Search

Difficulties presented by students on the concept of instantaneous velocity are well known. This is in part due to instantaneous speed being often defined in terms of the notion of mathematical limit, which may not be clear to many students in introductory physics courses. In this work we present a complementary teaching proposal that can help students to get a better grasp of instantaneous velocity. The approach is based on Galileo's ideas on instantaneous speed, which he borrowed from the Mertonian scholars much before infinitesimal calculus was developed., Comment: To be published in Physics Education (IOP)

The results of the National High School Examination (ENEM) are an important tool for a diagnosis of educational deficiencies at the end of a training cycle. This exam is a relevant source of data for the evaluation of what is learned by high school students. In this paper, thirteen selected questions are presented, from the Natural Sciences exam in the period between 2009 and 2014, questions that were classified as "physics questions", in which the alternatives reveal well-delimited non-scientific conceptions described in the literature. From the students' performance on these items, observations about the learning process in physics in basic education are made. This study reveals that there are some permanent difficulties in understanding basic concepts of mechanics, thermal phenomena and geometric optics. Many of these questions point to the presence and even predominant role of non-scientific conceptions described in the research literature in physics teaching. Even knowing how difficult it is to modify these conceptions, the results reveal that, despite all the research effort in physics teaching since the 1980s, there was little impact of the results in the learning process, and only a few changes incorporating this knowlege in the didactic materials and in the teacher training courses. (Paper in Portuguese.), Comment: 36 pages, in Portuguese 29 figures, 16 tables. Submitted to Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica

The entrance to public universities in Brazil depends on scores obtained by students in Enem, Brazilian National Assessment of High School Education. This exam consists of four multiple choice tests (Language, Maths, Natural and Human Sciences) scored by Item Response Theory (IRT). It is a high stake exam for students, allowing the use of its results of this exam to provide conditions for monitoring high school learning and quality of education in Brazil. We present a study of the Physics items of Enem from 2009 to 2014. The questions were classified based on qualitative categories, providing a profile of the Natural Sciences test: a disciplinary exam (Physics, Chemistry and Biology), with mostly qualitative questions, long and time consuming items, only a few of them demanding more complex reasoning and assessing some problem solving skills. The answers of the students were analyzed, using basic statistical exploration and IRT to draw the ICC of the Physics items. A comparison was made between the qualitative analysis and the quantitative analysis for the Physics questions. The study of student performance reveals the low attaining levels of Physics learning at the end of high school, with a small percentage of correct answers; students perform worse in questions that require disciplinary knowledge or use of basic mathematical reasoning. It is also possible to observe discrepancies on the results of two subsets of groups: female students perform worse than male students in most items, and students that come from federal and private high school perform significantly better that those from state high school (75% of students in high school attend state or regional schools). In conclusion, the combined analysis of student's performance and content of the items reveal some of the characteristics of student's learning in Brazil, at around 18 years, that can impact Physics Education system., Comment: 15 pages, 5 figures, 8 tables. Submitted to Physical Review Physics Education Research

Learning assessments are subject of discussions that envolve theoretical and practical approaches. To measure learning in physics by high school students, either qualitatively or quantitatively, is a process in which it should be possible to identify not only the concepts and contents students failed to achieve but also the reasons of the failure. We propose that students' video production offers a very effective formative assessment to teachers: as a formative assessment, it produces information that allows the understanding of where and when the learning process succeeded or failed, of identifying, as a subject or as a group, the defficiencies or misunderstandings related to the theme under analysis and their interpretation by students, and it provides also a different kind of assessment, related to some other life skills, like the ability to carry a project to its conclusion and to work cooperatively. In this paper, we describe the use of videos produced by high school students as an assessment resource. The students were asked to prepare a short video, which was then presented to the whole group and discussed. The videos reveal aspects of students' difficulties that usually do not appear in formal assessments such as tests and questionnaires. After the use of the videos as an component of classroom assessments and the use of the discussions to rethink learning activities in the group, the videos were analysed and classified in various categories. This analysis showed a strong correlation between the technical quality of the video and the content quality of the students argumentation. Also, it was shown that the students don't prepare their video based on quick and easy production, they usually choose forms of video production that require careful planning and implementation, and this reflects directly on the overall quality of the video and of the learning process., Comment: Paper presented at ICPE - International Conference on Physics Education, Prague, August 2013. Submitted for publication (Annals of the Conference). 8 pages, 1 figure, 5 tables. Grant from Brazil / CAPES / Observat\'orio da Educa\c{c}\~ao

The Brazilian National Assessment of Secondary Education (ENEM, Exame Nacional do Ensino M\'edio) has changed in 2009: from a self-assessment of competences at the end of high school to an assessment that allows access to college and student financing. From a single general exam, now there are tests in four areas: Mathematics, Language, Natural Sciences and Social Sciences. A new Reference Matrix is build with components as cognitive domains, competencies, skills and knowledge objects; also, the methodological framework has changed, using now Item Response Theory to provide scores and allowing longitudinal comparison of results from different years, providing conditions for monitoring high school quality in Brazil. We present a study on the issues discussed in Natural Science Test of ENEM over the years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Qualitative variables are proposed to characterize the items, and data from students' responses in Physics items were analysed. The qualitative analysis reveals the characteristics of the exam in these years: long items, only a few of them demanding more complex reasoning, a characteristic of problem solving skills. The analysis of student performance also reveals that learning physics is not attained, with a percentage of correct answers on items that is almost always small, and that items that require some type of disciplinary knowledge or require use of mathematical reasoning presents a performance significantly weaker., Comment: Paper to appear in Revista Brasileira de Ensino de F\'isica (Brazilian Journal on Physics Education). Written in Portuguese. 20 pages, 12 figures and tables