Search

Introduction: Migraine is under-diagnosed and under-treated. Many people with migraine do not seek medical care, and those who do may initially receive a different diagnosis and/or be dissatisfied with provided care on their journey before treatment with a CGRP-mAb (calcitonin-gene-related-peptide monoclonal antibody). Methods: This is a cross-sectional, self-reported, online survey of subjects in Lilly’s Emgality®Patient Support Program in 2022. Questionnaires collected insights into subjects’ prior experiences with migraine and interactions with healthcare professionals before receiving CGRP-mAbs. Results: Of the 250 participants with episodic and 250 with chronic migraine, 90% were female and white with a mean age of 26.2 years (± 11.9) at diagnosis and 40.6 (± 12.0) years at survey enrollment. Many participants (71%) suspected they had migraine before diagnosis, with 31% reluctant to seek help. Of these, approximately one-third were unaware of treatment, did not think that a physician could do anything more for migraine, would not take them seriously, or were reluctant due to a previous unhelpful experience. Participants mainly received information from friends/family (47%) or the internet (28%). Participants initially sought treatment due to an increase in migraine frequency (77%), attacks interfering with work or school (75%), or increased pain intensity (74%). Subjects saw a mean of 4.1 (± 4.3) healthcare providers before migraine diagnosis, and 20% of participants previously received a different diagnosis. Participants reported migraine causes included stress/anxiety/depression (42%), hormonal changes (30%), nutrition (20%), and weather (16%). Acute treatment of migraine included prescription (82%) and over-the-counter (50%) medications, changes in nutrition (62%), adjusting fluid intake (56%), and relaxation techniques (55%). Preventive medications included anticonvulsants (61%), antidepressants (44%), blood pressure-lowering medications (43%), and botulinum toxin A injections (17%). Most discontinuations were due to lack of efficacy or side effects. Conclusion: People with migraine describe reluctance in seeking health care, and misunderstandings seem common especially in the beginning of their migraine journey. Graphical Abstract:

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

AbstractAims:Health utilities summarize a patient’s overall health status. This study estimated utilities based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30), a widely used measure of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in oncology, using published mapping algorithms.Materials and methods:Data were from the Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) in Lung Cancer Trial of brigatinib (ALTA; NCT02094573), an open-label, international, phase 2 study. ALTA evaluated the efficacy and safety of two randomized dosing regimens of brigatinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK + non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that had progressed on prior therapy with crizotinib. QLQ-C30 scores were mapped to European Quality-of-Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) utility scores using two published algorithms (Khan et al. for EQ-5D-5L; Longworth et al. for EQ-5D-3L). The impact of brigatinib treatment on health utilities over time was assessed.Results:The analysis included 208 subjects. Mean baseline utility scores for both algorithms ranged between 0.60 − 0.71 and increased to 0.78 by cycle 5. Utility improvements were sustained during most of the treatment, before disease progression. Minor variations were observed between utility scores; Khan et al. estimates were approximately 0.01 or 0.02 points lower than Longworth et al. estimates.Limitations:Algorithms considered were limited to those available in the published literature at the time of the study. This utility analysis was exploratory, and the ALTA trial did not include an internal control group (i.e. standard of care) and was not powered to detect differences in QoL/utility outcomes between treatment arms.Conclusions:Converting QLQ-C30 scores into utilities in trials using established mapping algorithms can improve evaluation of medicines from the patient perspective. Both algorithms suggested that brigatinib improved health utility in crizotinib-refractory ALK + NSCLC patients, and improvements were maintained during most of the treatment.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT02094573

Alpha (α)- and beta (β)-thalassemia are inherited red blood cell disorders with a wide spectrum of symptoms, functional manifestations, and disease burden. The standard of care for α- and -β-thalassemia major is regular transfusions and iron chelation therapy. However, symptoms may persist despite treatment. Patients with non-transfusion dependent (NTD) thalassemia are historically considered to have less severe disease than patients who are transfusion-dependent (TD), yet they may experience considerable disease burden negatively affecting their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Additionally, little is known about the HRQoL of α- thalassemia patients, of whom a majority are NTD.

