1. Chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy as first-line treatment in patients with luminal-like HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: A propensity score analysis.
- Author
-
Bonotto, Marta, Gerratana, Lorenzo, Di Maio, Massimo, De Angelis, Carmine, Cinausero, Marika, Moroso, Stefano, Milano, Monica, Stanzione, Brigida, Gargiulo, Piera, Iacono, Donatella, Minisini, Alessandro Marco, Mansutti, Mauro, Fasola, Gianpiero, De Placido, Sabino, Arpino, Grazia, and Puglisi, Fabio
- Subjects
BREAST cancer treatment ,HORMONE therapy ,CANCER chemotherapy ,HER2 gene ,DRUG therapy ,CLINICAL trials - Abstract
Background According to current guidelines, endocrine therapy (ET) is recommended as first-line treatment of luminal-like metastatic breast cancer (MBC), whereas chemotherapy (CT) should be considered in presence of life-threatening disease. In daily practice, CT is often used outside of this clinical circumstance. Factors influencing first-line choice and the relative impact on outcome are unknown. Methods A consecutive series of luminal-like HER2-negative MBC patients treated from 2004 to 2014 was analyzed to test the association of disease- and patient-related factors with the choice of first-line treatment (ET vs. CT). A propensity score method was used to estimate impact of first-line strategy on outcome. Results Of 604 consecutive luminal-like MBC patients identified, 158 cases were excluded due to unknown or positive HER2-status. Among 446 HER2-negative cases, 171 (38%) received first-line CT. On multivariate analysis, the only factors significantly associated with lower CT use were old age (OR 0.25, 95%C.I. 0.13–0.49) or presence of bone metastases only (OR 0.26, 95%C.I. 0.13–0.53). In propensity score matched population, no differences were observed between CT and ET as first-line treatment either in terms of overall survival (37.5 months and 33.4 months respectively, log-rank test, P = 0.62) or progression-free survival (13.3 months and 9.9 months respectively, log-rank test, P = 0.92). Conclusions High percentage of patients with luminal-like MBC received CT as first-line therapy in real-life. The choice was mainly driven by age and site of metastases. With the limitations of a non-randomized comparison, no differences on patients' outcome were observed depending on the first-line strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF