Search

Pancreatic fistula is a potentially morbid complication after distal pancreatectomy. Chronic glucocorticoid use is one of the risk factors for pancreatic fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy, though it has not been reported in distal pancreatectomy. We explored whether chronic glucocorticoid use can be a risk factor for pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy. We reviewed 408 consecutive patients who underwent elective distal pancreatectomy from 2011 to 2021. We evaluated two kinds of pancreatic fistula (postoperative pancreatic fistula and delayed pancreatic fistula). We defined delayed pancreatic fistula as a patient who was re-admitted for pancreatic fistula after the first discharge from the hospital. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Two hundred sixty-seven patients underwent open distal pancreatectomy, while 141 patients had laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. A comparison of patient with and without chronic glucocorticoid use showed that only patients with chronic glucocorticoid use developed delayed pancreatic fistula (0% vs. 16.7%; p < 0.001). In addition, delayed pancreatic fistula occurred in only laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy patients with chronic glucocorticoid use (0% vs. 25.0%; p < 0.001). Although sample size is small, it is reasonable to presume that chronic glucocorticoid use is a potential risk factor for delayed pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of intravenous (i.v.) and intraperitoneal (i.p.) paclitaxel combined with S-l, "an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative containing tegafur, gimestat, and otastat potassium'' in chemotherapy-naive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with peritoneal metastasis. Background: PDAC patients with peritoneal metastasis (peritoneal deposits and/or positive peritoneal cytology) have an extremely poor prognosis. An effective treatment strategy remains elusive. Methods: Paclitaxel was administered i.v. at 50mg/m² and i.p. at 20mg/m² on days 1 and 8. S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m²/d for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7 days of rest. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. The secondary endpoints were antitumor effect and safety (UMIN000009446). Results: Thirty-three patients who were pathologically diagnosed with the presence of peritoneal dissemination (n = 22) and/or positive peritoneal cytology (n = 11) without other organ metastasis were enrolled. The tumor was located at the pancreatic head in 7 patients and the body/tail in 26 patients. The median survival time was 16.3 (11.47-22.57) months, and the 1-year survival rate was 62%. The response rate and disease control rate in assessable patients were 36% and 82%, respectively. OS in 8 patients who underwent conversion surgery was significantly higher than that of nonsurgical patients (n = 25, P = 0.0062). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities occurred in 42% of the patients and nonhematologic adverse events in 18%. One patient died of thrombosis in the superior mesenteric artery. Conclusions: This regimen has shown promising clinical efficacy with acceptable tolerability in chemotherapy-naive PDAC patients with peritoneal metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]