obtain the maximum production cross sections for all the reactions used for the superheavy elements Z=104-120. Hope exploitation of these predictions may be on the cards soon to extend the periodic table for the eighth period, Comment: 5 figures

Coulomb fission mechanism may take place if the maximum Coulomb-excitation energy transfer in a reaction exceeds the fission barrier of either the projectile or target. This condition is satisfied by all the reactions used for the earlier blocking measurements except one reaction 208 Pb + Natural Ge crystal, where the measured timescale was below the measuring limit of the blocking measurements < 1 as. Hence, inclusion of the Coulomb fission in the data analysis of the blocking experiments leads us to interpret that the measured time longer than a few attoseconds (about 2-2.5 as) is nothing but belonging to the Coulomb fission timescale and shorter than 1 as are due to the quasifission. Consequently, this finding resolves the critical discrepancies between the fission timescale measurements using the nuclear and blocking techniques. This, in turn, validates the fact that the quasifission timescale is indeed of the order of zeptoseconds in accordance with the nuclear experiments and theories. It thus provides a radical input in understanding the reaction mechanism for heavy element formation via fusion evaporation processes, Comment: 2 figures