Search

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of 2 artificial intelligence (AI) models, Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer-3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5; OpenAI, San Francisco, Calif) and Google Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (Google Bard; Bard Experiment, Google, Mountain View, Calif), in terms of response accuracy, completeness, generation time, and response length when answering general orthodontic questions. A team of orthodontic specialists developed a set of 100 questions in 10 orthodontic domains. One author submitted the questions to both ChatGPT and Google Bard. The AI-generated responses from both models were randomly assigned into 2 forms and sent to 5 blinded and independent assessors. The quality of AI-generated responses was evaluated using a newly developed tool for accuracy of information and completeness. In addition, response generation time and length were recorded. The accuracy and completeness of responses were high in both AI models. The median accuracy score was 9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8-9) for ChatGPT and 8 (IQR: 8-9) for Google Bard (Median difference: 1; P <0.001). The median completeness score was similar in both models, with 8 (IQR: 8-9) for ChatGPT and 8 (IQR: 7-9) for Google Bard. The odds of accuracy and completeness were higher by 31% and 23% in ChatGPT than in Google Bard. Google Bard's response generation time was significantly shorter than that of ChatGPT by 10.4 second/question. However, both models were similar in terms of response length generation. Both ChatGPT and Google Bard generated responses were rated with a high level of accuracy and completeness to the posed general orthodontic questions. However, acquiring answers was generally faster using the Google Bard model. • ChatGPT and Google Bard models generated responses with a high level of accuracy and completeness. • ChatGPT and Google Bard models demonstrated relative consistency in their performance. • Response generation was faster with Google Bard. • ChatGPT and Google Bard models were similar in terms of response length generation. • A newly developed accuracy of information index was used in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Asymmetry of the lips severely affects facial esthetics and is often one of the chief complaints of orthognathic patients, especially those with Class III malocclusion. The objectives of this study were to investigate the changes in lip symmetry in patients with mandibular prognathism and deviation and the relationships between jaw hard tissue and lip soft-tissue changes.Methods: Three-dimensional facial scan and cone-beam computed tomography scan data of 30 orthodontic-orthognathic patients treated with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy were combined to conduct the research. Paired-sample t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were applied to compare the differences in the same variable before and after the orthognathic surgery and the potential correlations between the changes in hard and soft variables. To explore the important hard tissue variables influencing the lip soft-tissue changes, linear regression analysis was performed.Results: Although there was significant upper lip asymmetry presurgery, the upper lip asymmetry was corrected postsurgery. Surgical correction of the mandibular deviation was also accompanied by lengthening of the bilateral philtrum crests. Improvement in lip asymmetry and lengthening of the philtrum crests were primarily related to the transverse correction of the mandible rather than sagittal changes. The corresponding prediction formulas were established.Conclusions: The isolated mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy surgery can substantially improve the upper and lower lip asymmetry in patients with mandibular prognathism and deviation, but one should be wary of the unesthetic effects associated with lengthening of the philtrum crests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Insufficient bone volume compromises the success rate and osseointegration of immediate implantation. The objective of the present study was to engineer bone tissue by using adipose-derived stem cell (ASC) sheets and autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to enhance new bone formation and osseointegration around dental implants. Material and Methods The proliferation and osteogenic potential of ASCs treated with autologous PRF were evaluated with CCK-8 assays, alkaline phosphatase staining, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. A 3-wall bone defect around each immediate implant was generated in the mandible and randomly treated with ASC sheets plus PRF (group A), ASC sheets only (group B), PRF only (group C), or no treatment (group D). Micro-computed tomography, biomechanical tests, fluorescent bone labeling, and histologic assessments were performed to evaluate bone regeneration capacity. Results The proliferation and osteogenic potential of canine ASCs were markedly enhanced by PRF. Group A exhibited considerably more new bone formation and re-osseointegration (41.17 ± 1.44 and 55.06 ± 0.06%, respectively) than did the other 3 groups. Fluorescent labeling showed that the most rapid bone remodeling activity occurred in group A (P <.05). Conclusion These results suggest that sheets of ASC combined with autologous PRF could be a promising tissue-engineering strategy for bone formation in immediate implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Insufficient bone volume compromises the success rate and osseointegration of immediate implantation. The objective of the present study was to engineer bone tissue by using adipose-derived stem cell (ASC) sheets and autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to enhance new bone formation and osseointegration around dental implants.Material and Methods: The proliferation and osteogenic potential of ASCs treated with autologous PRF were evaluated with CCK-8 assays, alkaline phosphatase staining, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. A 3-wall bone defect around each immediate implant was generated in the mandible and randomly treated with ASC sheets plus PRF (group A), ASC sheets only (group B), PRF only (group C), or no treatment (group D). Micro-computed tomography, biomechanical tests, fluorescent bone labeling, and histologic assessments were performed to evaluate bone regeneration capacity.Results: The proliferation and osteogenic potential of canine ASCs were markedly enhanced by PRF. Group A exhibited considerably more new bone formation and re-osseointegration (41.17 ± 1.44 and 55.06 ± 0.06%, respectively) than did the other 3 groups. Fluorescent labeling showed that the most rapid bone remodeling activity occurred in group A (P < .05).Conclusion: These results suggest that sheets of ASC combined with autologous PRF could be a promising tissue-engineering strategy for bone formation in immediate implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]