14 results on '"Rubin, Nicholas C."'
Search Results
2. Fast Emulation of Fermionic Circuits with Matrix Product States.
- Author
-
Provazza, Justin, Gunst, Klaas, Zhai, Huanchen, Chan, Garnet K.-L., Shiozaki, Toru, Rubin, Nicholas C., and White, Alec F.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Fast Emulation of Fermionic Circuits with Matrix Product States
- Author
-
Provazza, Justin, Gunst, Klaas, Zhai, Huanchen, Chan, Garnet K.-L., Shiozaki, Toru, Rubin, Nicholas C., and White, Alec F.
- Abstract
We describe a matrix product state (MPS) extension for the Fermionic Quantum Emulator (FQE) software library. We discuss the theory behind symmetry-adapted MPSs for approximating many-body wave functions of spin-1/2 Fermions, and we present an open-source, MPS-enabled implementation of the FQE interface (MPS-FQE). The software uses the open-source pyblock3 and block2 libraries for most elementary tensor operations, and it can largely be used as a drop-in replacement for FQE that allows for more efficient but approximate emulation of larger Fermionic circuits. Finally, we show several applications relevant to both near-term and fault-tolerant quantum algorithms where approximate emulation of larger systems is expected to be useful: characterization of state preparation strategies for quantum phase estimation, the testing of different variational quantum eigensolver ansätze, the numerical evaluation of Trotter errors, and the simulation of general quantum dynamics problems. In all these examples, approximate emulation with MPS-FQE allows us to treat systems that are significantly larger than those accessible with a full statevector emulator.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Drug design on quantum computers
- Author
-
Santagati, Raffaele, Aspuru-Guzik, Alan, Babbush, Ryan, Degroote, Matthias, González, Leticia, Kyoseva, Elica, Moll, Nikolaj, Oppel, Markus, Parrish, Robert M., Rubin, Nicholas C., Streif, Michael, Tautermann, Christofer S., Weiss, Horst, Wiebe, Nathan, and Utschig-Utschig, Clemens
- Abstract
The promised industrial applications of quantum computers often rest on their anticipated ability to perform accurate, efficient quantum chemical calculations. Computational drug discovery relies on accurate predictions of how candidate drugs interact with their targets in a cellular environment involving several thousands of atoms at finite temperatures. Although quantum computers are still far from being used as daily tools in the pharmaceutical industry, here we explore the challenges and opportunities of applying quantum computers to drug design. We discuss where these could transform industrial research and identify the substantial further developments needed to reach this goal.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Challenges for Variational Reduced-Density-Matrix Theory: Total Angular Momentum Constraints.
- Author
-
Li, Run R., Rubin, Nicholas C., and DePrince III, A. Eugene
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Compressing Many-Body Fermion Operators under Unitary Constraints.
- Author
-
Rubin, Nicholas C., Lee, Joonho, and Babbush, Ryan
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Challenges for Variational Reduced-Density-Matrix Theory: Total Angular Momentum Constraints
- Author
-
Li, Run R., Rubin, Nicholas C., and DePrince, A. Eugene
- Abstract
The variational two-electron reduced density matrix (v2RDM) method is generalized for the description of total angular momentum (J) and projection of total angular momentum (MJ) states in atomic systems described by nonrelativistic Hamiltonians, and it is shown that the approach exhibits serious deficiencies. Under ensemble N-representability constraints, v2RDM theory fails to retain the appropriate degeneracies among various Jstates for fixed spin (S) and orbital angular momentum (L), and for fixed L, S, and J, the manifold of MJstates is not necessarily degenerate. Moreover, a substantial energy error is observed for a system for which the two-electron reduced density matrix is exactly ensemble N-representable; in this case, the error stems from violations in pure-state N-representability conditions. Unfortunately, such violations do not appear to be good indicators of the reliability of energies from v2RDM theory in general. Several states are identified for which energy errors are near zero and yet pure-state conditions are clearly violated.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Unbiasing fermionic quantum Monte Carlo with a quantum computer
- Author
-
Huggins, William J., O’Gorman, Bryan A., Rubin, Nicholas C., Reichman, David R., Babbush, Ryan, and Lee, Joonho
- Abstract
Interacting many-electron problems pose some of the greatest computational challenges in science, with essential applications across many fields. The solutions to these problems will offer accurate predictions of chemical reactivity and kinetics, and other properties of quantum systems1–4. Fermionic quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods5,6, which use a statistical sampling of the ground state, are among the most powerful approaches to these problems. Controlling the fermionic sign problem with constraints ensures the efficiency of QMC at the expense of potentially significant biases owing to the limited flexibility of classical computation. Here we propose an approach that combines constrained QMC with quantum computation to reduce such biases. We implement our scheme experimentally using up to 16 qubits to unbias constrained QMC calculations performed on chemical systems with as many as 120 orbitals. These experiments represent the largest chemistry simulations performed with the help of quantum computers, while achieving accuracy that is competitive with state-of-the-art classical methods without burdensome error mitigation. Compared with the popular variational quantum eigensolver7,8, our hybrid quantum-classical computational model offers an alternative path towards achieving a practical quantum advantage for the electronic structure problem without demanding exceedingly accurate preparation and measurement of the ground-state wavefunction.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Compressing Many-Body Fermion Operators under Unitary Constraints
- Author
-
Rubin, Nicholas C., Lee, Joonho, and Babbush, Ryan
- Abstract
The most efficient known quantum circuits for preparing unitary coupled cluster states and applying Trotter steps of the arbitrary basis electronic structure Hamiltonian involve interleaved sequences of Fermionic Gaussian circuits and Ising interaction-type circuits. These circuits arise from factorizing the two-body operators generating those unitaries as a sum of squared one-body operators that are simulated using product formulas. We introduce a numerical algorithm for performing this factorization that has an iteration complexity no worse than single particle basis transformations of the two-body operators and often results in many times fewer squared one-body operators in the sum of squares, compared to the analytical decompositions. As an application of this numerical procedure, we demonstrate that our protocol can be used to approximate generic unitary coupled cluster operators and prepare the necessary high-quality initial states for techniques (like ADAPT-VQE) that iteratively construct approximations to the ground state.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Time-crystalline eigenstate order on a quantum processor
- Author
-
Mi, Xiao, Ippoliti, Matteo, Quintana, Chris, Greene, Ami, Chen, Zijun, Gross, Jonathan, Arute, Frank, Arya, Kunal, Atalaya, Juan, Babbush, Ryan, Bardin, Joseph C., Basso, Joao, Bengtsson, Andreas, Bilmes, Alexander, Bourassa, Alexandre, Brill, Leon, Broughton, Michael, Buckley, Bob B., Buell, David A., Burkett, Brian, Bushnell, Nicholas, Chiaro, Benjamin, Collins, Roberto, Courtney, William, Debroy, Dripto, Demura, Sean, Derk, Alan R., Dunsworth, Andrew, Eppens, Daniel, Erickson, Catherine, Farhi, Edward, Fowler, Austin G., Foxen, Brooks, Gidney, Craig, Giustina, Marissa, Harrigan, Matthew P., Harrington, Sean D., Hilton, Jeremy, Ho, Alan, Hong, Sabrina, Huang, Trent, Huff, Ashley, Huggins, William J., Ioffe, L. B., Isakov, Sergei V., Iveland, Justin, Jeffrey, Evan, Jiang, Zhang, Jones, Cody, Kafri, Dvir, Khattar, Tanuj, Kim, Seon, Kitaev, Alexei, Klimov, Paul V., Korotkov, Alexander N., Kostritsa, Fedor, Landhuis, David, Laptev, Pavel, Lee, Joonho, Lee, Kenny, Locharla, Aditya, Lucero, Erik, Martin, Orion, McClean, Jarrod R., McCourt, Trevor, McEwen, Matt, Miao, Kevin C., Mohseni, Masoud, Montazeri, Shirin, Mruczkiewicz, Wojciech, Naaman, Ofer, Neeley, Matthew, Neill, Charles, Newman, Michael, Niu, Murphy Yuezhen, O’Brien, Thomas E., Opremcak, Alex, Ostby, Eric, Pato, Balint, Petukhov, Andre, Rubin, Nicholas C., Sank, Daniel, Satzinger, Kevin J., Shvarts, Vladimir, Su, Yuan, Strain, Doug, Szalay, Marco, Trevithick, Matthew D., Villalonga, Benjamin, White, Theodore, Yao, Z. Jamie, Yeh, Ping, Yoo, Juhwan, Zalcman, Adam, Neven, Hartmut, Boixo, Sergio, Smelyanskiy, Vadim, Megrant, Anthony, Kelly, Julian, Chen, Yu, Sondhi, S. L., Moessner, Roderich, Kechedzhi, Kostyantyn, Khemani, Vedika, and Roushan, Pedram
- Abstract
