Search

The article presents a study which evaluated the morphology of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) through the use of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE). The study was conducted through the use of an iE33 ultrasound imaging system from Massachusetts-based Philips Medical Systems. It claims that the RVOT generally includes the subpulmonary infundibulum, or conus, and the pulmonary valve.

Diastolic heart failure is increasing in prevalence. Although the pathophysiology is incompletely understood and current therapeutic strategies are limited, identification of diastolic dysfunction is important. We review the role of contemporary techniques with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) in the assessment of diastolic dysfunction. Cardiac catheterization is the criterion standard for demonstrating impaired relaxation and filling by making direct measurements; however, echocardiography has replaced it as the most clinically used tool. By evaluating mitral inflow pulsed-wave Doppler with and without the Valsalva maneuver, isovolumetric relaxation time, pulmonary venous flow Doppler, color M-mode velocity propagation, tissue Doppler imaging, and speckle tracking, echocardiography is considered an accurate method for diagnosis and grading diastolic dysfunction. Evaluation of diastolic function can also be performed by CMRI. Mitral valve inflow velocities, early deceleration time, and pulmonary vein flow velocities are diastolic parameters that can be measured by phase-contrast CMRI. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging steady-state gradient echo can evaluate functional dimensions for time-volume curves; and myocardial tagging can assess ventricular diastolic “untwisting,” which may be important for improved pathophysiologic understanding. Studies have compared echocardiography and CMRI for diagnosing diastolic dysfunction in small patient groups with similar results. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can now provide clinically relevant data regarding the underlying cause of diastolic dysfunction and offers promise to gain mechanistic insights for therapeutic strategy development and clinical trial planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement of proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) and vena contracta (VC) for differentiating severe from nonsevere mitral regurgitation (MR). Background: Recommendation for MR evaluation stresses the importance of VC width and effective regurgitant orifice area by PISA measurements. Reliable and accurate assessment of MR is important for clinical decision making regarding corrective surgery. We hypothesize that color Doppler-based quantitative measurements for classifying MR as severe versus nonsevere may be particularly susceptible to interobserver agreement. Methods: The PISA and VC measurements of 16 patients with MR were interpreted by 18 echocardiologists from 11 academic institutions. In addition, we obtained quantitative assessment of MR based on color flow Doppler jet area. Results: The overall interobserver agreement for grading MR as severe or nonsevere using qualitative and quantitative parameters was similar and suboptimal: 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1 to 0.52) for jet area–based MR grade, 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.45) for VC measurements, and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.58) for PISA measurements. Significant univariate predictors of substantial interobserver agreement for: 1) jet area–based MR grade was functional etiology (p = 0.039); 2) VC was central MR (p = 0.013) and identifiable effective regurgitant orifice (p = 0.049); and 3) PISA was presence of a central MR jet (p = 0.003), fixed proximal flow convergence (p = 0.025), and functional etiology (p = 0.049). Significant multivariate predictors of raw interobserver agreement ≥80% included: 1) for VC, identifiable effective regurgitant orifice (p = 0.035); and 2) for PISA, central regurgitant jet (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The VC and PISA measurements for distinction of severe versus nonsevere MR are only modestly reliable and associated with suboptimal interobserver agreement. The presence of an identifiable effective regurgitant orifice improves reproducibility of VC and a central regurgitant jet predicts substantial agreement among multiple observers of PISA assessment. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]