5 results on '"Yinda, Claude kwe"'
Search Results
2. SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence in the human body and brain at autopsy
- Author
-
Stein, Sydney R., Ramelli, Sabrina C., Grazioli, Alison, Chung, Joon-Yong, Singh, Manmeet, Yinda, Claude Kwe, Winkler, Clayton W., Sun, Junfeng, Dickey, James M., Ylaya, Kris, Ko, Sung Hee, Platt, Andrew P., Burbelo, Peter D., Quezado, Martha, Pittaluga, Stefania, Purcell, Madeleine, Munster, Vincent J., Belinky, Frida, Ramos-Benitez, Marcos J., Boritz, Eli A., Lach, Izabella A., Herr, Daniel L., Rabin, Joseph, Saharia, Kapil K., Madathil, Ronson J., Tabatabai, Ali, Soherwardi, Shahabuddin, McCurdy, Michael T., Peterson, Karin E., Cohen, Jeffrey I., de Wit, Emmie, Vannella, Kevin M., Hewitt, Stephen M., Kleiner, David E., and Chertow, Daniel S.
- Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to cause multi-organ dysfunction1–3during acute infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with some patients experiencing prolonged symptoms, termed post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (refs. 4,5). However, the burden of infection outside the respiratory tract and time to viral clearance are not well characterized, particularly in the brain3,6–14. Here we carried out complete autopsies on 44 patients who died with COVID-19, with extensive sampling of the central nervous system in 11 of these patients, to map and quantify the distribution, replication and cell-type specificity of SARS-CoV-2 across the human body, including the brain, from acute infection to more than seven months following symptom onset. We show that SARS-CoV-2 is widely distributed, predominantly among patients who died with severe COVID-19, and that virus replication is present in multiple respiratory and non-respiratory tissues, including the brain, early in infection. Further, we detected persistent SARS-CoV-2 RNA in multiple anatomic sites, including throughout the brain, as late as 230 days following symptom onset in one case. Despite extensive distribution of SARS-CoV-2 RNA throughout the body, we observed little evidence of inflammation or direct viral cytopathology outside the respiratory tract. Our data indicate that in some patients SARS-CoV-2 can cause systemic infection and persist in the body for months.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Ecology, evolution and spillover of coronaviruses from bats
- Author
-
Ruiz-Aravena, Manuel, McKee, Clifton, Gamble, Amandine, Lunn, Tamika, Morris, Aaron, Snedden, Celine E., Yinda, Claude Kwe, Port, Julia R., Buchholz, David W., Yeo, Yao Yu, Faust, Christina, Jax, Elinor, Dee, Lauren, Jones, Devin N., Kessler, Maureen K., Falvo, Caylee, Crowley, Daniel, Bharti, Nita, Brook, Cara E., Aguilar, Hector C., Peel, Alison J., Restif, Olivier, Schountz, Tony, Parrish, Colin R., Gurley, Emily S., Lloyd-Smith, James O., Hudson, Peter J., Munster, Vincent J., and Plowright, Raina K.
- Abstract
In the past two decades, three coronaviruses with ancestral origins in bats have emerged and caused widespread outbreaks in humans, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since the first SARS epidemic in 2002–2003, the appreciation of bats as key hosts of zoonotic coronaviruses has advanced rapidly. More than 4,000 coronavirus sequences from 14 bat families have been identified, yet the true diversity of bat coronaviruses is probably much greater. Given that bats are the likely evolutionary source for several human coronaviruses, including strains that cause mild upper respiratory tract disease, their role in historic and future pandemics requires ongoing investigation. We review and integrate information on bat–coronavirus interactions at the molecular, tissue, host and population levels. We identify critical gaps in knowledge of bat coronaviruses, which relate to spillover and pandemic risk, including the pathways to zoonotic spillover, the infection dynamics within bat reservoir hosts, the role of prior adaptation in intermediate hosts for zoonotic transmission and the viral genotypes or traits that predict zoonotic capacity and pandemic potential. Filling these knowledge gaps may help prevent the next pandemic.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Clinical benefit of remdesivir in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2
- Author
-
Williamson, Brandi N., Feldmann, Friederike, Schwarz, Benjamin, Meade-White, Kimberly, Porter, Danielle P., Schulz, Jonathan, van Doremalen, Neeltje, Leighton, Ian, Yinda, Claude Kwe, Pérez-Pérez, Lizzette, Okumura, Atsushi, Lovaglio, Jamie, Hanley, Patrick W., Saturday, Greg, Bosio, Catharine M., Anzick, Sarah, Barbian, Kent, Cihlar, Tomas, Martens, Craig, Scott, Dana P., Munster, Vincent J., and de Wit, Emmie
- Abstract
Effective therapies to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are urgently needed. While many investigational, approved, and repurposed drugs have been suggested as potential treatments, preclinical data from animal models can guide the search for effective treatments by ruling out those that lack efficacy in vivo. Remdesivir (GS-5734) is a nucleotide analogue prodrug with broad antiviral activity1,2that is currently being investigated in COVID-19 clinical trials and recently received Emergency Use Authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration3,4. In animal models, remdesivir was effective against infection with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)2,5,6. In vitro, remdesivir inhibited replication of SARS-CoV-27,8. Here we investigate the efficacy of remdesivir in a rhesus macaque model of SARS-CoV-2 infection9. Unlike vehicle-treated animals, macaques treated with remdesivir did not show signs of respiratory disease; they also showed reduced pulmonary infiltrates on radiographs and reduced virus titres in bronchoalveolar lavages twelve hours after the first dose. Virus shedding from the upper respiratory tract was not reduced by remdesivir treatment. At necropsy, remdesivir-treated animals had lower lung viral loads and reduced lung damage. Thus, treatment with remdesivir initiated early during infection had a clinical benefit in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2. Although the rhesus macaque model does not represent the severe disease observed in some patients with COVID-19, our data support the early initiation of remdesivir treatment in patients with COVID-19 to prevent progression to pneumonia.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Author Correction: Ecology, evolution and spillover of coronaviruses from bats
- Author
-
Ruiz-Aravena, Manuel, McKee, Clifton, Gamble, Amandine, Lunn, Tamika, Morris, Aaron, Snedden, Celine E., Yinda, Claude Kwe, Port, Julia R., Buchholz, David W., Yeo, Yao Yu, Faust, Christina, Jax, Elinor, Dee, Lauren, Jones, Devin N., Kessler, Maureen K., Falvo, Caylee, Crowley, Daniel, Bharti, Nita, Brook, Cara E., Aguilar, Hector C., Peel, Alison J., Restif, Olivier, Schountz, Tony, Parrish, Colin R., Gurley, Emily S., Lloyd-Smith, James O., Hudson, Peter J., Munster, Vincent J., and Plowright, Raina K.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.