Search

Studying racial bias in policing is a critically important problem, but one that comes with a number of inherent difficulties due to the nature of the available data. In this manuscript we tackle multiple key issues in the causal analysis of racial bias in policing. First, we formalize race and place policing, the idea that individuals of one race are policed differently when they are in neighborhoods primarily made up of individuals of other races. We develop an estimand to study this question rigorously, show the assumptions necessary for causal identification, and develop sensitivity analyses to assess robustness to violations of key assumptions. Additionally, we investigate difficulties with existing estimands targeting racial bias in policing. We show for these estimands, and the estimands developed in this manuscript, that estimation can benefit from incorporating mobility data into analyses. We apply these ideas to a study in New York City, where we find a large amount of racial bias, as well as race and place policing, and that these findings are robust to large violations of untestable assumptions. We additionally show that mobility data can make substantial impacts on the resulting estimates, suggesting it should be used whenever possible in subsequent studies.

In causal inference studies, interest often lies in understanding the mechanisms through which a treatment affects an outcome. One approach is principal stratification (PS), which introduces well-defined causal effects in the presence of confounded post-treatment variables, or mediators, and clearly defines the assumptions for identification and estimation of those effects. The goal of this paper is to extend the PS framework to studies with continuous treatments and continuous post-treatment variables, which introduces a number of unique challenges both in terms of defining causal effects and performing inference. This manuscript provides three key methodological contributions: 1) we introduce novel principal estimands for continuous treatments that provide valuable insights into different causal mechanisms, 2) we utilize Bayesian nonparametric approaches to model the joint distribution of the potential mediating variables based on both Gaussian processes and Dirichlet process mixtures to ensure our approach is robust to model misspecification, and 3) we provide theoretical and numerical justification for utilizing a model for the potential outcomes to identify the joint distribution of the potential mediating variables. Lastly, we apply our methodology to a novel study of the relationship between the economy and arrest rates, and how this is potentially mediated by police capacity.

We study variation in policing outcomes attributable to differential policing practices in New York City (NYC) using geographic regression discontinuity designs (GeoRDDs). By focusing on small geographic windows near police precinct boundaries we can estimate local average treatment effects of police precinct practices on arrest rates. We propose estimands and develop estimators for the GeoRDD when the data come from a spatial point process. Standard GeoRDDs rely on continuity assumptions of the potential outcome surface or a local randomization assumption within a window around the boundary. These assumptions, however, can easily be violated in real applications. We develop a novel and robust approach to testing whether there are differences in policing outcomes that are caused by differences in police precinct policies across NYC. Importantly, this approach is applicable to standard regression discontinuity designs with both numeric and point process data. This approach is robust to violations of traditional assumptions made, and is valid under weaker assumptions. We use a unique form of resampling to provide a valid estimate of our test statistic's null distribution even under violations of standard assumptions. This procedure gives substantially different results in the analysis of NYC arrest rates than those that rely on standard assumptions.

In New York City, neighborhood policing was adopted at the police precinct level over the years 2015-2018, and it is of interest to both (1) evaluate the impact of the policy, and (2) understand what types of communities are most impacted by the policy, raising questions of heterogeneous treatment effects. We develop novel statistical approaches that are robust to unmeasured confounding bias to study the causal effect of policies implemented at the community level. We find that neighborhood policing decreases discretionary arrests in certain areas of the city, but has little effect on crime or racial disparities in arrest rates.