Search

Many countries have experienced at least two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. The second wave is far more dangerous as distinct strains appear more harmful to human health, but it stems from the complacency about the first wave. This paper introduces a parsimonious yet representative stochastic epidemic model that simulates the uncertain spread of the disease regardless of the latency and recovery time distributions. We also propose a Markov decision process to seek an optimal trade-off between the usage of the healthcare system and the economic costs of an epidemic. We apply the model to COVID-19 data from New Delhi, India and simulate the epidemic spread with different policy review times. The results show that the optimal policy acts swiftly to curb the epidemic in the first wave, thus avoiding the collapse of the healthcare system and the future costs of posterior outbreaks. An analysis of the recent collapse of the healthcare system of India during the second COVID-19 wave suggests that many lives could have been preserved if swift mitigation was promoted after the first wave.

This paper introduces a new multi-strain epidemic model with reinfection and cross-immunity to provide insights into the resurgence of the COVID-19 epidemic in an area with reportedly high seroprevalence due to a largely unmitigated outbreak: the state of Amazonas, Brazil. Although high seroprevalence could have been expected to trigger herd immunity and prevent further waves in the state, we have observed persistent levels of infection after the first wave and eventually the emergence of a second viral strain just before an augmented second wave. Our experiments suggest that the persistent levels of infection after the first wave may be due to reinfection, whereas the higher peak at the second wave can be explained by the emergence of the second variant and a low level of cross-immunity between the original and the second variant. Finally, the proposed model provides insights into the effect of reinfection and cross-immunity on the long-term spread of an unmitigated epidemic.

In this paper we propose a novel SEIR stochastic epidemic model. A distinguishing feature of this new model is that it allows us to consider a set up under general latency and infectious period distributions. To some extent, queuing systems with infinitely many servers and a Markov chain with time-varying transition rate are the very technical underpinning of the paper. Although more general, the Markov chain is as tractable as previous models for exponentially distributed latency and infection periods. It is also significantly simpler and more tractable than semi-Markov models with a similar level of generality. Based on the notion of stochastic stability, we derive a sufficient condition for a shrinking epidemic in terms of the queuing system's occupation rate that drives the dynamics. Relying on this condition, we propose a class of ad-hoc stabilising mitigation strategies that seek to keep a balanced occupation rate after a prescribed mitigation-free period. We validate the approach in the light of recent data on the COVID-19 epidemic and assess the effect of different stabilising strategies. The results suggest that it is possible to curb the epidemic with various occupation rate levels, as long as the mitigation is not excessively procrastinated.

This work introduces a novel epidemiological model that simultaneously considers multiple viral strains, reinfections due to waning immunity response over time and an optimal control formulation. This enables us to derive optimal mitigation strategies over a prescribed time horizon under a more realistic framework that does not imply perennial immunity and a single strain, although these can also be derived as particular cases of our formulation. The model also allows estimation of the number of infections over time in the absence of mitigation strategies under any number of viral strains. We validate our approach in the light of the COVID-19 epidemic and present a number of experiments to shed light on the overall behaviour under one or two strains in the absence of sufficient mitigation measures. We also derive optimal control strategies for distinct mitigation costs and evaluate the effect of these costs on the optimal mitigation measures over a two-year horizon. The results show that relaxations in the mitigation measures cause a rapid increase in the number of cases, which then demand more restrictive measures in the future.