Background: Electronic administration of clinician-reported outcomes (eClinROs) has advantages over paper-based methods, but the mode of administration change has the potential to affect the validity of the scale. The literature on migration of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) suggests that there are different levels of modification, which necessitate different approaches to demonstrating mode equivalence. However, little has been written on the migration of ClinROs to electronic administration. Methods: We propose a method of comparing paper and electronic versions of scales that includes a comparison based on content and a comparison based on format. The determination of whether the eClinRO has undergone minor, moderate, or substantial modification will drive the necessary studies required for validation. Results: The unique characteristics of ClinROs suggest 2 additional types of modifications, including functionality adaptation and adaptation of instructions. Conclusions: In many respects, the migration of a ClinRO to electronic administration is similar to that of a PRO. This article has explored the ways in which there might be special considerations for ClinROs that have not been elaborated for PROs.

Background: Electronic administration of clinician-reported outcomes (eClinROs) has advantages over paper-based methods, but the mode of administration change has the potential to affect the validity of the scale. The literature on migration of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) suggests that there are different levels of modification, which necessitate different approaches to demonstrating mode equivalence. However, little has been written on the migration of ClinROs to electronic administration.Methods: We propose a method of comparing paper and electronic versions of scales that includes a comparison based on content and a comparison based on format. The determination of whether the eClinRO has undergone minor, moderate, or substantial modification will drive the necessary studies required for validation.Results: The unique characteristics of ClinROs suggest 2 additional types of modifications, including functionality adaptation and adaptation of instructions.Conclusions: In many respects, the migration of a ClinRO to electronic administration is similar to that of a PRO. This article has explored the ways in which there might be special considerations for ClinROs that have not been elaborated for PROs.

The goal of comparative effectiveness research (CER) is to explain the differential benefits and harms of alternate methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition or to improve the delivery of care. To inform decision making, information from the patient’s perspective that reflects outcomes that patients care about are needed and can be collected rigorously using appropriate patient-reported outcomes (PRO). It can be challenging to select the most appropriate PRO measure given the proliferation of such questionnaires over the past 20 years.

Cella: Novartis:Consultancy;Kiniksa:Consultancy;IDDI:Consultancy;BMS:Consultancy, Research Funding;Oncoquest:Consultancy;ASAHI KASEI PHARMA CORP.:Consultancy;Mei Pharma:Consultancy;Ipsen:Consultancy, Research Funding;Evidera:Consultancy;DSI:Consultancy, Research Funding;BlueNote:Consultancy;Abbvie:Consultancy, Research Funding;Astellas:Consultancy, Honoraria;FACIT.org:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: President;PROMIS Health Org:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other;Pled Pharma:Research Funding;Janssen:Research Funding;Clovis:Research Funding;Alexion:Research Funding;Apellis:Consultancy;Pfizer:Consultancy, Research Funding.Lenderking:Evidera:Current Employment.Sarda:Apellis:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Baver:Apellis:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Hamdani:Apellis Pharmaceuticals:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Hsieh:Evidera/PPD:Current Employment.Shaffer:Evidera:Current Employment.Röth:Sanofi:Consultancy, Honoraria;Roche:Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria;Biocryst:Consultancy, Honoraria;Apellis:Consultancy, Honoraria;Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.:Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.Pegcetacoplan is an investigational drug for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

