Search

The objectives of precision medicine are to better match patient characteristics with the therapeutic intervention to optimize the chances of beneficial actions while reducing the exposure to unneeded adverse drug experiences. In a retrospective genome-wide association study of the overall neutral placebo-controlled dal-Outcomes trial, the effect of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) modulator dalcetrapib on the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke was found to be influenced by a polymorphism in the adenylate cyclase type 9 (ADCY9) gene. Whereas patients with the AA genotype at position rs1967309 experienced fewer cardiovascular events with dalcetrapib, those with the GG genotype had an increased rate and the heterozygous AG genotype exhibited no difference from placebo. Measurements of cholesterol efflux and C-reactive protein (CRP) offered directionally supportive genotype-specific findings. In a separate, smaller, placebo-controlled trial, regression of ultrasonography-determined carotid intimal-medial thickness was only observed in dalcetrapib-treated patients with the AA genotype. Collectively, these observations led to the hypothesis that the cardiovascular effects of dalcetrapib may be pharmacogenetically determined, with a favorable benefit-risk ratio only for patients with this specific genotype. We describe below the design of dal-GenE, a precision medicine, placebo-controlled clinical outcome trial of dalcetrapib in patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction with the unique feature of selecting only those with the AA genotype at rs1967309 in the ADCY9 gene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Higher plasma fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) levels predict incident cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes patients. However, whether FGF21 levels predict cardiovascular events in statin-treated patients in the general population is unknown. We investigated whether FGF21 levels predict major cardiovascular event (MCVE) in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial participants. Methods After 8-week run-in on atorvastatin 10 mg/day, 10,001 patients with stable coronary disease in the TNT trial were randomized to 10 mg or 80 mg/day of atorvastatin for a median of 4.9 years. We analyzed data from 1996 patients with plasma FGF21 levels measured at randomization. Among them, 1835 patients had FGF21 measured one-year post-randomization. Results Higher ln-transformed FGF21 levels at randomization were associated with higher risk of incident MCVE (adjusted hazards ratio per SD increase = 1.18, P = 0.019). At 1-year post-randomization, FGF21 levels were lower in patients randomized to receive 80 mg versus 10 mg atorvastatin (186.9 versus 207.5 pg/mL respectively, P = 0.006). Higher ln-transformed FGF21 levels at 1-year post-randomization were also associated with higher subsequent risk of MCVEs (adjusted hazards ratio per SD increase = 1.24, P = 0.009). However, changes in FGF21 levels over 1-year were not related to subsequent MCVE risk. FGF21 levels had significant incremental value in net reclassification improvement in MCVE risk prediction. Conclusions Higher plasma FGF21 levels are associated with higher CVD risk in statin-treated high-risk patients. Higher dose atorvastatin is associated with a reduction in FGF21 levels. FGF21 provides incremental value in CVD risk prediction in statin-treated patients. Highlights • Elevated FGF21 levels at randomization were associated with incident MCVE. • At 1-year, FGF21 levels were lower in 80 mg versus 10 mg atorvastatin group • Elevated FGF21 levels at 1-year were associated with subsequent MCVE. • Changes in FGF21 levels over 1-year were not related to subsequent MCVE risk. • FGF21 provides incremental value in risk prediction in statin-treated patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Time to benefit (TTB) in clinical trials of cholesterol-lowering drugs is important because it may provide a clue as to the potential mechanism of action of the drug, it is helpful in determining when to stop a trial for futility, and it may inform treatment decisions in subjects with reduced life expectancy. Objective To compare TTB among clinical trials of cholesterol-lowering drugs. Methods We examined TTB in 24 trials of cholesterol-lowering drugs with positive outcomes. Benefit curves were constructed by subtracting the curve for a placebo or comparator drug from the curve for active treatment. Results TTB ranged from 1 to 30 (mean 13.1) months, being shorter in trials of statins (n = 17) compared to nonstatins (n = 7), 10.3 vs 20.0 months. Among statin trials, TTB was shorter with atorvastatin (n = 6) than in trials with other statins (n = 11), 4.75 compared to 11.4 months. Conclusions TTB is variable among trials of cholesterol-lowering drugs, being shorter with statin compared to nonstatin drugs. TTB is shorter with atorvastatin than with other statins. For trials of new cholesterol-lowering drugs, outcome curves that do not separate for up to 30 months do not preclude eventual benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Higher visit-to-visit variability in risk factors such as blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol are associated with an increase in cardiovascular (CV) events. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether variability in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride levels predicted coronary and CV events in a clinical trial population with known coronary disease. Methods We assessed intraindividual variability in fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-cholesterol measurements among 9572 patients in the Treating to New Targets trial and correlated the results with coronary events over a median follow-up of 4.9 years. Results In the fully adjusted Cox model, 1 standard deviation of average successive variability, defined as the average absolute difference between successive values, was associated with an increased risk of a coronary event for HDL-cholesterol (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.21, P < .0001), for triglycerides (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.15, P = .0005), and for LDL-cholesterol (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09–1.19, P < .0001). Similar results were found for the 3 other measures of variability, standard deviation, coefficient of variability, and variability independent of the mean. Similar results were seen for CV events, stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Higher variability in triglyceride and LDL-cholesterol, but not HDL-cholesterol, was predictive of incident diabetes. The correlation among the variability of the 3 lipid measurements was weak. Conclusion Visit-to-visit variability in fasting measurements of HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-cholesterol are predictive of coronary events, CV events, and for triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol variability, incident diabetes. The mechanisms accounting for these associations remain to be determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Proprotein subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels are causative risk factors for coronary heart disease. Objectives The objective of the study was to determine the impact of lipid-lowering treatments on circulating PCSK9 and Lp(a). Methods We measured PCSK9 and Lp(a) levels in plasma samples from Investigation of Lipid Level Management to Understand its Impact in Atherosclerotic Events trial patients with coronary heart disease and/or type II diabetes (T2D) mellitus. Patients received atorvastatin, which was titrated (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg/d) to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels <100 mg/dL (baseline) and were subsequently randomized either to atorvastatin + torcetrapib, a cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitor, or to atorvastatin + placebo. Results At baseline, both plasma PCSK9 and Lp(a) were dose-dependently increased with increasing atorvastatin doses. Compared with patients without T2D, those with T2D had higher PCSK9 (357 ± 123 vs 338 ± 115 ng/mL, P = .0012) and lower Lp(a) levels (28 ± 32 vs 32 ± 33 mg/dL, P = .0005). Plasma PCSK9 levels significantly increased in patients treated with torcetrapib (+13.1 ± 125.3 ng/mL [+3.7%], P = .005), but not in patients treated with placebo (+2.6 ± 127.9 ng/mL [+0.7%], P = .39). Plasma Lp(a) levels significantly decreased in patients treated with torcetrapib (−3.4 ± 10.7 mg/dL [−11.1%], P < .0001), but not in patients treated with placebo (+0.3 ± 9.4 mg/dL [+0.1%], P = .92). Conclusion In patients at high cardiovascular disease risk, PCSK9 and Lp(a) are positively and dose-dependently correlated with atorvastatin dosage, whereas the presence of T2D is associated with higher PCSK9 but lower Lp(a) levels. Cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition with torcetrapib slightly increases PCSK9 levels and decreases Lp(a) levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide, and diabetes is a strong adverse prognostic factor among patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease. Four classes of drugs that are commonly used for CV risk reduction, statins, niacin, thiazide diuretics, and ß-blockers, have been shown to increase the risk of new-onset diabetes (NOD) by 9% to 43% in meta-analyses or large-scale clinical trials. Clinical predictors for drug-related NOD appear to be similar to the predictors that have been described for NOD unrelated to drugs: fasting blood glucose >100 mg/dL and features of the metabolic syndrome such as body mass index >30 kg/m2, serum triglycerides >150 mg/dL, and elevated blood pressure, among others. The mechanisms whereby these drugs increase the risk of NOD are incompletely understood, although different hypotheses have been suggested. Lifestyle intervention consisting of diet and exercise has been shown in multiple studies to reduce the risk of NOD by approximately 50%, with persistent benefit during long-term follow-up. In patients at high risk for NOD, niacin should be avoided, and for hypertension, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or even a ß1-selective blocker might be a better choice than a standard ß-blocker. For thiazide diuretics and particularly statins, benefit in terms of CV event reduction outweighs the risk of NOD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: This post hoc nested case-control analysis of the TNT study was designed to investigate whether baseline vitamin D level is a significant predictor of cardiovascular risk among statin-treated patients and whether changes in vitamin D after treatment with atorvastatin are associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: A total of 10,001 patients with stable coronary heart disease were randomized to atorvastatin 80 or 10 mg for a median of 4.9 years. This analysis included 1,509 patients (497 with a subsequent cardiovascular event and 1,012 without an event) with vitamin D levels determined at baseline and 1 year. Event rates were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard model by baseline vitamin D levels, with