Quantum many-body systems display rich phase structure in their low-temperature equilibrium states1. However, much of nature is not in thermal equilibrium. Remarkably, it was recently predicted that out-of-equilibrium systems can exhibit novel dynamical phases2–8that may otherwise be forbidden by equilibrium thermodynamics, a paradigmatic example being the discrete time crystal (DTC)7,9–15. Concretely, dynamical phases can be defined in periodically driven many-body-localized (MBL) systems via the concept of eigenstate order7,16,17. In eigenstate-ordered MBL phases, the entire many-body spectrum exhibits quantum correlations and long-range order, with characteristic signatures in late-time dynamics from all initial states. It is, however, challenging to experimentally distinguish such stable phases from transient phenomena, or from regimes in which the dynamics of a few select states can mask typical behaviour. Here we implement tunable controlled-phase (CPHASE) gates on an array of superconducting qubits to experimentally observe an MBL-DTC and demonstrate its characteristic spatiotemporal response for generic initial states7,9,10. Our work employs a time-reversal protocol to quantify the impact of external decoherence, and leverages quantum typicality to circumvent the exponential cost of densely sampling the eigenspectrum. Furthermore, we locate the phase transition out of the DTC with an experimental finite-size analysis. These results establish a scalable approach to studying non-equilibrium phases of matter on quantum processors.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Quantum approximate optimization of non-planar graph problems on a planar superconducting processor
- Author
-
Harrigan, Matthew P., Sung, Kevin J., Neeley, Matthew, Satzinger, Kevin J., Arute, Frank, Arya, Kunal, Atalaya, Juan, Bardin, Joseph C., Barends, Rami, Boixo, Sergio, Broughton, Michael, Buckley, Bob B., Buell, David A., Burkett, Brian, Bushnell, Nicholas, Chen, Yu, Chen, Zijun, Chiaro, Ben, Collins, Roberto, Courtney, William, Demura, Sean, Dunsworth, Andrew, Eppens, Daniel, Fowler, Austin, Foxen, Brooks, Gidney, Craig, Giustina, Marissa, Graff, Rob, Habegger, Steve, Ho, Alan, Hong, Sabrina, Huang, Trent, Ioffe, L. B., Isakov, Sergei V., Jeffrey, Evan, Jiang, Zhang, Jones, Cody, Kafri, Dvir, Kechedzhi, Kostyantyn, Kelly, Julian, Kim, Seon, Klimov, Paul V., Korotkov, Alexander N., Kostritsa, Fedor, Landhuis, David, Laptev, Pavel, Lindmark, Mike, Leib, Martin, Martin, Orion, Martinis, John M., McClean, Jarrod R., McEwen, Matt, Megrant, Anthony, Mi, Xiao, Mohseni, Masoud, Mruczkiewicz, Wojciech, Mutus, Josh, Naaman, Ofer, Neill, Charles, Neukart, Florian, Niu, Murphy Yuezhen, O’Brien, Thomas E., O’Gorman, Bryan, Ostby, Eric, Petukhov, Andre, Putterman, Harald, Quintana, Chris, Roushan, Pedram, Rubin, Nicholas C., Sank, Daniel, Skolik, Andrea, Smelyanskiy, Vadim, Strain, Doug, Streif, Michael, Szalay, Marco, Vainsencher, Amit, White, Theodore, Yao, Z. Jamie, Yeh, Ping, Zalcman, Adam, Zhou, Leo, Neven, Hartmut, Bacon, Dave, Lucero, Erik, Farhi, Edward, and Babbush, Ryan
- Abstract
Faster algorithms for combinatorial optimization could prove transformative for diverse areas such as logistics, finance and machine learning. Accordingly, the possibility of quantum enhanced optimization has driven much interest in quantum technologies. Here we demonstrate the application of the Google Sycamore superconducting qubit quantum processor to combinatorial optimization problems with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). Like past QAOA experiments, we study performance for problems defined on the planar connectivity graph native to our hardware; however, we also apply the QAOA to the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model and MaxCut, non-native problems that require extensive compilation to implement. For hardware-native problems, which are classically efficient to solve on average, we obtain an approximation ratio that is independent of problem size and observe that performance increases with circuit depth. For problems requiring compilation, performance decreases with problem size. Circuits involving several thousand gates still present an advantage over random guessing but not over some efficient classical algorithms. Our results suggest that it will be challenging to scale near-term implementations of the QAOA for problems on non-native graphs. As these graphs are closer to real-world instances, we suggest more emphasis should be placed on such problems when using the QAOA to benchmark quantum processors.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
- Author
-