BACKGROUND

Abstract:Study Objective:Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a persistent and potentially disabling movement disorder associated with prolonged antipsychotic use. RE KINECT, a real-world screening study of antipsychotic-treated outpatients, included patients with movements that were clinician-confirmed as possible TD (Cohort 2) and patients with no involuntary movements (Cohort 1). Baseline data from the patient rated EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) were analyzed to evaluate health related quality of life (Cohort 2 vs. Cohort 1) and the effects of possible TD on quality of life (Cohort 2).Methods:Assessments included EQ-5D-5L utility score (0=equivalent to death to 1=perfect health); SDS total score (0=no impact to 30=highest impact); patient- and clinician-rated severity of possible TD in 4 body regions (0=none, 1=some, and 2=a lot; summary score, 0 to 8); and patient-rated impact of possible TD in 7 daily activities (0=none, 1=some, and 2=a lot; summary score, 0 to 14). Populations included Cohort 1 (N=450); full Cohort 2 (N=204); and limited Cohort 2 (N=111, patients who self-reported “some” or “a lot” of TD severity in ≥1 body region). Mean differences between Cohort 2 and Cohort 1 in EQ-5D-5L utility and SDS total scores were analyzed using a generalized linear regression model that was adjusted for potentially confounding factors (e.g., age, sex, psychiatric diagnosis). Associations between TD summary scores (severity, impact) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L utility, SDS total) were analyzed using a regression model.Results:The mean score difference between full Cohort 2 (N=204) and Cohort 1 (N=450) was significant for EQ-5D-5L utility (-0.037; P<0.05 [adjusted analysis]) but not SDS total (0.267; P>0.05). However, when limited to Cohort 2 patients who self-reported “a lot” of TD severity (n=53) or impact (n=33), both EQ 5D 5L utility and SDS total scores were significantly worse than in Cohort 1 (P<0.05). Regression coefficients indicated significant associations between patient-rated impact and EQ 5D-5L utility in the full Cohort 2 (-0.021, P<0.001) and limited Cohort 2 (-0.024, P<0.001). A significant association was also found with patient rated severity in limited Cohort 2 (P<0.05), but not with clinician-rated severity. Similar results were found for SDS total score.Conclusions:RE-KINECT patients were consistent in evaluating the severity and impact of TD, whether based on subjective assessments or standardized patient-reported instruments (EQ-5D-5L, SDS). Clinician-rated severity of TD may not always correlate with patient perceptions of the significance of TD. Patient self-assessments (focused on symptom impact) can be clinically relevant; incorporating such measures into everyday practice may provide a more comprehensive approach to TD assessment and management.Funding Acknowledgements:Supported by Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Reliable and valid assessment instruments in aesthetic surgery are a vital factor in assessing patient satisfaction with physical appearance. Appearance and satisfaction assessments are needed to adequately evaluate quality of life related to changes in the female breast across a variety of surgical interventions. The Breast Evaluation Questionnaire was designed to assess satisfaction with breast attributes.

AbstractObjectiveTardive dyskinesia (TD) is a hyperkinetic movement disorder associated with antipsychotic treatment. RE KINECT (NCT03062033), a real-world study of outpatients prescribed antipsychotics, was designed to identify the presence of possible TD and characterize the impact of involuntary movements on functioning and quality of life. Data from RE-KINECT were used to compare the impact of possible TD in patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder [SZD] versus mood/other psychiatric disorders [Mood].MethodsAdults with ≥3months of lifetime exposure to antipsychotics and ≥1 psychiatric disorder were recruited. The presence of possible TD was based on clinicians’ observation of involuntary movements in 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). Baseline outcomes included demographics, medication history, location/severity of abnormal movements, impact of abnormal movements on daily activities, the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the EuroQoL 5-Dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).ResultsOf 204 patients with clinician-confirmed possible TD, 111 (54.4%) had a SZD diagnosis and 93 (45.6%) had a mood/other psychiatric diagnosis. Significant differences found between groups (Mood vs SZD) included: mean age (56.9 vs 52.7 years; P=0.0263); male sex (33.3% vs 62.2%; P<0.0001); African-American race (7.5% vs 26.1%; P=0.0005); mean lifetime exposure to antipsychotics (9.5 vs 19.5 years; P<0.0001); and percentage of patients currently taking ≥2 psychiatric medications (93.5% vs 79.3%; P=0.0093). Based on clinician observation, there were no significant differences between diagnosis groups in the number of body regions impacted by abnormal movements, maximum severity score across all 4 regions, or patient awareness of possible TD. Over 30% of patients in both groups reported that involuntary movements had “some” or “a lot” of impact on their ability to continue usual activities, be productive, and socialize. No significant differences between the diagnosis groups (Mood vs SZD) were found for mean SDS total score (12.8 vs 10.8), SDS domain scores (work/school [4.1 vs 4.2], social life [4.3 vs 3.7], family life [4.1 vs 3.5]), EQ-5D-5L utility score (0.68 vs 0.74), or EQ-5D-5L health state VAS (64.8 vs 68.5).ConclusionsIn this cohort of outpatients with possible TD, those with Mood disorders were more likely to be older, female, and white than patients with SZD. The ability to function and quality of life were equally impaired in both groups. Further studies on the impact of TD are needed.Funding Acknowledgements: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.