Search

Cemented dual mobility cups (DMCs) are commonly used in combination with acetabular reinforcement devices. Indeed, according to literature, direct cementation of metal-backed acetabular components into the bony acetabulum remains controversial as this technique is potentially associated with increased rates of aseptic loosening. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of DMC cemented into the bony acetabulum in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 49 THA (48 patients, mean age 78 years [range, 51 to 91]) performed with direct cementation of a DMC into the bony acetabulum were prospectively included in our total joint registry and retrospectively reviewed. The clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS). The radiographic outcome included measurement of component positioning and occurrence and progression of demarcation around the cemented DMC. Complications were reported with a particular attention to cemented fixation failure and aseptic loosening. At a 7-year mean follow-up (range, 5 to 8), the pre-to postoperative HHS improved from 47 (range, 30 to 58) to 92 points (range, 80 to 98) (P <.01). Nonprogressive and focalized demarcations were observed in 7 THA (14%). Importantly, no progressive demarcation or DMC aseptic loosening was observed. Direct cementation of DMC into the bony acetabulum ensured a stable fixation with no progressive demarcation or aseptic loosening at midterm follow-up. Therefore, this technique can be selectively considered in primary THA, especially in elderly or frail patients to avoid potential mechanical failure of press-fit fixation due to altered bone quality or additional morbidity related to the use of acetabular reinforcement devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although the antidislocation effect of total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) with dual mobility cup (DMC) for displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) has already been reported, the clinical result of DMC-DAA-THA for displaced FNF in terms of mortality, complications, and walking ability are still unclear.Methods: 106 cases with DMC-DAA-THA for displaced FNF were investigated of dislocation; perioperative complications; 3-, 6-, and12-month mortality rate; and pre/early postoperative walking ability. The walking ability was stratified into the following four categories: (1) use of a wheelchair (no walking), (2) walking alongside a support (including walkers designed for the elderly), (3) walking using one stick, and (4) unaided walking.Results: There was no dislocation withing one-year postoperative. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month mortality rate was 2.8%, 4.7%, and 5.7%. Total complications occurred in 14 cases (14.7%). Although there was no revision surgery, two cases (1.9%) of intraoperative fracture treated without additional fixation, and one case of postoperative fracture was occurred. Among patients with preinjury walking category 2, 3, and 4 (total 94 cases), the number of patients who recovered same walking category at two-week postoperation was 56 cases (59.6%).Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that DMC-DAA-THA for displaced FNF offered quick recovery of walking ability with no dislocation and low one-year mortality rate. We believe that the combination of early postoperative recovery due to the minimal invasiveness of the DAA and decreased dislocation rate due to increased range of motion by DMC and adequate soft tissue tension by DAA contributed to null dislocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dual mobility acetabular cups (DMC) were designed to increase the effective femoral head size and improve stability with the goal of reducing revision risk at the potential cost of polyethylene thickness. We sought to evaluate revision risk following primary elective total hip arthroplasty with DMC compared to highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE). A cohort study was conducted using data from a Kaiser Permanente's total joint arthroplasty registry. Patients ≥18 years who underwent primary elective total hip arthroplasty using DMC, unipolar Metal-on-XLPE (MoXLPE), or unipolar Ceramic-on-XLPE (CoXLPE) were identified (2010 to 2021). The final sample comprised 2,219 DMC, 48,251 MoXLPE, and 57,058 CoXLPE. Multiple Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to evaluate aseptic revision and any dislocation regardless of revision within 6 years follow-up. In adjusted analyses, no differences in aseptic revision risk were observed for MoXLPE (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 1.51) or CoXLPE (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.69 to 1.40) compared to DMC. No differences in dislocation risk were observed for MoXLPE (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.93 to 2.15) or CoXLPE (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.87) compared to DMC. In a US-based cohort, 6-year aseptic revision risk of DMC was similar to metal or ceramic femoral head unipolar constructs. Furthermore, no difference in dislocation risk was observed. Continued longer-term follow-up may reveal if there is a reduced risk of dislocation that comes at the cost of increased late revision. Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dislocation is a common complication of Total Hip Replacement (THR), particularly when performed in primary (indications with increased risk of instability) and in revision scenarios. Dual mobility THR (DMTHR) minimizes the risk of instability in such scenarios, however most of the evidence is from western literature. Results of DMTHR in Indian scenarios where patient want to go back to their normal routine activities of squatting and sitting cross-legged is lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate the short to mid-term results of DMTHR for varied indications (both primary and revision) in Indian scenario. To evaluate the outcome of the DMTHR in terms of functional range of motion and the ability to go back to their pre-injury level of activity. This is a retrospective study of 150 patients operated with DMTHR between January 2015 to February 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients were evaluated clinically using Modified Harris Hip Score (HHS), Range of Motion (ROM), and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) like ability to squat and sit cross legged. Radiological evaluation was done using radiographs to assess loosening, stress shielding, osteolysis. Mean follow up in our study was 25.2 months (Range 12–46 months). Mean Modified HHS was 71.8 ± 8.11 at 6 weeks post-op and 85.8 ± 7.62 at last follow-up. HHS showed excellent outcome in 36 hips (26.7%), good outcome in 76 hips (56.7%), fair outcome in 20 hips (14.6%), poor outcome in 3 hips (2%). All our patients were allowed to squat and sit cross-legged at a mean follow-up period of 13 weeks (8 weeks–20 weeks) except 10 cases of Revision THR where patients were advised not to squat or sit cross-legged. All patients were able to resume their activities of daily living. DMTHR in patients of all ages has shown a good short to midterm clinical outcome which is comparable to conventional THR. It confers the benefit of stability allowing our patients to squat and sit cross legged which is often one of the expectation and requirement of a patient undergoing THR in India. DMTHR in both primary and revision scenarios exhibit a low risk of dislocation, complications and revision surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment of adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) is challenging owing to high complications and poor outcomes after a revision surgery. As dislocation is the most common cause of reoperation, it is often necessary to use advanced articulations such as dual mobility. This study aims to evaluate the outcome and complication rates after revision surgery with dual mobility constructs, compared to constrained and conventional articulations in the setting of significant abductor deficiency due to ALTR.Methods: Out of a total of 338 revision total hip arthroplasties for ALTR, 234 patients with a significant tissue necrosis and abductor muscle insufficiency (grade 3) were evaluated. The complication rates after revisions were compared between 42 hips with dual mobility implants, 24 hips with constrained liners, 104 hips with large diameter heads (36-40 mm), and 64 hips with small diameter heads (≤32 mm).Results: After an average of 4 years of follow-up (2.8-8.6), the dual mobility articulation had no dislocation, compared to 4.1% and 15.5% for constrained liner and conventional articulations, respectively (P < .001). Utilization of dual mobility and constrained liner cup also did not increase the risk of nondislocation complications, including periprosthetic joint infection and periprosthetic fracture (P = .18 and .52).Conclusions: This study demonstrates significantly lower dislocation rates for dual mobility when compared to conventional articulations and comparable to constrained liners in cases of severe abductor deficiency due to ALTR, suggesting that dual mobility implants are viable surgical treatment alternatives to constrained liners to minimize dislocation during revision total hip arthroplasty in the setting of significant abductor deficiency due to ALTR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is a challenging surgery with a higher rate of complications than primary arthroplasty, particularly instability and aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study is to compare dual mobility cup (DMC) and standard mobility cup (SMC) in all rTHAs performed at our institution over a decade with a 1 year minimum follow-up.Methods: Two hundred ninety-five rTHAs (acetabular only and bipolar revisions) between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. These were divided into those with a DMC (184 revisions) or SMC (111 revisions). Dislocation and complications requiring re-revision were reported.Results: The rTHA mean age was 69 years ± 13.9 (19-92) and the mean follow-up was 2.3 years. Dislocation risk was statistically lower (P = .01) with a DMC (3.8%; 7/184) than with an SMC (13.5%; 15/111). DMC required re-rTHA in 24/184 (13%) for any reason compared to SMC in 19/111 (17.1%) (P = .34). There was no significant difference in early aseptic loosening (P = .28) between the 2 groups. For young patients (≤55 years), results were similar with a lower dislocation rate in the DMC group (P = .24) and no increased risk of early aseptic loosening (P = .49).Conclusion: This study demonstrates that for all rTHA indications DMC compared to SMC has a significantly decreased risk of postoperative dislocation without risk of early aseptic loosening at medium term follow-up. The use of DMC in rTHA is an important consideration particularly with the predicted increased incidence of both primary and revision THA globally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Concept born from the observation that 1) systematic conventional techniques for implanting hip components are still affected by some complications that technological improvements have not entirely solved, and 2) the increasing awareness that abnormal lumbo-pelvic kinematics are responsible for clinically detrimental poor functional cup orientation and components' interaction (edge loading and articular impingement) that occur during activities of daily living. Following on from this, the kinematic alignment (KA) technique for total hip replacement (THR) has been developed and consists of personalising the implantation of components, with the intention of restoring the pre-arthritic hip joint anatomy: centre of rotation, acetabular anteversion, and proximal femur anatomy. The acetabular component orientation will be adjusted from its native orientation (transverse acetabular ligament) for patients with poor functional acetabular orientation due to an abnormal spine-hip relationship (≍10 to 35% of patients). As the majority of conditions that lead to hip degeneration are automatically corrected when anatomically replacing a hip, there is little-to-no risk of reproducing the hip anatomy, with the exception of