Search

Intensive care unit (ICU) stay for a serious illness has a long-term impact on patients' physical and psychological well-being, affecting their ability to return to their everyday life. We aimed to investigate whether there are differences in health status between those who return to work and those who do not, and how demographic characteristics and illness severity impact patients' ability to return to work 12 months after intensive care for COVID-19. This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study. The participants were patients who had been in intensive care for COVID-19 and had worked before contracting COVID-19. Data on return to previous occupational status, demographic data, comorbidities, intensive care characteristics, and health status were collected at a 12-month follow-up visit. General ICU at the Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden. Seventy-three participants were included in the study. Twelve months after discharge from the ICU, 77 % (n = 56) had returned to work. The participants who were unable to return to work reported more severe health symptoms. The (odds ratio [OR] for not returning to work was high for critical illness OR, 12.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.07–70.29, p = 0.006) and length of ICU stay (OR, 1.06; 95 % CI, 1.01–1.11, p = 0.01) Two-thirds of the participants were able to return to work within 1 year after discharge from the ICU. The primary factors contributing to the failure to work were duration of the acute disease and presence of severe and persistent long-term symptoms. Patients' health status must be comprehensively assessed and their ability to return to work should be addressed in the rehabilitation process. Therefore, any complications faced by the patients must be identified and treated early to increase the possibility of their successful return to work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fatigue is a common symptom in former intensive care unit patients. Earlier research suggests that it is a lasting problem. This study aimed to further investigate the incidence of fatigue through the Multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) up to three years post intensive care. In this prospective longitudinal study 56 former patients accepted inclusion and 55 patients filled out the questionnaire MFI-20 on one, two or three occasions; 49 at the visit at the post intensive care clinic, 21 after one year and 29 at three years after discharge from intensive care. MFI-20 can be interpreted through its total score or divided into five sub scores: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation and mental fatigue. Baseline characteristics were collected, and statistical significance was measured with the help of SPSS software. The median ages for the three time points were 59, 61 and 62 respectively. There were more men in each group; 59, 57 and 62 %, but there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Based on the total fatigue score 67 % (n = 33) had severe fatigue 2–9 months after intensive care. The incidence of severe fatigue for one and three years was 48 % (n = 10) and 45 % (n = 13). Younger patients had significantly higher fatigue scores in general fatigue, reduced motivation and total score at the first two time points. After one year they also had significantly higher scores in the reduced activity subscale. Women had significantly higher fatigue scores than men in mental fatigue. Fatigue is a common symptom in intensive care patients up to three years post intensive care. Younger patients have higher fatigue scores than older patients up to one year after intensive care. Healthcare professionals in hospitals and in out-patient care need knowledge about fatigue in former critically ill patients in order to support the management of their fatigue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute coronary syndrome is a common cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In patients with OHCA presenting with ST elevation, immediate coronary angiography and potential percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after return of spontaneous circulation are recommended. However, the evidence for this invasive strategy in patients without ST elevation is limited. Observational studies have shown a culprit coronary artery occlusion in about 30% of these patients, indicating the electrocardiogram's (ECG's) limited sensitivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether immediate coronary angiography and subsequent PCI will provide outcome benefits in OHCA patients without ST elevation.Methods/design: We describe the design of the DIrect or Subacute Coronary angiography in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study (DISCO)-a pragmatic national, multicenter, randomized, clinical study. OHCA patients presenting with no ST elevation on their first recorded ECG will be randomized to a strategy of immediate coronary angiography or to standard of care with admission to intensive care and angiography after 3days at the earliest unless the patient shows signs of acute ischemia or hemodynamic instability. Primary end point is 30-day survival. An estimated 1,006 patients give 80% power (α = .05) to detect a 20% improved 30-day survival rate from 45% to 54%. Secondary outcomes include good neurologic recovery at 30days and 6months, and cognitive function and cardiac function at 6months.Conclusion: This randomized clinical study will evaluate the effect of immediate coronary angiography after OHCA on 30-day survival in patients without ST elevation on their first recorded ECG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to describe the burden of illness and impact on health and working situation among former intensive care patients treated for COVID-19. A prospective cohort study was performed at one intensive care unit of a university hospital in Sweden during the first wave of COVID-19 in spring 2020. The burden of illness in health status, cognitive, physical, and psychological outcomes, and working situation were assessed at four and 12 months after discharge from intensive care, using nine validated instruments. Forty-six participants treated for COVID-19 participated in both follow-ups and were included in this study. General fatigue was reported by 37 of 46 participants (82%) at both follow-ups (p = 1.000). For overall health status 28 (61%) participants at the first follow-up and 26 (57%) (p = 0.414) at the second reported lower values than the general population. Cognitive impairment was seen in 22 (52%) participants at four months and in 13 (31%) at 12 months (p = 0.029). The proportion of participants on sick-leave decreased between the first and second follow-up (24% vs 13%, p = 0.025), but the proportion of participants working full-time was almost the same at both follow-ups (35% vs 37%, p = 0.317). The burden of illness of patients treated in intensive care due to COVID-19 included cognitive, physical, and psychological impacts. Cognitive functions were improved after 12 months, but no clear improvements could be distinguished in the physical or psychological outcome. Higher burden of illness was associated with inability to return to work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To describe the results of use of structured daily reflection assessments among healthcare workers at an intensive care unit over the course of one year. In this descriptive retrospective study, data were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The data encompassed 1095 work shifts, evaluated by healthcare workers at an intensive care unit using a structured daily reflection instrument. The areas evaluated were patient safety, workload and work environment, and free-text comments were possible. The results showed that 36% (n = 395) of work shifts, most of them daytime shifts (44%; n = 161), were affected. Workload was the area that affected most work shifts (29%; n = 309). Missed nursing care, complex care and inaccurate communication impacted patient safety, while patient care, multitasking and working conditions affected workload. Work environment was impacted by organisational factors, environment, lack of control and moral stress. Using daily reflection among healthcare workers in the intensive care unit illuminated areas that affect patient safety, workload, and work environment. The importance of communication and collaboration and how they can impact patient safety, workload, and the work environment were highlighted by the team. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]