1. Discordant results between conventional newborn screening and genomic sequencing in the BabySeq Project
- Author
-
Wojcik, Monica H., Zhang, Tian, Ceyhan-Birsoy, Ozge, Genetti, Casie A., Lebo, Matthew S., Yu, Timothy W., Parad, Richard B., Holm, Ingrid A., Rehm, Heidi L., Beggs, Alan H., Green, Robert C., Agrawal, Pankaj B., Agrawal, Pankaj B., Beggs, Alan H., Betting, Wendi N., Ceyhan-Birsoy, Ozge, Christensen, Kurt D., Dukhovny, Dmitry, Fayer, Shawn, Frankel, Leslie A., Genetti, Casie A., Graham, Chet, Green, Robert C., Guiterrez, Amanda M., Harden, Maegan, Holm, Ingrid A., Krier, Joel B., Lebo, Matthew S., Levy, Harvey L., Lu, Xingquan, Machini, Kalotina, McGuire, Amy L., Murry, Jaclyn B., Naik, Medha, Nguyen, Tiffany T., Parad, Richard B., Peoples, Hayley A., Pereira, Stacey, Petersen, Devan, Ramamurthy, Uma, Ramanathan, Vivek, Rehm, Heidi L., Roberts, Amy, Robinson, Jill O., Roumiantsev, Serguei, Schwartz, Talia S., Truong, Tina K., VanNoy, Grace E., Waisbren, Susan E., and Yu, Timothy W.
- Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) is performed to identify neonates at risk for actionable, severe, early-onset disorders, many of which are genetic. The BabySeq Project randomized neonates to receive conventional NBS or NBS plus exome sequencing (ES) capable of detecting sequence variants that may also diagnose monogenic disease or indicate genetic disease risk. We therefore evaluated how ES and conventional NBS results differ in this population.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF