Search

Background and purpose Tirofiban administration after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunct tirofiban treatment following MT for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) that resulted in successful reperfusion on digital subtraction angiography (DSA).Methods This retrospective study was conducted in Zhengzhou University University People's Hospital, an advanced stroke center in China. Consecutive patients with AIS who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) were enrolled from June 2018 to January 2022. The safety endpoints were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), total intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 3-month mortality. The efficacy endpoints were 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score and 24-h neurological improvement.Results A total of 145 consecutive patients with AIS who underwent MT were analyzed, of whom 51 (35.2%) patients were in the tirofiban group. There were 30 (20.7%) patients with sICH, 50 (34.5%) patients suffered from ICH within 24-h post-MT, and 47 (32.4%) dead at 3-month. Besides, 31 (21.4%) patients achieved excellent clinical outcomes (mRS, 0-1), and 24-h neurological improvement was found in 29 (20.0%) patients. No statistically significant differences were found in safety outcomes on sICH, total ICH, and 3-month mortality, as well as efficacy outcomes on 3-month mRS scores (0-1) and 24-h neurological improvement between the two groups (P> 0.05 for all). Additionally, tirofiban was associated with 3-month mRS scores of 0-2 (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41–10.02, P= 0.008).Conclusion Adjunct tirofiban treatment following MT for AIS patients with LVO that resulted in successful reperfusion on DSA was not correlated with the increased risk of safety endpoints on sICH, ICH, and 3-month mortality, and it may be associated with a lower 3-month mRS score.

Objective To investigate the safety and long-term effect of using the Wingspan stent for severe symptomatic atherosclerotic basilar artery stenosis (≥70%).Materials and methods Between July 2007 and April 2013, we had 91 consecutive patients (age range 41–82 years old) with symptomatic severe basilar stenosis (70–99%) who underwent Wingspan stenting at our center. All patients had stenosis-related temporary ischemic attack or strokes. We analyzed the demographic data, pre- and post-procedural cerebral angiography, technical success rate, peri-procedural complications, and clinical and imaging follow-ups.Results The Wingspan stenting procedure was successful in all patients: The stenosis was reduced from 82.2% ± 5.8% pre-stenting to 15.9% ± 5.7% post-stenting. The 30-day peri-operative rate for stroke or death was 14.3%, which included ischemic stroke in 12 cases (12/91 = 13.2%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage in one case (1/91 = 1.1%), with a fatal or disabling stroke rate of 2.2%. Among the 77 patients with clinical follow-up assessment within 7–60 months (mean 31.3 ± 15.1 months) after stenting, four patients (5.2%) had posterior ischemia, including one patient with disabling ischemic stroke (1.3%) and three patients (3.9%) with temporary ischemic attack. The 2-year cumulative stroke rate was 16% (95% CI: 8.2–23.8%). Among 46 patients with imaging assessments at 3–45 months (mean, 9.5 ± 8.3) post-stenting, six (13.0%) patients had restenosis, including two (2/46 = 4.3%) with symptomatic restenosis.Conclusions The benefit of stenting for patients with severe basilar artery stenosis (> 70%) may lie in lowering the long-term fatal and disabling stroke rate; and as long as the peri-operative stroke rate can be kept at a relatively lower level, patients with severe basilar stenosis can benefit from basilar artery stenting.