Search

Topoisomerase I inhibitors are interesting anti-cancer agents with a novel mechanism of action. We performed a phase I study with intravenous GI147211, a new semisynthetic camptothecin analogue, using a daily x 5 schedule administered every 3 weeks, to evaluate the side-effects and pharmacokinetics of the agent. Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of a solid tumour refractory to standard froms of therapy were eligible for the study. GI147211 was given as a 30 min intravenous infusion daily for 5 consecutive days, repeated every 3 weeks. In subsequent patient cohorts the dose was escalated from 0.3 to 1.5 mg m-2 day-1. Pharmacokinetics analysis was performed on days 1 and 4 of the first course using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and non-compartmental methods. A total of 19 patients were entered into the study, one patient was not evaluable for toxicity because only one drug administration was given. Eighteen patients received a total of 67 courses through four dose levels. The dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia at the dose of 1.5 mg m-2 day-1. Nadirs occurred on day 15 and day 15 respectively. Other toxicities were mild and infrequent and included nausea/vomiting, headache and alopecia. The maximal tolerated dose was 1.2 mg m-2 day-1. One partial response was observed in a patient with colorectal cancer. The total plasma clearance was 999+/-184 ml min-1 (range 640-1329). The volume of distribution was 190+/-461 m-2 and the terminal half-life was 3.7+/-1.2 h. The AUC increased linearly with the administered dose. A steep and significant sigmoid relationship was established between the AUC and the percent decrease of ANC. GI147211 is a new topoisomerase I inhibitor that induced dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in this phase I study. The recommended dose for phase II studies with this schedule is 1.2 mg m-2 x 5 every 3 weeks.

We investigated the pharmacokinetic profile and the efficacy of ondansetron (day 1) given as 16 mg suppository once a day, as compared with ondansetron 8 mg tablets twice daily, in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The study was primarily aimed at investigating the pharmacokinetics and was part of a large multinational, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy efficacy trial. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained in a total of 20 patients, 11 of whom had received a suppository containing ondansetron, and nine patients had received the oral formulation. The median area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) obtained with the oral formulation was 226 ng ml-1h-1 (range 91-750), and the median maximum plasma level (Cmax) was 50.5 ng ml-1 (range 24.7-199.6) after a dose of 8 mg. For the ondansetron suppository the median AUC was 140 ng ml-1h-1 range (77-405) and the median Cmax was 17.1 ng ml-1 (range 13-48.3) after a dose of 16 mg. The systemic exposure after correction for the dose difference after the suppository was on average 70% lower than after the tablet. The median time to reach the maximum level (Tmax) was 60 min (range 28-120) with the oral formulation and 209 min (range 90-420) with the suppository. For both the tablet and suppository, there was no apparent relationship between either Cmax or AUC, and efficacy. Although the patient numbers were too small for a formal exposure-response relationship to be derived, the slightly poorer pharmacokinetic performance of the suppository did not appear to be associated with a lessening of control of emesis following chemotherapy. The study demonstrates that the pharmacokinetic analysis of a once-daily 16 mg ondansetron suppository results in appropriate plasma concentrations and AUC, and that this rectal formulation is effective in the protection against nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. This formulation will provide a useful alternative to the currently available oral formulation.

