1. Research-to-Policy Partnerships for Evidence-Informed Resource Allocation in Health Systems in Africa: An Example Using the Thanzi Programme.
- Author
-
Nabyonga-Orem, Juliet, Kataika, Edward, Rollinger, Alexandra, and Weatherly, Helen
- Abstract
Empirical data on the impact of research-to-policy interventions are scant, with the few attempts mainly focusing on ensuring policymakers' timely access to evidence and evidence-informed dialogs. This article reflects on how the Thanzi Programme cultivates an approach of research-to-policy engagement in health economics. The program is structured around 3 interrelated pillars comprising research evidence generation, capacity and capability building, and research-and-policy engagement. Each pillar is described and examples from the Thanzi Programme are given, including illustrating how each pillar informs the other. Limitations and challenges of the approach are discussed, with examples of a way forward. This program supports health system strengthening through addressing gaps identified by program partners. This includes providing health economics training and research and strengthened partnerships between in-country researchers and health policymakers, as well as between national and international researchers. Platforms bringing together researchers and policymakers to shape the research agenda, disseminate evidence, and foster an evidence-based dialog are institutionalized at country and regional levels. Health Economics and Policy Units have been established, which sit between the Ministries of Health and Universities, to augment policymakers and health economics researchers' engagements on priority health policy matters and determine researchable policy questions. The establishment of the Health Economics Community of Practice as a substantive expert committee under the East Central and Southern Africa Health Community bolsters the contribution of health economics evidence in policy processes at the regional level. The Thanzi Programme is an example of how a research-and-policy partnership framework is being used to support evidence-informed health resource allocation decisions in Africa. It uses a combination of high-quality multidisciplinary research, sustained research and policymakers' engagement and capacity strengthening to use research evidence to guide and support policy makers more effectively. • Available research-to-policy frameworks cannot adequately explain the uptake of evidence in low-income countries. Empirical data on the impact of research-to-policy interventions in Africa are scant, with the few attempts mainly focusing on ensuring policymakers' timely access to evidence and evidence-informed dialogs. Suboptimal skills in evaluation and interpretation of results, lack of methodological rigor, poor linkages between evidence and budget processes, use of jargon, and poor dissemination impede the uptake of evidence from economic evaluations. • Evidence-informed resource allocation decisions can be improved through a combination of high-quality research, research-to-policy engagement, and capability and capacity strengthening. These 3 interrelated pillars of activity work together to support research-to-policy partnerships, namely, robust and locally relevant research evidence generation, strengthened institutional capacity and individual capability to generate and use evidence, and engagement between researchers and policymakers to share evidence and engender common learning. • Impactful research-to-policy interactions require multiple approaches and partnership working that build the required skills, institutionalize researcher policy engagements, and ensure rigor in generation of locally relevant multidisciplinary evidence that is linked to planning and resource allocation frameworks. A broader perception of partnerships is beneficial to leverage expertise in evidence generation and galvanize action at national, subregional, and regional levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF