Search

Background Optimal pulmonary perfusion is crucial for a well-functioning Fontan circulation in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). To obtain an adequate size of the left pulmonary artery (LPA), patch enlargement is a routine part of the hemi-Fontan procedure in our center. However, LPA patch enlargement at the time of the modified Norwood procedure may have surgical advantages. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether anatomic and functional effects of the new approach are superior. Methods A total of 51 consecutive HLHS patients underwent a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study including assessment of LPA anatomy and lung perfusion. The LPA of 20 patients was enlarged during the modified Norwood procedure (group N) and of 31 patients during the hemi-Fontan procedure (group HF). Results The median indexed cross-sectional area of the LPA in group N was significantly higher than in group HF (49.5 versus 27.9 mm 2 /m 2 , p < 0.0001). The regional pulmonary perfusion as measured by first-pass, contrast-enhanced signal intensity upslope was significantly improved in group N (left side 0.67 s −1 versus 0.40 s −1 , p = 0.002; right side 0.84 s −1 versus 0.52 s −1 , p = 0.01). The total hemi-Fontan bypass and procedure times were significantly shorter in group N (both p < 0.001). Conclusions These first magnetic resonance imaging data show that HLHS patients after LPA patch enlargement during the modified Norwood procedure have significantly higher LPA cross-sectional areas and show improved lung perfusion and shorter overall procedure time as compared with LPA patching during second stage (hemi-Fontan). Therefore, this promising surgical technique may improve blood flow dynamics of the Fontan circulation in the long run. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Concentration-time courses measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging can be described by a convolution of the arterial input with an impulse response function, Q T(t), characterizing tissue microcirculation. Data analysis is based on two different approaches: computation of Q T(t) by algebraic deconvolution (AD) and subsequent evaluation according to the indicator dilution theory (IDT) or parameterization of Q T(t) by analytical expressions derived by compartmental modeling. Pitfalls of both strategies will be addressed in this study. Tissue data acquired by DCE-CT in patients with head-and-neck cancer and simulated by a reference model (MMID4) were analyzed by a two-compartment model (TCM), a permeability-limited two-compartment model (PL-TCM) and AD. Additionally, MMID4 was used to compute the ‘true’ response function that corresponds to the simulated tumor data. TCM and AD yielded accurate fits, whereas PL-TCM performed worse. Nevertheless, the corresponding response functions diverge markedly. The response curves obtained by TCM decrease exponentially in the early perfusion phase and overestimate the tissue perfusion, Q T(0). AD also resulted in response curves starting with a negative slope and not – as the ‘true’ response function in accordance with the IDT – with a horizontal plateau. They are thus not valid responses in the sense of the IDT that can be used unconditionally for parameter estimation. Response functions differing considerably in shape can result in virtually identical tissue curves. This non-uniqueness makes a strong argument not to use algebraic but rather analytical deconvolution to reduce the class of solutions to representatives that are in accordance with a-priori knowledge. To avoid misinterpretations and systematic errors, users must be aware of the pitfalls inherent to the different concepts. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]