Search

A novel method for fast and high-resolution metabolic imaging, called ECcentric Circle ENcoding TRajectorIes for Compressed sensing (ECCENTRIC), has been developed and implemented at 7 Tesla MRI. ECCENTRIC is a non-Cartesian spatial-spectral encoding method optimized to accelerate magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) with high signal-to-noise at ultra-high field. The approach provides flexible and random ($k,t$) sampling without temporal interleaving to improve spatial response function and spectral quality. ECCENTRIC needs low gradient amplitudes and slew-rates that reduces electrical, mechanical and thermal stress of the scanner hardware, and is robust to timing imperfection and eddy-current delays. Combined with a model-based low-rank reconstruction, this approach enables simultaneous imaging of up to 14 metabolites over the whole-brain at 2-3mm isotropic resolution in 4-10 minutes. In healthy volunteers ECCENTRIC demonstrated unprecedented spatial mapping of fine structural details of human brain neurochemistry. This innovative tool introduces a novel approach to neuroscience, providing new insights into the exploration of brain activity and physiology., Comment: 21 pages, 6 figures,3 tables, 4 pages supplementary material

Subject movement during the magnetic resonance examination is inevitable and causes not only image artefacts but also deteriorates the homogeneity of the main magnetic field (B0), which is a prerequisite for high quality data. Thus, characterization of changes to B0, e.g. induced by patient movement, is important for MR applications that are prone to B0 inhomogeneities. We propose a deep learning based method to predict such changes within the brain from the change of the head position to facilitate retrospective or even real-time correction. A 3D U-net was trained on in vivo brain 7T MRI data. The input consisted of B0 maps and anatomical images at an initial position, and anatomical images at a different head position (obtained by applying a rigid-body transformation on the initial anatomical image). The output consisted of B0 maps at the new head positions. We further fine-tuned the network weights to each subject by measuring a limited number of head positions of the given subject, and trained the U-net with these data. Our approach was compared to established dynamic B0 field mapping via interleaved navigators, which suffer from limited spatial resolution and the need for undesirable sequence modifications. Qualitative and quantitative comparison showed similar performance between an interleaved navigator-equivalent method and proposed method. We therefore conclude that it is feasible to predict B0 maps from rigid subject movement and, when combined with external tracking hardware, this information could be used to improve the quality of magnetic resonance acquisitions without the use of navigators., Comment: 9 pages, 6 figures

This paper investigates the correlation between magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) in glioma patients by comparing neuro-oncological markers obtained from MRSI to T1/T2 maps from MRF. Data from 12 consenting patients with gliomas were analyzed by defining hotspots for T1, T2 and various metabolic ratios, and comparing them using S{\o}rensen-Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSCs) and the distances between their centers of intensity (COIDs). Median DSCs between MRF and the tumor segmentation were 0.73 (T1) and 0.79 (T2). The DSCs between MRSI and MRF were highest for Gln/tNAA (T1: 0.75, T2: 0.80, tumor: 0.78), followed by Gly/tNAA (T1: 0.57, T2: 0.62, tumor: 0.54) and tCho/tNAA (T1: 0.61, T2: 0.58, tumor: 0.45). The median values in the tumor hotspot were T1=1724 ms, T2=86 ms, Gln/tNAA=0.61, Gly/tNAA=0.28, Ins/tNAA=1.15, and tCho/tNAA=0.48, and, in the peritumoral region, were T1=1756 ms, T2=102ms, Gln/tNAA=0.38, Gly/tNAA=0.20, Ins/tNAA=1.06, and tCho/tNAA=0.38, and, in the NAWM, were T1=950 ms, T2=43 ms, Gln/tNAA=0.16, Gly/tNAA=0.07, Ins/tNAA=0.54, and tCho/tNAA=0.20. The results of this study constitute the first comparison of 7T MRSI and 3T MRF, showing a good correspondence between these methods., Comment: Includes 3 tables, 6 figures, 3 supplementary tables, and 4 supplementary figures