Search

Background and Purpose: Sarcopenia is a common muscle disease among the older population, posing an increased risk for functional decline and loss of independence in daily living. Early detection of sarcopenia among older people before functional decline would be beneficial in enhancing their quality of life. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 recommends the use of 3 screening methods for community-based sarcopenia detection: calf circumference (CC), or the Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire, or the SARC-F in combination with CC (SARC-CalF) questionnaire. This study aims to compare the relative performance of these 3 methods as screening tools for sarcopenia within a community-dwelling older population. Methods: A total of 700 community-dwelling older adults participated in the current study. Muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance were measured with bioelectrical impedance analysis, handgrip strength, and gait speed, respectively. The AWGS 2019 criteria were considered the criterion standard The sensitivity/specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses were determined for CC, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF to determine their relative diagnostic performance. Results: Sarcopenia was identified in 21.4% of participants according to the AWGS2019 criteria. The overall prevalence of sarcopenia was 56.6%, 14.7%, and 22.9% according to CC, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF, respectively. Calf circumference showed the highest sensitivity but lowest specificity based on AWGS 2019 as the criterion standard regardless of age, gender, and body mass index. The SARC-CalF showed better sensitivity but similar specificity than the SARC-F. The AUROC of CC was significantly better than that of SARC-F and SARC-CalF. The AUROCs of CC, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF were statistically significant in all populations, as well as in the categories of age, gender, and body mass index (P < .05). Conclusions: Calf circumference is useful in ruling out the presence of sarcopenia while the SARC-F is more effec-tive in ruling in sarcopenia, especially in the context of population-based screening. Future studies should be carried out to investigate the value of population-based sarcopenia detection using these screening tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore existing practices and challenges in the delivery of geriatric home medication review (HMR). The study was part of a larger study aimed to offer solution to expand the range of geriatric HMR. Methods: This study employed qualitative exploratory design through semi-structured individual in-depth interviews with the public pharmacists involved in the delivery of geriatric HMR at public hospitals. The purpose of the interviews was to explore challenges faced by them in the delivery of geriatric HMR. Results: Based on the emerging themes from the qualitative data, the study reveals that geriatric HMR in Malaysia is integrated as part of multidisciplinary home care visits, encompassing a diverse patient population with various healthcare needs. However, it faces challenges such as the lack of outcome monitoring, formal training, and workforce constraints. Despite these hurdles, there is a pressing need for the expansion of this service to better serve the community, and collaboration with community pharmacists holds potential to broaden its scope. Ultimately, the findings suggest that pharmacist- led HMR is both warranted and feasible within the Malaysian healthcare context. In order to optimize medicine-use among older people living in the community, approaches for expanding geriatric HMR services in Malaysia must be developed. Conclusions: This study holds profound implications as it attempts to illuminate policy makers in developing countries, enabling them to formulate effective HMR plans. By considering the challenges highlighted within this research, policy makers can design a comprehensive HMR service that caters adeptly to the healthcare needs of the mass population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To compare and contrast falls characteristics between older adults with body mass index of 25.0 kg/m² or greater and less than 25.0 kg/m² and to further identify potential underlying mechanisms if differences existed. Subjects and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using data from fallers identified during the first wave of the Malaysian Elders Longitudinal Research study. Basic demographics, falls characteristics, fear of falling, medical comorbidities, and lifestyle factors were obtained during a home-based computer-assisted interview, while anthropometric measurements, body composition, and physical performance were collected during the hospital-based health check. Results: Of the 302 individuals with 1 or more falls in the previous 12 months, mean age (SD) = 69.6 (7.7) years, 152 individuals (50.3%) were in the body mass index of 25.0 group or greater. Fallers with body mass index of 25.0 or greater were more likely to have fallen in the bedroom and on the stairs (adjusted odds ratio = 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-5.73) and less likely to fall in the afternoon (adjusted odds ratio = 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.83) after adjustment for potential confounders. Conclusions: Our study suggests that mechanisms of falls may differ in those with excess body weight, who may benefit from specific targeted fall prevention programmes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to identify factors that influence the implementation of fall prevention programs from the perspectives of the family physician (FP). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with all 1800 members of the Academy of Family Medicine, Malaysia. Results: Sixty (54%) and 75 (67%) FPs did not routinely ask older people about falls and fear of falling, respectively. Seventy-nine FPs (71%) reported being unfamiliar with any guidelines for screening for fall risk. Conclusion: Our study revealed major gaps in the delivery of evidence-based fall prevention in practice by Malaysian FPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]