vitamin D as a continuous variable, and with change in vitamin D level as the predictor. Results: Vitamin D deficiency (<15 ng/mL) or insufficiency (15- <30 ng/mL) was present in 108 (7.2%) of 1,509 and 625 (41.4%) of 1,509 of patients, whereas 46 (3.0%) of 1,509 had elevated vitamin D. There was no relationship between baseline vitamin D levels or change in vitamin D levels and cardiovascular events or mortality. Modeling of events with vitamin D as a continuous variable similarly showed no relationship of vitamin D to events. These findings held true after adjustment for seasonal variations in vitamin D and other confounders. Conclusion: In statin-treated patients with stable coronary heart disease, vitamin D levels did not predict cardiovascular risk. Changes in plasma concentrations of vitamin D after 1 year of treatment made no contribution to the efficacy of atorvastatin therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study to determine if patients with stable coronary artery disease carrying the KIF6 719Arg allele are at an increased risk of future events and whether they obtain more benefit from high-dose statin therapy.The occurrence of major cardiovascular events (MCVE) was chosen as primary outcome measure. It concludes that carriers of the KIF6 719 Arg allele were not at increased cardiovascular risk and have no consistent cardiovascular benefit from high-dose statin therapy. INSET: CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE.

Summary: Statins have been shown to reduce cardiovascular events across a broad spectrum of patients at risk, irrespective of baseline LDL-cholesterol levels. In a meta-analysis of 14 statin trials involving more than 90,000 participants, statin therapy reduced the 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events by about 20% for each mmol/L of LDL-cholesterol reduction. The results of the Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) study suggest that the degree of reduction in Japanese subjects may be greater than this for the same degree of LDL-cholesterol reduction. Given the success of statins in preventing cardiovascular events, it is not surprising that they have been tested in a variety of related conditions, three of which are discussed in this article. Heart failure is characterized by inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and neurohumeral activation, conditions that are ameliorated by statin therapy. The Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure (CORONA) showed no significant benefit of rosuvastatin upon the primary endpoint, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. However, subgroups identified by the biomarkers plasma amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic and C-reactive protein showed a reduction in events. Aortic stenosis and atherosclerosis share common risk factors, including hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Although non-randomized cohort studies have suggested that statins slow the progression of aortic stenosis, this was not shown in either of the two randomized placebo-controlled trials testing this hypothesis. Similarly, Alzheimer''s disease shares many risk factors with atherosclerosis, and several observational studies have reported a lower risk of developing this condition in patients taking statins. However, two recently completed clinical trials indicate that neither atorvastatin nor simvastatin slow the progression of early Alzheimer''s disease. In conclusion, although statins are effective, established therapy for the prevention of vascular events in patients at risk, they have as yet not proven to be successful for these newer indications. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Differences between women and men have been documented for both diagnostic testing and treatment in cardiology. This analysis evaluates whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) success rates according to current guidelines and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels differ by gender in the L-TAP 2 population. Methods: Patients aged ≥20 years with dyslipidemia on stable lipid-lowering therapy were assessed in 9 countries between September 2006 and April 2007. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment by cardiovascular risk level and region and determinants of low HDL-C were compared between genders. Results: Of 9,955 patients (45.3% women) evaluated, women had a significantly lower overall LDL-C success rate than men (71.5% vs 73.7%, P = .014), due entirely to the difference in the high-risk/coronary heart disease (CHD) group (LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL, 62.6% vs 70.6%, P < .0001) Among CHD patients with ≥2 additional risk factors, only 26.7% of women and 31.5% of men (P = .021) attained the optional LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was <50 mg/dL in 32.2% of women and <40 mg/dL in 26.8% of men (P < .0001), including 38.2% of women and 29.8% of men in the high risk/CHD group (P < .0001). Predictors of low HDL-C in women included diabetes, smoking, waist circumference, and hypertension. Conclusions: Cholesterol treatment has improved substantially since the original L-TAP a decade ago, when only 39% of women attained their LDL-C goal. However, high-risk women are undertreated compared to men, and a substantial opportunity remains to reduce their cardiovascular risk. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial enrolled 10,001 patients with coronary disease to treatment with atorvastatin, 80 or 10 mg/d, and observed them for a median of 4.9 years. Mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were 77 mg/dL in the 80-mg group and 101 mg/dL in the 10-mg group. The primary end point, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infraction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and stroke, occurred in 10.9% of patients in the 10-mg and 8.7% of patients in the 80-mg group (P = .0002). In large subgroups of patients in TNT, specifically those with diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, or previous coronary bypass (CABG) surgery, the risk of an event was significantly higher than in patients without these features. The absolute risk reduction in the 80-mg group was greater in each of these subgroups than in other TNT patients. The rates of stroke and hospitalization for heart failure were significantly lower in the more aggressively treated patients. A total of 18,696 patients have taken 80 mg of atorvastatin in clinical trials, usually for 4 to 5 years, with an excellent safety record. Pharmacoeconomic studies indicate that treatment with the 80-mg dose instead of the 10-mg dose almost costs neutral in US TNT-like patients (additional cost $181 for 5 years). In summary, wider use of the 80-mg dose of atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease is safe, cost-effective, and provides an incremental reduction in coronary events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Growing evidence suggests that elevated cholesterol levels in mid-life are associated with increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and that statins might have a protective effect against AD and dementia. The Lipitor’s Effect in Alzheimer’s Dementia (LEADe) study tests the hypothesis that a statin (atorvastatin 80 mg daily) will provide a benefit on the course of mild to moderate AD in patients receiving background therapy of a cholinesterase inhibitor (donepezil 10 mg daily). Methods: This is an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study with a double-blind randomized withdrawal phase of patients with mild to moderate AD (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score, 13 to 25). Inclusion criteria included age 50 to 90 years, receiving donepezil 10 mg for at least 3 months before randomization, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (LDL-C) 2.5 to 3.5 mmol/L (95 to 195 mg/dL). Co-primary end points are changes in AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and AD Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) scale scores. A confirmatory end point is rate of change in whole brain and hippocampal volumes in patients who enrolled in the magnetic resonance imaging substudy. Results: Enrollment of 641 subjects is complete. The baseline mean data are age 74 ± 8 years, 53% women, MMSE 22 ± 3, ADAS-cog 23 ± 10, AD Functional Assessment and Change Scale (ADFACS) 13 ± 9, Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) 10 ± 11, and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) 6 ± 3. Mean prior donepezil treatment was 409 ± 407 days. Mean baseline lipid levels are total cholesterol 5.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L (224 ± 33 mg/dL), LDL-C 3.7 ± 0.7 mmol/L (143 ± 26 mg/dL), triglycerides 1.5 ± 0.7 mmol/L (132 ± 64 mg/dL), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 1.6 ± 0.5 mmol/L (64 ± 18 mg/dL). Conclusions: LEADe will report in 2008 and is expected to provide a more definitive evaluation of the potential for statins in the treatment of people with AD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Statin therapy has been shown to effectively lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and reduce cardiovascular events. Statins also appear to exert other favorable effects, including anti-inflammatory actions and improvement in endothelial function. Statin therapy may therefore yield important clinical benefits in patients with heart failure—a physiologic state characterized by systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Methods and Results: This review summarizes basic and clinical investigations regarding the role of statin therapy in heart failure, focusing on potential mechanisms and preliminary clinical data. There is now extensive evidence suggesting that statins improve endothelial function, inhibit neurohormonal activation, restore autonomic balance, reduce inflammation, and prevent ventricular remodeling. Retrospective and small-scale prospective studies suggest that statins prevent the development of heart failure and reduce mortality in patients with established HF. Conclusion: Preliminary evidence supports a role for statins in improving surrogate markers and clinical outcomes in ischemic and nonischemic heart failure. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to definitively address this important topic. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Atherosclerosis is increasingly viewed as an inflammatory process. A number of infectious agents have been implicated in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease. Chlamydia pneumoniae has been the most popular and well-studied of these pathogens. It is difficult to prove a causal relationship which requires the fulfillment of Koch''s postulates, first developed in the late 1800s, to establish an infectious agent as the cause of a disease process. This paper reviews the evidence for and against Chlamydia pneumoniae infection as a contributing factor to atherosclerosis disease. It examines seroepidemiologic and histopathologic studies as well as animal models using Koch''s postulates and then provides an analysis of current clinical trial data. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]