developmental disease. The cup adjustment aims, by reaching a compromise, to optimise the components' interaction between the standing and the sitting positions. The intended benefits of the KA technique for THR are primarily to reduce risk of prosthetic instability and failure as a result of the improved functional components' interaction, and secondarily to improve functional performances and patient satisfaction due to the anatomical implantation and subsequent physiological prosthetic hip kinematics. A parallel may be drawn between the KA technique for THR and the concept of "restricted KA technique for total knee replacement", as in both techniques component positioning primarily aims to reproduce the native joint anatomy, with only a fraction of patients requiring component orientation adjustment in order to compensate for a biomechanically sub-optimal pre-operative joint condition. Planning a KA-THR is simple (physical examination and radiographic measurements to distinguish between hip and spine users, in order to define the individual spine-hip relationship), and surgery can be reliably performed free hand. As the pre-operative individual spine-hip relationship is also influenced by the stiff osteoarthritic hip (hip-spine syndrome), further research is needed to refine the indication and the level of cup orientation adjustment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Constrained liners are used as part of a salvage procedure to provide stability for patients at high risk for dislocation after a total hip arthroplasty. However, no recent studies exist highlighting their effectiveness and/or limitations.Method: This prospective review included 166 consecutive hip arthroplasties, either primary (27%) or revision (73%), with a unique design of a constrained liner: Lefèvre retentive cup. There were 113 females (69%), and the average age at index surgery was 75.9 years (range, 35-94). The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0.3-11).Results: Twenty patients had a reoperation; 10 for infection (4 acute and 6 chronic joint infection) and 10 for cup failure (5 fixation failure, 3 aseptic loosening, and 2 dislocation). Ten-year survivals for cup revision were 89% (CI, 83-94) and 92% (CI, 89-97) for all revision and revision for noninfectious reasons, respectively. When solely evaluating for dislocation, the survival at 10 years was 99% (CI, 97-100). Considering primary and revision cases, 10-year survivals cup revision for aseptic reasons were 92.4% (CI, 84-100) and 92.5% (CI, 87-98), respectively.Conclusions: The Lefèvre retentive cup demonstrated excellent 10-year's survivorship. With the rate of aseptic loosening around 2% and a dislocation rate around 1%, the cup is as effective as other available devices and is therefore a cost-effective tool to reduce the risk of dislocation in at-risk patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The outcome of a single design of dual mobility cup was prospectively evaluated in a continuous series of 994 revision THAs with respect to dislocation and intra-prosthetic dislocation (IPD). At a 7.3-year mean follow-up, the dislocation rate was 1.5% and the IPD rate was 0.2%. The 2 IPD occurred in acetabular-only revisions and were related to a poor head-to-neck ratio with early impingement and wear at the polyethylene mobile component chamfer. Dual mobility cups demonstrated a low dislocation rate in revision THA but did not compensate for potential perioperative technical errors. In addition, IPD did not appear to be a concern with respect to the benefit in term of instability prevention though caution is advised in acetabular-only revision associated with a poor head-to-neck ratio. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study—Level IV [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The current study aimed to evaluate the outcome of a continuous and prospective series of 61 revision THAs with AAOS grade III and IV acetabular bone defect reconstruction using a Kerboull cross-plate, structural allograft and cemented dual mobility cup (Saturne, Amplitude, Valence, France). At a 7.5-year mean follow-up, no instability was reported after revision. In addition, no failure of the acetabular reconstruction was observed in 98% of the patients with complete allograft osseointegration and no evidence of mechanical rupture of the Kerboull cross-plate and/or loosening of the cemented dual mobility cup. In conclusion, such reconstruction technique demonstrated excellent results at mid-term follow-up in terms of prevention of instability after revision, restoration of the acetabular bone stock, and stable cemented fixation of the dual mobility cup. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

abstract: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with excellent functional outcomes and survival rates (Cushner et al., 2010 [1]). Selection of acetabular shell and technique of implantation is an important factor as is the stem for a successful THA. Both cemented all-polyethylene cups and cementless sockets have benefited from improvements in surgical techniques, cup designs, and bearing surfaces. This paper is a review of the current literature that focuses on the options for the acetabular components of a modern total hip replacement, aiming to answer common questions and controversies on this topic. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The dual mobility cup is an unconstrained tripolar configuration newly introduced to the United States in February 2011. The dual mobility construct allows for a larger femoral head to improve motion and minimize the risk of dislocation. We present a case of a patient who received the dual mobility cup for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Early in the patient''s postoperative course, the implant failed at the articulation between the larger outer polyethylene head and inner smaller metal femoral head following an attempt at closed reduction. This implant specific complication has not been reported in the North American literature. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]