Search

The capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have been applied in expert systems across various domains, providing new opportunities for AI in Education. Educational interactions involve a cyclical exchange between teachers and students. Current research predominantly focuses on using LLMs to simulate teachers, leveraging their expertise to enhance student learning outcomes. However, the simulation of students, which could improve teachers' instructional skills, has received insufficient attention due to the challenges of modeling and evaluating virtual students. This research asks: Can LLMs be utilized to develop virtual student agents that mimic human-like behavior and individual variability? Unlike expert systems focusing on knowledge delivery, virtual students must replicate learning difficulties, emotional responses, and linguistic uncertainties. These traits present significant challenges in both modeling and evaluation. To address these issues, this study focuses on language learning as a context for modeling virtual student agents. We propose a novel AI4Education framework, called SOE (Scene-Object-Evaluation), to systematically construct LVSA (LLM-based Virtual Student Agents). By curating a dataset of personalized teacher-student interactions with various personality traits, question types, and learning stages, and fine-tuning LLMs using LoRA, we conduct multi-dimensional evaluation experiments. Specifically, we: (1) develop a theoretical framework for generating LVSA; (2) integrate human subjective evaluation metrics into GPT-4 assessments, demonstrating a strong correlation between human evaluators and GPT-4 in judging LVSA authenticity; and (3) validate that LLMs can generate human-like, personalized virtual student agents in educational contexts, laying a foundation for future applications in pre-service teacher training and multi-agent simulation environments.

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have made significant strides in addressing complex video tasks, sparking researchers' interest in their human-like multimodal understanding capabilities. Video description serves as a fundamental task for evaluating video comprehension, necessitating a deep understanding of spatial and temporal dynamics, which presents challenges for both humans and machines. Thus, investigating whether LVLMs can describe videos as comprehensively as humans (through reasonable human-machine comparisons using video captioning as a proxy task) will enhance our understanding and application of these models. However, current benchmarks for video comprehension have notable limitations, including short video durations, brief annotations, and reliance on a single annotator's perspective. These factors hinder a comprehensive assessment of LVLMs' ability to understand complex, lengthy videos and prevent the establishment of a robust human baseline that accurately reflects human video comprehension capabilities. To address these issues, we propose a novel benchmark, FIOVA (Five In One Video Annotations), designed to evaluate the differences between LVLMs and human understanding more comprehensively. FIOVA includes 3,002 long video sequences (averaging 33.6 seconds) that cover diverse scenarios with complex spatiotemporal relationships. Each video is annotated by five distinct annotators, capturing a wide range of perspectives and resulting in captions that are 4-15 times longer than existing benchmarks, thereby establishing a robust baseline that represents human understanding comprehensively for the first time in video description tasks. Using the FIOVA benchmark, we conducted an in-depth evaluation of six state-of-the-art LVLMs, comparing their performance with humans. More detailed information can be found at https://huuuuusy.github.io/fiova/.

Multi-Task Evolutionary Optimization (MTEO), an important field focusing on addressing complex problems through optimizing multiple tasks simultaneously, has attracted much attention. While MTEO has been primarily focusing on task similarity, there remains a hugely untapped potential in harnessing the shared characteristics between different domains to enhance evolutionary optimization. For example, real-world complex systems usually share the same characteristics, such as the power-law rule, small-world property, and community structure, thus making it possible to transfer solutions optimized in one system to another to facilitate the optimization. Drawing inspiration from this observation of shared characteristics within complex systems, we set out to extend MTEO to a novel framework - multi-domain evolutionary optimization (MDEO). To examine the performance of the proposed MDEO, we utilize a challenging combinatorial problem of great security concern - community deception in complex networks as the optimization task. To achieve MDEO, we propose a community-based measurement of graph similarity to manage the knowledge transfer among domains. Furthermore, we develop a graph representation-based network alignment model that serves as the conduit for effectively transferring solutions between different domains. Moreover, we devise a self-adaptive mechanism to determine the number of transferred solutions from different domains and introduce a novel mutation operator based on the learned mapping to facilitate the utilization of knowledge from other domains. Experiments on eight real-world networks of different domains demonstrate MDEO superiority in efficacy compared to classical evolutionary optimization. Simulations of attacks on the community validate the effectiveness of the proposed MDEO in safeguarding community security.