Arute, Frank, Arya, Kunal, Babbush, Ryan, Bacon, Dave, Bardin, Joseph C., Barends, Rami, Biswas, Rupak, Boixo, Sergio, Brandao, Fernando G. S. L., Buell, David A., Burkett, Brian, Chen, Yu, Chen, Zijun, Chiaro, Ben, Collins, Roberto, Courtney, William, Dunsworth, Andrew, Farhi, Edward, Foxen, Brooks, Fowler, Austin, Gidney, Craig, Giustina, Marissa, Graff, Rob, Guerin, Keith, Habegger, Steve, Harrigan, Matthew P., Hartmann, Michael J., Ho, Alan, Hoffmann, Markus, Huang, Trent, Humble, Travis S., Isakov, Sergei V., Jeffrey, Evan, Jiang, Zhang, Kafri, Dvir, Kechedzhi, Kostyantyn, Kelly, Julian, Klimov, Paul V., Knysh, Sergey, Korotkov, Alexander, Kostritsa, Fedor, Landhuis, David, Lindmark, Mike, Lucero, Erik, Lyakh, Dmitry, Mandrà, Salvatore, McClean, Jarrod R., McEwen, Matthew, Megrant, Anthony, Mi, Xiao, Michielsen, Kristel, Mohseni, Masoud, Mutus, Josh, Naaman, Ofer, Neeley, Matthew, Neill, Charles, Niu, Murphy Yuezhen, Ostby, Eric, Petukhov, Andre, Platt, John C., Quintana, Chris, Rieffel, Eleanor G., Roushan, Pedram, Rubin, Nicholas C., Sank, Daniel, Satzinger, Kevin J., Smelyanskiy, Vadim, Sung, Kevin J., Trevithick, Matthew D., Vainsencher, Amit, Villalonga, Benjamin, White, Theodore, Yao, Z. Jamie, Yeh, Ping, Zalcman, Adam, Neven, Hartmut, and Martinis, John M.
- Abstract
The promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor1. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here we report the use of a processor with programmable superconducting qubits2–7to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a computational state-space of dimension 253(about 1016). Measurements from repeated experiments sample the resulting probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. Our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times—our benchmarks currently indicate that the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy8–14for this specific computational task, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Tailored and Externally Corrected Coupled Cluster with Quantum Inputs
- Author
-
Scheurer, Maximilian, Anselmetti, Gian-Luca R., Oumarou, Oumarou, Gogolin, Christian, and Rubin, Nicholas C.
- Abstract
We propose to use wave function overlaps obtained from a quantum computer as inputs for the classical split-amplitude techniques, tailored and externally corrected coupled cluster, to achieve balanced treatment of static and dynamic correlation effects in molecular electronic structure simulations. By combining insights from statistical properties of matchgate shadows, which are used to measure quantum trial state overlaps, with classical correlation diagnostics, we can provide quantum resource estimates well into the classically no longer exactly solvable regime. We find that rather imperfect wave functions and remarkably low shot counts are sufficient to cure qualitative failures of plain coupled cluster singles doubles and to obtain chemically precise dynamic correlation energy corrections. We provide insights into which wave function preparation schemes have a chance of yielding quantum advantage, and we test our proposed method using overlaps measured on Google’s Sycamore device.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Strong Electron Correlation in Materials from Pair-Interacting Model Hamiltonians
- Author
-
Rubin, Nicholas C. and Mazziotti, David A.
- Abstract
Strong electron correlation in materials is explored within a class of model Hamiltonians that treat only pair interactions between electrons. The model is unique among typical spin Hamiltonians in that it does not have an effective mean-field reference wave function. The ground-state wave functions from all Hamiltonians in the model have the same one-electron reduced density matrix (1-RDM); consequently, one-electron theories such as the Hartree–Fock and density functional theories are inapplicable. In contrast, the ground-state two-electron reduced density matrix (2-RDM) has a one-to-one mapping to the ground-state wave function. For a range of lattices including linear, ladder, and square topologies, we variationally compute the 2-RDM subject to constraints, known as N-representability conditions, that are necessary for the 2-RDM to represent an N-electron ensemble density matrix. We find that for all model Hamiltonians the 2-RDM is accurately computed as long as the D, Q, and GN-representability conditions are supplemented with the T2condition. Energies, orbital and geminal occupation numbers, and correlation functions are computed. The model has applications to superconductivity as well as more general pairing phenomena in electronic systems. Effective methods are needed to treat strong electron correlation arising in the study of materials including the study of high-temperature superconductivity and phase transitions.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.