Search

Pelvic exenteration offers potentially curative treatment for locally advanced and recurrent pelvic tumours. Laterally infiltrating tumours involving the pelvic sidewall have historically been considered unresectable. Highly specialised exenteration units have accumulated experience with en bloc resection of part or all of the iliac vascular system for tumours with major vessel involvement. These approaches involve complex vascular dissection and reconstructive techniques requiring collaboration with the vascular surgery unit. Adding to the complexity is the paucity of evidence on oncovascular techniques in the pelvis given its developing nature. An algorithm for the workup to determine resectability and the vascular reconstruction approach for advanced pelvic tumours involving the aortoiliac axis is suggested based on current literature and personal experience from the authors' unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pelvic exenteration surgery has evolved dramatically in recent decades and now represents the standard of care for many patients with advanced pelvic malignancy. Most recently the use of complex vascular resection and reconstructive techniques have been applied in advanced pelvic oncology surgery at specialist units and these oncovascular techniques are considered one of the frontiers in this field. This article summaries the historical evolution of oncovascular surgery in the pelvis and sets the scene for where this treatment is going. The role of vascular resection and reconstruction in curative treatment of advanced pelvic malignancy is an evolving area that is redefining the boundaries of what was historically thought possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intraoperative assessment of mastectomy flaps and nipple-areola complex (NAC) with indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) for decision-making in delayed breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) remains to be fully elucidated. We evaluated patterns of ischaemia and reperfusion in NSM with delayed breast reconstruction and their outcomes. Single-institution retrospective study of delayed implant-based breast reconstructions following NSM due to poor perfusion analysis on ICGA. Intraoperative ICGA perfusion values and fluorescence patterns during the delayed and subsequent reconstruction operations were analysed. Fifty-six (45 patients) delayed breast reconstructions following NSM were performed. The median time to reconstruction was seven days (range, 4–21 days). A total of 112 fluorescence images were reviewed. Four patterns of ischaemia were identified during initial mastectomy (Type I, diffuse ischaemia; Type II, geographic ischaemia; Type III, incisional ischaemia; Type IV, NAC only ischaemia). All, but 1 breast, had adequate reperfusion during delayed reconstruction. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) was associated with Type I ischaemia (p < 0.001). Mean ICGA absolute and relative perfusion values during initial mastectomy were significantly lower than the perfusion values during delayed reconstruction (absolute value 6.7 versus 40.2 units, p < 0.001; relative value 10% versus 44%, p < 0.001, respectively). There were no cases of partial-thickness or full-thickness necrosis. Delaying breast reconstruction for NSM with ischaemia predicted by ICGA may allow blood supply to the flap and NAC to improve, reducing the risk for necrosis. Distinct patterns of ischaemia and low perfusion values with ICGA may be used in the decision to delay reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis is a major complication of skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) is a novel technology that can identify flaps at risk of necrosis, but there is paucity of cost-effectiveness data particularly in the Australian context. We evaluated its cost-effectiveness in breast reconstruction surgery. Single-institution retrospective study of 295 implant-based breast reconstructions using ICGA compared with 228 reconstructions without ICGA from 2015 to 2020. Costs were calculated using Medicare item numbers and micro-costing analysis. Break-even point analysis determined the number needed to break-even. Cost-utility analysis compared probabilities of ischaemic complications and utility estimates derived from surveys of surgeons to fit into a decision model. There were 295 breast reconstructions using ICGA with a total cost of AU$164,657. The average cost of treating an ischaemic complication was AU$21,375. Use of ICGA reduced the ischaemic complication rate from 14.9% to 8.8%. Ischaemic complications were prevented in 18 breasts resulting in gross cost savings of AU$384,745 and net savings of AU$220,088. Three hundred eighteen cases using ICGA are needed to break-even. The decision model demonstrated a baseline cost difference of AU$1,179, a quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) difference of 1.77, and an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of AU$656 per QALY favouring ICGA. Routine use of ICGA during implant-based breast reconstruction is a cost-effective intervention for the reduction of ischaemic complications in the Australian setting. ICGA use was associated with a gain of 1.77 additional years of perfect health at a cost of AU$656 more per year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]