Search

Cocaine stimulates significant increases in luteinizing hormone (LH) and decreases prolactin levels in gonadally intact rhesus monkeys, but cocaine did not alter plasma levels of these anterior pituitary hormones in ovariectomized females. These findings suggested that ovarian steroid hormones may contribute to the endocrine effects of acute cocaine administration. To test this hypothesis, the acute effects of cocaine and placebo-cocaine on plasma LH and prolactin levels were examined in five ovariectomized rhesus females during three chronic hormone replacement conditions: 1) estradiol (E2beta) treatment (0.0015-0.006 mg/kg/day i.m.), 2) progesterone treatment (0.32 mg/kg/day i.m.), and 3) combinations of progesterone (0.32 mg/kg/day i.m.) and E2beta (0.002 and 0.004 mg/kg/day i.m.). Cocaine (0.8 mg/kg i.v.) did not alter prolactin or LH in ovariectomized monkeys without ovarian steroid replacement. During chronic estradiol treatment, cocaine produced an estradiol dose-dependent decrease in prolactin. Cocaine also decreased prolactin during treatment with progesterone alone and progesterone + E2beta (0.004 mg/kg/day i.m.). Cocaine stimulated a significant increase in LH during treatment with progesterone alone, but not during treatment with progesterone + E2beta, or three of four estradiol treatment doses. Cocaine pharmacokinetics did not differ as a function of hormone replacement conditions. Together, these data suggest that both E2beta and progesterone modulate cocaine's effects on prolactin, whereas E2beta alone and in combination with progesterone, do not facilitate LH release in response to cocaine in ovariectomized rhesus females.

Agonists at delta, mu, and kappa opioid receptors produce interacting effects in rodents and nonhuman primates. To further evaluate the determinants of these interactions, this study examined the effects of mixtures of delta + mu and delta + kappa agonists in rhesus monkeys (n = 4-5) using two behavioral procedures, an assay of schedule-controlled responding for food reinforcement and an assay of thermal nociception. Results were analyzed using dose-addition analysis. In the assay of schedule-controlled responding, the delta agonist (+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxy-benzyl]-N,N-diethyl-benzamide (SNC80); the mu agonists methadone, fentanyl, morphine, and nalbuphine; and the kappa agonists (5alpha,7alpha,8beta)-(-)-N-methyl-N-(7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro(4,5)dec-8-yl) benzeneacetamide (U69,593) and bremazocine all dose dependently decreased rates of food-maintained responding when administered alone. Fixed ratio mixtures of SNC80 + mu agonists produced additive or subadditive effects, whereas SNC80 + kappa agonist mixtures produced only additive effects. In the assay of thermal nociception, SNC80 produced no measurable effects when administered alone, whereas mu and kappa agonists produced dose-dependent antinociception. SNC80 + mu agonist mixtures produced superadditive effects manifested as leftward shifts in mu agonist dose-effect curves. This synergism was antagonized by the delta-selective antagonist naltrindole, suggesting that SNC80-induced enhancement of mu agonist antinociception was delta receptor-mediated. SNC80 did not enhance the antinociceptive effects of the highly selective kappa agonist U69,593, and it produced only a marginal enhancement of antinociception produced by the less selective kappa agonist bremazocine. These results suggest that delta agonists may selectively enhance the antinociceptive effects of mu agonists in rhesus monkeys. These results also confirm that opioid agonist interactions may depend on the receptor selectivity and relative doses of the agonists and on the experimental endpoint.

It has been suggested that heroin and morphine may act on different opioid receptor populations in rodents. In support of this hypothesis, the opioid antagonist 3-methoxynaltrexone was reported to be more potent as an antagonist of the antinociceptive effects of heroin than of morphine in mice and rats. To assess the generality of this finding across species and experimental endpoints, the present study compared the potencies of naltrexone and 3-methoxynaltrexone as antagonists of heroin and morphine in two behavioral assays in rhesus monkeys. In the thermal nociception study, tail-withdrawal latencies were measured from water heated to 50 degrees C. In the heroin discrimination study, monkeys were trained to discriminate 0.1 mg/kg heroin from saline in a two-key, food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure, and percentage of heroin-appropriate responding and response rates were measured. Both heroin and morphine produced dose-dependent antinociception, increases in percentage of heroin-appropriate responding, and decreases in response rates. Heroin was approximately 20-fold more potent than morphine. Naltrexone (0.032-0.1 mg/kg) was equipotent in antagonizing all effects of heroin and morphine (pA(2) values = 7.90-8.22). 3-Methoxynaltrexone (0.1-3.2 mg/kg) was also equipotent in antagonizing the antinociceptive, discriminative stimulus, and rate-suppressant effects of heroin and morphine; however, 3-methoxynaltrexone was approximately 100-fold less potent than naltrexone (pA(2)/pK(B) values = 5.96-6.36). These results suggest that heroin and morphine act on pharmacologically similar populations of opioid receptors in rhesus monkeys, and also indicate that 3-methoxynaltrexone does not differentially antagonize the effects of heroin and morphine in rhesus monkeys.