The Random Permutation Set (RPS) is a new type of set proposed recently, which can be regarded as the generalization of evidence theory. To measure the uncertainty of RPS, the entropy of RPS and its corresponding maximum entropy have been proposed. Exploring the maximum entropy provides a possible way of understanding the physical meaning of RPS. In this paper, a new concept, the envelope of entropy function, is defined. In addition, the limit of the envelope of RPS entropy is derived and proved. Compared with the existing method, the computational complexity of the proposed method to calculate the envelope of RPS entropy decreases greatly. The result shows that when $N \to \infty$, the limit form of the envelope of the entropy of RPS converges to $e \times (N!)^2$, which is highly connected to the constant $e$ and factorial. Finally, numerical examples validate the efficiency and conciseness of the proposed envelope, which provides a new insight into the maximum entropy function., Comment: 22 pages, 5 figures

The co-evolution of economic and ecological activities represents one of the fundamental challenges in the realm of sustainable development. This study on the word trends in mainstream newspapers from the UK and China reveals that both early-industrialised countries and latecomers follow three modes of economic and ecological co-evolution. First, both economic and ecological words demonstrate an S-shaped growth trajectory, and the mode underscores the importance of information propagation, whilst also highlighting the crucial role of self-organisation in the accept society. Second, the co-occurrence of these two type words exhibits a Z-shaped relationship: for two-thirds of the observed period, they display synergistic interactions, while the remaining time shows trade-offs. Lastly, the words related to ecological degradation follow M-shaped trajectories in parallel with economic growth, suggesting periodic disruptions and reconstructions in their interrelationships. Our findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the co-evolutionary mechanisms that govern collective behaviours in human society.

Fractal plays an important role in nonlinear science. The most important parameter to model fractal is fractal dimension. Existing information dimension can calculate the dimension of probability distribution. However, given a mass function which is the generalization of probability distribution, how to determine its fractal dimension is still an open problem of immense interest. The main contribution of this work is to propose an information fractal dimension of mass function. Numerical examples are illustrated to show the effectiveness of our proposed dimension. We discover an important property in that the dimension of mass function with the maximum Deng entropy is $\frac{ln3}{ln2}\approx 1.585$, which is the well-known fractal dimension of Sierpi\'nski triangle.

Dormancy is a costly adaptive strategy that is widespread among living organisms inhabiting diverse environments. We explore mathematical models of predator-prey systems, in order to assess the impact of prey dormancy on the competition between two types of prey, a perennially active (PA) and capable of entering dormancy (dormitive). Both the active form and the dormant form of the dormitive prey are individually at a disadvantage compared to the PA prey and would go extinct due to their low growth rate, energy waste on the production of dormant prey, and inability of the latter to grow autonomously. However, the dormitive prey can paradoxically outcompete the PA prey with superior traits and even cause its extinction by alternating between the two losing strategies. This outcome recapitulates the game-theoretic Parrondo's paradox, where two losing strategies combine to achieve a winning outcome. We observed higher fitness of the dormitive prey in rich environments because a large predator population in a rich environment cannot be supported by the prey without adopting an evasive strategy, that is, dormancy. In such environments, populations experience large-scale fluctuations, which can be survived by dormitive but not by PA prey. Dormancy of the prey appears to be a natural evolutionary response to self-destructive over-predation that stabilizes evolving predator-prey systems through Parrondo's paradox.

Physarum solver, also called the physarum polycephalum inspired algorithm (PPA), is a newly developed bio-inspired algorithm that has an inherent ability to find the shortest path in a given graph. Recent research has proposed methods to develop this algorithm further by accelerating the original PPA (OPPA)'s path-finding process. However, when does the PPA ascertain that the shortest path has been found? Is there a point after which the PPA could distinguish the shortest path from other paths? By innovatively proposing the concept of the dominant path (D-Path), the exact moment, named the transition point (T-Point), when the PPA finds the shortest path can be identified. Based on the D-Path and T-Point, a newly accelerated PPA named OPPA-D using the proposed termination criterion is developed which is superior to all other baseline algorithms according to the experiments conducted in this paper. The validity and the superiority of the proposed termination criterion is also demonstrated. Furthermore, an evaluation method is proposed to provide new insights for the comparison of different accelerated OPPAs. The breakthrough of this paper lies in using D-path and T-point to terminate the OPPA. The novel termination criterion reveals the actual performance of this OPPA. This OPPA is the fastest algorithm, outperforming some so-called accelerated OPPAs. Furthermore, we explain why some existing works inappropriately claim to be accelerated algorithms is in fact a product of inappropriate termination criterion, thus giving rise to the illusion that the method is accelerated.

The identification of important nodes in complex networks is an area of exciting growth due to its applications across various disciplines like disease controlling, community finding, data mining, network system controlling, just to name a few. Many measures have thus been proposed to date, and these measures are either based on the locality of nodes or the global nature of the network. These measures typically use distance based on the concept of traditional Euclidean Distance, which only focus on the local static geographic distance between nodes but ignore the interaction between nodes in real-world networks. However, a variety of factors should be considered for the purpose of identifying influential nodes, such as degree, edge, direction and weight. Some methods based on evidence theory have also been proposed. In this paper, we have proposed an original and novel gravity model with effective distance for identifying influential nodes based on information fusion and multi-level processing. Our method is able to comprehensively consider the global and local information of the complex network, and also utilize the effective distance to replace the Euclidean Distance. This allows us to fully consider the complex topological structure of the real network, as well as the dynamic interaction information between nodes. In order to validate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we have utilized the susceptible infected (SI) model to carry out a variety of simulations on eight different real-world networks using six existing well-known methods. The experimental results indicate the reasonableness and effectiveness of our proposed method.

Physarum polycephalum inspired algorithm (PPA), also known as the Physarum Solver, has attracted great attention. By modelling real-world problems into a graph with network flow and adopting proper equations to calculate the distance between the nodes in the graph, PPA could be used to solve system optimization problems or user equilibrium problems. However, some problems such as the maximum flow (MF) problem, minimum-cost-maximum-flow (MCMF) problem, and link-capacitated traffic assignment problem (CTAP), require the flow flowing through links to follow capacity constraints. Motivated by the lack of related PPA-based research, a novel framework, the capacitated physarum polycephalum inspired algorithm (CPPA), is proposed to allow capacity constraints toward link flow in the PPA. To prove the validity of the CPPA, we developed three applications of the CPPA, i.e., the CPPA for the MF problem (CPPA-MF), the CPPA for the MCFC problem, and the CPPA for the link-capacitated traffic assignment problem (CPPA-CTAP). In the experiments, all the applications of the CPPA solve the problems successfully. Some of them demonstrate efficiency compared to the baseline algorithms. The experimental results prove the validation of using the CPPA framework to control link flow in the PPA is valid. The CPPA is also very robust and easy to implement since it could be successfully applied in three different scenarios. The proposed method shows that: having the ability to control the maximum among flow flowing through links in the PPA, the CPPA could tackle more complex real-world problems in the future.

The dynamics of city's spatial structures are determined by the coupling of functional components (such as restaurants and shops) and human beings within the city. Yet, there still lacks mechanism models to quantify the spatial distribution of functional components. Here, we establish a gradient model to simulate the density curves of multiple types of components based on the equilibria of gravitational and repulsive forces along the urban-rural gradient. The forces from city center to components are determined by both the city's attributes (land rent, population and people's environmental preferences) and the components attributes (supply capacity, product transportability and environmental impacts). The simulation for the distribution curves of 22 types of components on the urban-rural gradient are a good fit for the real-world data in cities. Based on the 4 typical types of components, the model reveals a bottom-up self-organizing mechanism that is, the patterns in city development are determined by the economic, ecological, and social attributes of both cities and components. Based on the mechanism, we predict the distribution curves of many types of components along with the development of cities. The model provides a general tool for analyzing the distribution of objects on the gradients., Comment: 32 pages, 4 figures

The Parrondo's paradox is a counterintuitive phenomenon in which individually losing strategies, canonically termed game A and game B, are combined to produce winning outcomes. In this paper, a co-evolution of game dynamics and network structure is adopted to study adaptability and survivability in multi-agent dynamics. The model includes action A, representing a rewiring process on the network, and a two-branch game B, representing redistributive interactions between agents. Simulation results indicate that stochastically mixing action A and game B can produce enhanced, and even winning outcomes, despite gameB being individually losing. In other words, a Parrondo-type paradox can be achieved, but unlike canonical variants, the source of agitation is provided by passive network evolution instead of an active second game. The underlying paradoxical mechanism is analyzed, revealing that the rewiring process drives a topology shift from initial regular lattices towards scale-free characteristics, and enables exploitative behavior that grants enhanced access to the favourable branch of game B., Comment: 15 pages, 9 figures

Previously, we developed a population model incorporating the Allee effect and periodic environmental fluctuations, in which organisms alternate between nomadic and colonial behaviours. This switching strategy is regulated by biological clocks and the abundance of environmental resources, and can lead to population persistence despite both behaviours being individually losing. In the present study, we consider stochastic noise models in place of the original periodic ones, thereby allowing a wider range of environmental fluctuations to be modelled. The theoretical framework is generalized to account for resource depletion by both nomadic and colonial sub-populations, and an ecologically realistic population size-dependent switching scheme is proposed. We demonstrate the robustness of the modified switching scheme to stochastic noise, and we also present the intriguing possibility of consecutive subsidence-recovery cycles within the resulting population dynamics. Our results have relevance in biological and physical systems.

How do movements and coalitions which engage with multiple social issues succeed in cross-issue solidarity, and when do they instead become fragmented? To address this, the mechanisms of cross-issue interaction have to be understood. Prior work on opinion dynamics and political disagreement has focused on single-issue consensus and polarization. Inspired by practices of cross-issue movement building, we have developed a general model of multi-issue opinion dynamics where agreement on one issue can promote greater inclusivity in discussing other issues, thereby avoiding the pitfalls of exclusivist interaction, where individuals engage only if they agree sufficiently on every issue considered. Our model shows that as more issues come into play, consensus and solidarity can only be maintained if inclusivity towards differing positions is increased. We further investigate whether greater inclusivity and compromise across issues lead people towards or away from normative truth, thereby addressing concerns about the non-ideal nature of political consensus.