Search

Objective Interval cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a well-recognized treatment alternative to primary debulking surgery in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer where patient and/or disease factors prevent complete macroscopic disease resection to be achieved. More recently, the strain of the global COVID-19 pandemic on hospital resources has forced many units to alter the timing of interval surgery and extend the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles. In order to support this paradigm shift and provide more accurate counseling during these unprecedented times, we investigated the survival outcomes in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients with the intent of maximal cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with respect to timing of surgery and degree of cytoreduction. Methods A retrospective review of all patients aged 18 years and above with FIGO (2014) stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the intention of interval cytoreduction surgery between January 2008 and December 2017 was conducted. Overall and progression-free survival outcomes were analyzed and compared with patients who only received chemotherapy. Outcome measures were correlated with the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles and amount of residual disease following surgery. Results Six hundred and seventy-one patients (median age 67 (range 20--91) years) were included in the study with 572 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery and 99 patients with chemotherapy only. There was no difference in the proportion of patients in whom complete cytoreduction was achieved based on number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (2--4 cycles: 67.7%, n=337/498); ≥5 cycles: 62.2%, n=46/74). Patients undergoing cytoreduction surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a median 5-year progression-free and overall survival of 24 and 38 months, respectively. No significant difference in overall survival between surgical groups was observed (interval cytoreduction: 41 months vs delayed cytoreduction: 43 months, p=0.52). Those who achieved complete cytoreduction to R0 (no macroscopic disease) had a significant median overall survival advantage compared with those with any macroscopic residual disease (R0: 49--51 months vs R<1: 22--39 months, p<0.001 vs R≥1: 23--26 months, p<0.001). Conclusions Survival outcomes do not appear to be worse for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy if cytoreduction surgery is delayed beyond three cycles. In advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients the imperative to achieve complete surgical cytoreduction remains gold standard, irrespective of surgical timing, for best survival benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

background The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery improves recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer who are ineligible for primary cytoreductive surgery. The effect of HIPEC remains undetermined in patients who are candidates for primary cytoreductive surgery. Primary objective The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of HIPEC on overall survival in patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who are treated with primary cytoreductive surgery resulting in no residual disease, or residual disease up to 2.5 mm in maximum dimension. study hypothesis We hypothesize that the addition of HIPEC to primary cytoreductive surgery improves overall survival in patients with primary FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. trial design This international, randomized, open-label, phase III trial will enroll 538 patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Following complete or near-complete (residual disease ≤2.5 mm) primary cytoreduction, patients are randomly allocated (1:1) to receive HIPEC or no HIPEC. All patients will receive six courses of platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy, and maintenance PARP-inhibitor or bevacizumab according to current guidelines. Major eligibility criteria Patients with FIGO stage III primary epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer are eligible after complete or nearcomplete primary cytoreductive surgery. Patients with resectable umbilical, spleen, or local bowel lesions may be included. Enlarged extra-abdominal lymph nodes should be negative on FDG-PET or fine-needle aspiration/biopsy. Primary endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival. sample size To detect a HR of 0.67 in favor of HIPEC, 200 overall survival events are required. With an expected accrual period of 60 months and 12 months additional follow-up, 538 patients need to be randomized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The previous (1988) International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) vulval cancer staging system failed in 3 important areas: (1) stage 1 and 2 disease showed similar survival; (2) stage 3 represented a most heterogeneous group of patients with a wide survival range; and (3) the number and morphology of positive nodes were not taken into account.To compare the 1988 FIGO vulval carcinoma staging system with that of 2009 with regard to stage migration and prognostication.Information on all patients treated for vulval cancer at the Queensland Centre for Gynecological Cancers, Australia, between 1988 to the present was obtained. Data included patients’ characteristics as well as details on histopathology, treatments, and follow-up. We recorded the original 1988 FIGO stage, reviewed all patients’ histopathology information, and restaged all patients to the 2009 FIGO staging system. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method to compare relapse-free survival and overall survival.Data from 394 patients with primary vulval carcinoma were eligible for analysis. Patients with stage IA disease remained unchanged. Tumors formerly classified as stage II are now classified as stage IB. Therefore, FIGO 2009 stage II has become rare, with only 6 of 394 patients allocated to stage II. Stage III has been broken down into 3 substages, thus creating distinct differences in relapse-free survival and overall survival. Prognosis of patients with stage IIIC disease is remarkably poor.The FIGO 2009 staging system for vulval carcinoma successfully addresses some concerns of the 1988 system. Especially, it identifies high-risk patients within the heterogeneous group of lymph node-positive patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Concurrent uterine lesions or an irregular endomyometrial junction can make accurate assessment of depth of myometrial invasion (DOI) and percentage of myometrial invasion (%MI) difficult, leading to patients being staged and or treated suboptimally. An alternative measurement, known as the tumor-free distance (TFD), which measures the distance between maximal myometrial invasion and the uterine serosa, has been proposed. Previous studies comparing the predictive abilities of DOI and TFD were underpowered and inconclusive. Our objective was to compare TFD, DOI, and %MI as predictors for lymph node involvement in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients.Patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium treated between January 1997 and December 2007 were included. Tumor-free distance, DOI, and %MI were evaluated along with other pathological variables to determine their predictive ability for nodal involvement. Depth of myometrial invasion was measured between the endomyometrial junction and the maximal myometrial invasion. Tumor-free distance was calculated by subtracting the DOI from myometrial thickness (MT). Percentage MI was derived by dividing DOI by MT and expressed as a percentage of MT invaded. These 3 variables were transformed to z scores, and their ability to predict nodal involvement was compared.A total of 338 patients were eligible for analysis. Mean (SD) MT was 18.7 (5.9) mm. Median DOI was 6 mm, and median TFD was 10.3 mm. On univariate analysis, all 3 variables showed significant associations with nodal involvement. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for lymphovascular space invasion, cervical involvement, serosal/adnexal involvement, grade, %MI, and TFD, DOI retained its statistical significance along with lymphovascular space invasion and cervical involvement.Depth of myometrial invasion predicts nodal involvement independently when compared with TFD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Carboplatin, administered as a single drug or in combination with paclitaxel, is the standard chemotherapy treatment for patients with ovarian cancer (OVCA). Recent evidence suggests that miRNAs associated with small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) participate in the development of chemoresistance. We studied the effect of carboplatin in a heterogeneity population of OVCA cells and their derived sEVs to identify mechanisms associated with chemoresistance. sEVs were quantified using an engineered superparamagnetic material, gold-loaded ferric oxide nanotubes and a screen-printed electrode. miR-21-3p, miR-21-5p, and miR-891-5p are enriched in sEVs, and they contribute to carboplatin resistance in OVCA. Using a quantitative MS/MS, miR-21-5p activates glycolysis and increases the expression of ATP-binding cassette family and a detoxification enzyme. miR-21-3p and miR-891-5p increase the expression of proteins involved in DNA repair mechanisms. Interestingly, the levels of miR-891-5p within sEVs are significantly higher in patients at risk of ovarian cancer relapse. Identification of miRNAs in sEVs also provides the opportunity to track them in biological fluids to potentially determine patient response to chemotherapy. In this study, we have identified the role of 3 miRNAs (miR-21-3p, miR-21-5p, and miR-891-5p) in signaling pathways associated with chemotherapy resistance, in ovarian cancer. miR-891-5p is enriched in circulating exosomes in patients with ovarian cancer recurrence, and might decrease chemosensitivity by transferring the resistant phenotype to recipient cells. Unlabelled Image [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]