In order to unravel possible mechanisms of clinical resistance to topoisomerase I inhibitors, we developed a topotecan-resistant human IGROV-1 ovarian cancer cell line, denoted IGROV(T100r), by stepwise increased exposure to topotecan (TPT). The IGROV(T100r) cell line was 29-fold resistant to TPT and strongly cross-resistant to SN-38 (51-fold). However, the IGROV(T100r) showed only threefold resistance to camptothecin (CPT). Remarkably, this cell line was 32-fold resistant to mitoxantrone, whereas no significant cross-resistance against other cytostatic drugs was observed. No differences in topoisomerase I protein levels and catalytic activity as well as topoisomerase I cleavable complex stabilization by CPT in the IGROV-1 and IGROV(T100r) cell lines were observed, indicating that resistance in the IGROV(T100r) cell line was not related to topoisomerase I-related changes. However, resistance in the resistant IGROV(T100r) cell line to TPT and SN-38 was accompanied by decreased accumulation of the drugs to approximately 15% and 36% of that obtained in IGROV-1 respectively. No reduced accumulation was observed for CPT. Notably, accumulation of TPT in the IGROV-1 cell line decreased under energy-deprived conditions, whereas the accumulation in the IGROV(T100r) cell line increased under these energy-deprived conditions. The efflux of TPT at 37 degrees C was very rapid in the IGROV-1 as well as the IGROV(T100r) cell line, resulting in 90% efflux within 20 min. Importantly, the efflux rates of TPT in the IGROV-1 and IGROV(T100r) cell lines were not significantly different and were shown to be independent on P-glycoprotein (P-gp) or multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP). These results strongly suggest that the resistance of the IGROV(T100r) cell line to TPT and SN-38 is mainly caused by reduced accumulation. The reduced accumulation appears to be mediated by a novel mechanism, probably related to impaired energy-dependent uptake of these topoisomerase I drugs.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors constitute a new class of anti-cancer agents. Recently, topotecan and irinotecan were registered for clinical use in ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer respectively. Cytotoxicity of topoisomerase I inhibitors is S-phase specific, and in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that, for efficacy, prolonged exposure might be more important than short-term exposure to high concentration. Clinical development of those topoisomerase I inhibitors that have reached this stage is also focused on schedules aiming to achieve prolonged exposure. In this review, we summarize all published preclinical studies on this topic for topoisomerase I inhibitors in clinical development, namely 20-S-camptothecin, 9-nitro-camptothecin, 9-amino-camptothecin, topotecan, irinotecan and GI147211. In addition, preliminary data on clinical studies concerning this topic are also reviewed. The data suggest that prolonged exposure may indeed be relevant for anti-tumour activity. However, the optimal schedule is yet to be determined. Finally, clinical data are yet too immature to draw definitive conclusions.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors are new compounds of interest for cancer chemotherapy. We performed a study with GI147211, a new semisynthetic camptothecin analogue, to determine the absolute bioavailability of the drug given orally. Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of a solid tumour refractory to standard forms of therapy were eligible for the study. GI147211 was given orally on day 1 and as a 30-min infusion daily on days 2-5. The treatment course was repeated every 3 weeks. In subsequent patient cohorts, the dose of the oral formulation was escalated from 1.5 mg m(-2) to 6.0 mg m(-2); the dose for i.v. administration was fixed at 1.2 mg m(-2). Plasma pharmacokinetics was performed on day 1 and 2 of the first course and on day 1 of the second course using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. Nineteen patients were entered into the study; one patient was not evaluable because the treatment course was stopped prematurely. Eighteen patients received a total of 47 treatment courses. The absolute bioavailability of GI147211 averaged 1.3 +/- 5.2%. Drug appeared quickly in plasma with a median Tmax at 0.5 h. Fasting or fed state had no significant influence on the bioavailability of GI147211. The terminal half-life after administration of oral GI147211 was 6.85 +/- 3.13 h, similar to the half-life after intravenous administration. The major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Nadirs for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred on day 8 and day 15 respectively. Other toxicities predominantly consisted of mild and infrequent nausea and vomiting, and fatigue. The oral administration of the drug is well tolerated. Oral administration of topoisomerase I inhibitor GI147211 results in a low bioavailability with relatively wide interpatient variation. The intravenous route of administration is advised for further development of this promising topoisomerase I inhibitor.

DNA adduct levels were measured with atomic spectroscopy in white blood cells (WBCs) from patients with solid tumours who were treated with six weekly courses of cisplatin. In 21 patients (I) the WBCs were collected after thawing frozen whole-blood samples according to a previously described method. In 32 other patients (II) WBCs were collected immediately after blood sample collection. The two methods for WBC collection were also compared in vitro. The maximal DNA adduct levels in vivo after the first course were in I 2.48 +/- 1.14 and in II 1.28 +/- 0.40 pg of platinum per microgram of DNA (P < 0.0001). The DNA 'repair' in the first course (DNA adduct level at the end of the infusion minus the level 15 h post infusion) was in I 40% +/- 29% and in II 18% +/- 29% (P = 0.009). These differences were consistent in all measured courses. In vitro, the DNA adduct levels in the freshly prepared WBCs were significantly lower at 0, 1 and 4, but not 24 h, after start of the incubation with cisplatin than in the WBCs collected after freezing and thawing the blood sample. The same experiment with carboplatin in vitro also resulted in significantly lower adducts in freshly isolated WBCs. The higher DNA adduct levels and DNA 'repair' in I are caused by remaining unbound cisplatin in the sample tubes, which can form DNA adducts ex vivo. The same results in vivo can be anticipated when carboplatin is used.