Mu-opioid agonists decrease cocaine self-administration in laboratory studies and cocaine use by many cocaine- and opioid-dependent polydrug abusers. To assess the role of mu-agonist efficacy as a determinant of these effects, this study evaluated cocaine- and food-maintained responding by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during chronic treatment with saline or the high-efficacy mu-agonist fentanyl (0.001-0.01 mg/kg/h), the intermediate-efficacy mu-agonist morphine (0.032-0.32 mg/kg/h), or the low-efficacy mu-agonists nalbuphine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg/h) and butorphanol (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h). Responding was maintained by cocaine and food under a second order schedule of reinforcement during multiple daily sessions of cocaine and food availability. Saline and each opioid dose were administered continuously for 7 consecutive days during availability of each cocaine dose. All four mu-agonists produced dose-dependent and sustained decreases in cocaine self-administration across a range of cocaine doses (0.0032-0.1 mg/kg/injection). Nalbuphine and butorphanol produced the greatest decreases in cocaine self-administration and the smallest effects on food-maintained responding. Morphine and fentanyl produced smaller decreases in cocaine self-administration, and undesirable effects precluded evaluation of higher fentanyl and morphine doses. Decreases in cocaine self-administration produced by nalbuphine and butorphanol probably did not reflect a general blockade of cocaine's abuse-related effects, because nalbuphine and butorphanol did not block the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in monkeys trained to discriminate 0.4 mg/kg cocaine from saline in a food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. These results suggest that low-efficacy mu-agonists may decrease cocaine self-administration to a greater degree and with fewer undesirable effects than high-efficacy mu-agonists.

Kappa opioid receptors derive their name from the prototype benzomorphan, ketocyclazocine (1a) which was found to produce behavioral effects that were distinct from the behavioral effects of morphine but that were antagonized by the opioid antagonist, naltrexone. Recent evidence suggests that agonists and antagonists at kappa opioid receptors may modulate the activity of dopaminergic neurons and alter the neurochemical and behavioral effects of cocaine. Kappa agonists blocked the effects of cocaine in squirrel monkeys in studies of cocaine discrimination and scheduled-controlled responding. Studies in rhesus monkeys suggested that kappa opioids may antagonize the reinforcing effects of cocaine. These studies prompted the synthesis and evaluation of a series of kappa agonists related to the morphinan, l-cyclorphan (3a) and the benzomorphan, l-cyclazocine (2). We describe the synthesis and preliminary evaluation of a series of morphinans, structural analogs of cyclorphan 3a–c, the 10-keto morphinans 4aand b, and the 8-keto benzomorphan 1b, structurally related to ketocyclazocine (1a). In binding experiments l-cyclorphan (3a), the cyclobutyl (3b), the tetrahydrofurfuryl 3cand the 10-keto 4banalogs had high affinity for mu(μ), delta(δ) and kappa(κ) opioid receptors. Both 3aand 3bwere more selective for the κ receptor than the μ receptor. However, 3bwas 18-fold more selective for the κ receptor in comparison to the δ receptor, while cyclorphan (3a) had only a 4-fold greater affinity for the κ receptor in comparison to the δ receptor. The cyclobutyl compound 3bwas found to have significant μ agonist properties, while 3awas a μ antagonist. All compounds were also examined in the mouse tail flick and writhing assay. Compounds 3aand 3bwere κ agonists. Correlating with the binding results, compound 3ahad some δ agonist properties, while 3bwas devoid of any activity at the δ receptor. In addition, compounds 3aand 3bhad opposing properties at the μ opioid receptor. The cyclobutyl compound 3bwas found to have significant μ agonist properties, while 3awas a μ antagonist.

The opioid antagonist effects of systemically administered nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) were evaluated against the kappa agonists CI-977, U69,593, U50,488, ethylketocyclazocine (EKC), Mr2034 and bremazocine, the mu agonist morphine and the alkaloid delta agonist BW-373U86 in the acetic acid-induced writhing assay in mice. All eight agonists completely and dose-dependently inhibited writhing. Antagonism of CI-977 was apparent 1 h after administration of 32 mg/kg nor-BNI, peaking after 4 h and was maintained for at least 4 weeks; no antagonist effects of nor-BNI were apparent after 8 weeks. Nor-BNI (32 mg/kg) caused little or no antagonism of morphine or BW-373U86 at 1 h and none at 24 h after nor-BNI administration. Subsequently, dose-effect curves for CI-977, U50,488, U69,593, EKC, Mr2034 and bremazocine were determined 24 h after pretreatment with 3.2, 10 and 32 mg/kg nor-BNI. Pretreatment with 3.2 mg/kg nor-BNI produced significant antagonism of all six kappa agonists, suggesting that their antinociceptive effects were mediated at least in part by nor-BNI-sensitive kappa receptors. At higher doses, nor-BNI dose-depend-ently shifted the agonist dose-effect curves of CI-977, U50,488, U69,593 and bremazocine, but not those of EKC and Mr2034, suggesting that the latter compounds may be producing effects via nor-BNI-insensitive receptors. Mu receptor involvement was demonstrated following a 24 h pretreatment with 32 mg/kgβ-FNA in combination with nor-BNI, which significantly increased the degree of antagonism of Mr2034 and EKC from that seen with nor-BNI alone. Hence, SC administered nor-BNI selectively antagonized agonist activity mediated through kappaopioid receptors without differentiating between kappa subtypes. Nor-BNI also enabled the mu agonist activity of proposed kappa agonists to be measured.