The results of preclinical and clinical studies indicate enhanced antineoplastic activity of topotecan (SKF 104864-A) when administered as a chronic treatment. We determined the apparent bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of topotecan administered orally to 12 patients with solid tumours in a two-part crossover study. The oral dose of 1.5 mg m-2 was administered as a drinking solution of 200 ml on day 1. The i.v. dose of 1.5 mg m-2 was administered as a 30 min continuous infusion on day 2. The bioavailability was calculated as the ratio of the oral to i.v. area under the curve (AUC) calculated up to the last measured time point. The oral drinking solution was well tolerated. The bioavailability revealed moderate inter-patient variation and was 30% +/- 7.7% (range 21-45%). The time to maximum plasma concentration after oral administration (Tmax) was 0.78 h (median; range 0.33-2.5). Total i.v. plasma clearance of topotecan was 824 +/- 154 ml min-1 (range 535-1068 ml min(-1)). The AUC ratio of topotecan and the lactone ring-opened hydrolysis product (hydroxy acid) was of the same order after oral (0.34-1.13) and i.v. (0.47-0.98) administration. The bioavailability of topotecan after oral administration illustrates significant systemic exposure to the drug which may enable chronic oral treatment.

The profiles of an i.v. bolus and 3 h and 20 h infusion of cisplatin (CDDP) were simulated in vitro by using a culture of the IGROV1 human ovarian cancer cell line. Disappearance of pharmacologically active unbound CDDP was accomplished by adding human albumin to the medium. Total and unbound CDDP and CDDP-DNA adduct levels were quantitated by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), and tumour cell survival was measured by the clonogenic assay. The design of the experiment resulted in non-significant differences in the magnitude of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of unbound CDDP between the three dose-input functions (AUC i.v. bolus, 6.34 +/- 0.36; 3 h infusion, 6.35 +/- 0.59; and 20 h infusion, 6.76 +/- 0.40 micrograms h ml-1). Also, the differences between the area under the CDDP-DNA adduct-time curves (AUA) of the three dose-input functions were not significant. The initial rate of decline of the CDDP-DNA adduct-time curve was significantly higher for the i.v. bolus and 3 h infusion than for the 20 h infusion. There was a log-linear relationship between the AUC of unbound CDDP and cell survival. These relationships were not significantly different between the three dose-input functions. Variation in the rate of input of CDDP leads to differences in the shape of the AUC and AUA without significant effects on cell survival.

The study was designed to investigate possible relationships between tumour response and exposure to cisplatin (area under the curve of unbound cisplatin in plasma, AUC) and DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes (WBC) in patients with solid tumours. Patients were treated with six weekly courses of cisplatin at a dose of 70 or 80 mg m-2. The AUC was determined during the first course and DNA-adduct levels in WBC during all courses at baseline, 1 h (A(max)) and 15 h after a 3 h infusion of cisplatin. The area under the DNA-adduct-time curve (AUA) was calculated. The tumour response was determined after six courses. Forty-five evaluable patients received 237 courses of cisplatin. Sixteen patients with head and neck cancer received a dose of 80 mg m-2 and 29 with various other tumour types received 70 mg m-2 plus daily 50 mg oral etoposide. There were 20 responders (partial and complete) and 25 non-responders (stable and progressive disease). The AUC was highly variable (mean +/- s.d. = 2.48 +/- 0.51 micrograms h-1 ml-1; range 1.10-3.82) and was closely correlated with the AUA (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001) and A(max) (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001). The AUC, AUA and A(max) were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders in the total population (P < 0.0001) and in the two subgroups treated at 70 or 80 mg m-2. In logistic regression analysis AUC, AUA and A(max) were important predictors of response. The magnitude of exposure to cisplatin is, through DNA-adduct formation, the major determinant of the response rate in this population. Hence, individualised dosing of cisplatin using AUC or DNA-adducts should lead to increased response rates.

Docetaxel and ifosfamide have shown significant activity against a variety of solid tumours. This prompted a phase I trial on the combination of these drugs. This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of the combination, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the side effects, and to propose a safe schedule for further phase II studies. A total of 34 patients with a histologically confirmed solid tumour, who were not pretreated with taxanes or ifosfamide and who had received no more than one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were entered into the study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel given as a 1-h infusion followed by ifosfamide as a 24-h infusion (schedule A), or ifosfamide followed by docetaxel (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Docetaxel doses ranged from 60 to 85 mg m(-2) and ifosfamide doses from 2.5 to 5.0 g m(-2). Granulocytopenia grade 3 and 4 were common (89%), short lasting and ifosfamide dose dependent. Febrile neutropenia and sepsis occurred in 17% and 2% of courses respectively. Non-haematological toxicities were mild to moderate and included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, diarrhoea, sensory neuropathy, skin and nail toxicity and oedema. There did not appear to be any pharmacokinetic interaction between docetaxel and ifosfamide. One complete response (CR) (soft tissue sarcoma) and two partial responses (PRs) were documented. A dose of 75 mg m(-2) of docetaxel combined with 5.0 g m(-2) ifosfamide appeared to be manageable. Schedule A was advocated for further treatment.