Search

Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture (rAAA) is still associated with high mortality. Recent studies have shown higher incidences in autumn and winter, and worse outcomes after rAAA treatment on weekends in some countries. This study aimed to analyse seasonal, weekday, and daytime fluctuations of the hospital incidence, treatment modalities, and outcomes of rAAA, based on the most recent nationwide German real world data. A secondary data analysis of diagnosis related group statistics (2009 – 2018), obtained from the German Federal Statistical Office, was conducted. Cases encoded by a diagnosis of rAAA in conjunction with procedural codes for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or open aortic repair were included. Patient and procedural characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes were analysed for seasonal (spring, summer, autumn, and winter), weekday (Monday – Sunday) and daytime (0:00 – 8:00, 8:00 –16:00, 16:00 –20:00, and 20:00 – 24:00) fluctuations by descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analyses. Thirteen thousand and seventy patients (85% male, median age 75 years) were treated for rAAA. Endovascular aortic repair was associated with lower mortality (adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.37 – 0.44). While no significant seasonal fluctuations were found, on a weekday basis lower hospital incidences were found on Mondays (12%) and Sundays (11%) compared with other weekdays (15 – 16%). Similarly, EVAR rates were lower on Mondays and Sundays (25% and 24%, respectively) compared with other weekdays (30 – 33%). Multivariable analyses revealed higher mortality rates on Mondays and Sundays. On a daytime basis, lower EVAR rates and higher mortality rates were found during the 16:00 – 8:00 period. In German hospitals, incidences and EVAR rates to treat rAAA were lowest on Mondays and Sundays. The associated overall mortality rates were highest on the respective days. Further restructuring and centralisation of AAA treatment in Germany could potentially mitigate this weekday effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The external validity of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and their transferability to clinical practice is under investigated. This study aimed to analyse the exclusion criteria of recent carotid RCTs comparing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting, and to assess the eligibility of consecutive clinical practice cohorts to those RCTs. An analysis of the clinical and anatomical exclusion criteria of RCTs for asymptomatic (SPACE-2, ACST-2, CREST-1, and CREST-2) and symptomatic carotid stenosis (SPACE-1, CREST-1, ICSS, and EVA-3S) was performed. Two hundred consecutive asymptomatic and 200 consecutive symptomatic patients, treated by CEA, or transfemoral or transcarotid artery stenting at a tertiary referral university centre were assessed for their potential eligibility for each corresponding RCT. RCT patient data were pooled and differences from the clinical practice cohort analysed. Statistics were descriptive and comparative using Fisher's exact and t tests. The number of clinical and anatomical exclusion criteria differed widely between RCTs. Potential eligibility rates of the clinical practice cohort for RCTs with regard to asymptomatic carotid stenosis were 80.5% (ACST-2), 79.5% (SPACE-2), 47% (CREST-1), and 20% (CREST-2). For RCTs on symptomatic carotid stenosis the eligibility rates were 89% (ICSS), 86.5% (EVA-3S), 64% (SPACE-1), and 39% (CREST-1). Both clinical practice cohorts were older by about three years and patients were more often male vs. the RCTs. Furthermore, a history of smoking (asymptomatic patients), hypertension (symptomatic patients), and atrial fibrillation was diagnosed more often, whereas hypercholesterolaemia and coronary heart disease (asymptomatic patients) were less prevalent. More clinical practice patients were on antiplatelets, anticoagulants, and lipid lowering drugs. Symptomatic clinical practice patients presented more often with retinal ischaemia and less often with minor hemispheric strokes than patients in the RCTs. The external validity of contemporary carotid RCTs varies considerably. Patients in routine clinical practice differ from RCT populations with respect to age, comorbidities, and medication. These data are of interest for clinicians and guideline authors and may be relevant for the design of future comparative trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a description of the German healthcare landscape regarding carotid artery disease, assessment of hospital incidence time courses for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), and simulation of potential effects of minimum hospital caseload requirements for CEA and CAS. The study is a secondary data analysis of diagnosis related group statistics data (2005–2016), provided by the German Federal Statistical Office. Cases encoded by German operation procedure codes for CEA or CAS and by International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes for carotid artery disease were included. Hospitals were categorised into quartiles according to annual caseloads. Linear distances to the closest hospital fulfilling hypothetical caseload requirements were calculated. A total of 132 411 and 33 709 patients treated with CEA and CAS from 2012 to 2016 were included. CEA patients had lower rates of myocardial infarction (1.4% vs. 1.8%) and death (1.2% vs. 4.0%), and CAS patients were more often treated after emergency admission (38.1% vs. 27.1%). Age standardised annual hospital incidences were 67.2 per 100 000 inhabitants for CEA and 16.3 per 100 000 inhabitants for CAS. The incidence for CEA declined from 2005 to 2016, with CAS rising again until 2016 after having declined from 2010 to 2013. Regarding distance from home to hospital, centres offering CEA are distributed more homogeneously across Germany, compared with those performing CAS. Hypothetical introduction of minimum annual caseloads (> 20 for CEA; > 10 for CAS) imply that 75% of the population would reach their hospital after travelling 45 km for CEA and 70 km for CAS. Differences in spatial distribution mean that statutory minimum annual caseloads would have a greater impact on CAS accessibility than CEA in Germany. Presumably because of a decline in carotid artery disease and a transition towards individualised therapy for asymptomatic patients, hospital incidence for CEA has been declining. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The application of intra-operative completion studies may have contributed to the ongoing improvement of peri-operative outcomes in carotid surgery. This prospective study aimed to compare angiography and duplex ultrasound (IDUS) as intra-operative completion studies after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with respect to differences in the rating of vessel wall defects and interobserver reliability. Patients undergoing CEA for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis were included. After CEA, angiography and IDUS were performed. Intra-operatively obtained video footage was evaluated at a later date by three independent and blinded raters with different levels of clinical experience. Rating was done according to a four step rating scale, with higher grades representing more severe defects. Standard statistical methods (Pearson's chi square test; permutation test; Wilcoxon signed rank test; Kendall's coefficient of concordance, Wt) were applied. In total, 150 patients (mean ± standard deviation age 72 ± 7 years, 68.7% male, 33.3% symptomatic) were enrolled between March 2016 and September 2017. Significantly more defects requiring intra-operative revision (grades 3 and 4 on rating scale) were detected by IDUS, which, in part, remained undetected by angiography: 22 (14.7%) vs. 10 (6.7%) (p =.040). Defects were also judged to be more severe with IDUS than with angiography: median rating grade 1: 74 (49.3%) vs. 102 (68.0%); grade 2: 54 (36.0%) vs. 38 (25.3%); grade 3: 21 (14.0%) vs. 9 (6.0%); grade 4: 1 (0.7%) vs. 1 (0.7%) (p <.001). Furthermore, Wt was significantly higher for IDUS compared with angiography (0.70 vs. 0.57; p =.003). IDUS revealed more defects after CEA than angiography. Despite both techniques only showing moderate interobserver reliability, IDUS is less dependent on the surgeon's subjectivity than angiography. Taking into account the absence of procedure associated risks (i.e., adverse effects of iodinated contrast media and Xray), IDUS could be considered as an alternative intra-operative morphological assessment tool in carotid surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We sought to analyze the association between last neurologic event and the risk of stroke or death among patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) under routine conditions in Germany. Secondary data analysis was performed based on the German statutory quality assurance database for carotid procedures. A total of 144,347 patients treated by CEA and 14,794 patients treated by CAS were included in the analysis. Primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death. To analyze the association between the last neurologic event and outcome, multilevel multivariable regression analysis was performed. In patients treated by CEA, raw risk for any in-hospital stroke or death was 2.0% (2923/144,347), with a risk of 1.4% in asymptomatic and 3.0% in symptomatic patients. In patients treated by CAS, raw risk for any in-hospital stroke or death was 3.6% (538/14,794), with a risk of 1.7% in asymptomatic and 6.1% in symptomatic patients. Regression analysis revealed that increasing severity of last neurologic event was significantly associated with an increasing risk of any in-hospital stroke or death in patients treated by both CEA and CAS (P <.004). However, the risk of any stroke or death did not significantly differ between asymptomatic patients and patients with amaurosis fugax before CEA or CAS (P =.219 for CEA, P =.124 for CAS). Increasing severity of last neurologic event is associated with an increasing risk of any in-hospital stroke or death in patients treated by CEA and CAS. The risk of any stroke or death did not differ between asymptomatic patients and patients with amaurosis fugax. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective There is currently no clear consensus regarding the optimal perioperative antiplatelet therapy regimen for carotid surgery. Therefore, associations between different antiplatelet therapies and the risk of stroke or death and perioperative complications after carotid endarterectomy on a national level in Germany were analyzed. Methods Overall, 117,973 elective carotid endarterectomies for asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis between 2010 and 2014 were included. Data were extracted from the statutory nationwide quality assurance database. The primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death until discharge from the hospital. Secondary outcomes were any major stroke or death, death alone, stroke, myocardial infarction, local bleeding, and any local complications (cranial nerve palsy, severe bleeding, acute occlusion). Descriptive statistics and multilevel multivariable regression analyses were applied. Single-agent therapy with aspirin was used as reference. Results Patients were predominantly male (68%), with a mean age of 71 years. Carotid stenosis was symptomatic in 40%. Of all patients, 82.8% were treated perioperatively by monotherapy with aspirin alone, 2.7% received other platelet inhibitors, and 4.8% of the patients were operated on under dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome occurred in 1.8% of all patients. Multilevel multivariable regression analysis revealed that the combined stroke and death rate of patients with no perioperative antiplatelet therapy was significantly higher (risk ratio [RR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.42) compared with the group of patients receiving monotherapy. The same was true for the major stroke and death rate (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.48). In contrast, dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower risk of death alone (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.88) but with a significantly higher rate of secondary bleeding requiring reoperation (RR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.88-2.50). Conclusions This study shows that the risk of stroke or death was significantly higher in patients without any perioperative antiplatelet therapy. In contrast, dual antiplatelet therapy vs aspirin monotherapy was associated with a lower risk only of perioperative death but with a higher risk of neck bleeding until discharge. Perioperative antiplatelet therapy was significantly associated with a decreased in-hospital stroke and death risk. Further studies are needed to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of single vs dual antiplatelet therapy. Graphical abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The aim of this study was to analyze the association between intraprocedural and periprocedural variables and in-hospital stroke or death rate after carotid artery stenting. Background In Germany, all open surgical and endovascular procedures on the extracranial carotid artery must be documented in a statutory nationwide quality assurance database. Methods A total of 13,086 carotid artery stenting procedures for asymptomatic (63.9%) or symptomatic carotid stenosis (mean age 69.7 years, 69.7% men) between 2009 and 2014 were recorded. The following variables were analyzed: stent design, stent material, neurophysiological monitoring, periprocedural antiplatelet medication, and use of an embolic protection device. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke or death. Major stroke or death, any stroke, and death, all until discharge, were secondary outcomes. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) were assessed using multilevel multivariable regression analyses. Results The primary outcome occurred in 2.4% of the population (1.7% in asymptomatic and 3.7% in symptomatic patients). The multivariable analysis showed an independent association between the use of an embolic protection device and lower in-hospital rates of stroke or death (adjusted RR: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50 to 0.85), major stroke or death (adjusted RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.84), and stroke (adjusted RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.77). Regarding the occurrence of in-hospital death, there was no significant association (adjusted RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.35). None of the outcomes was associated with stent design, stent material, neurophysiological monitoring, or antiplatelet medication. Conclusions The use of an embolic protection device was independently associated with lower in-hospital risk for stroke or death, major stroke or death, and stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background—Associations between hospital volume and the risk of stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on a national level in Germany were analyzed. Methods and Results—Secondary data analysis using microdata from the nationwide statutory German quality assurance database on all surgical or endovascular carotid interventions on the extracranial carotid artery between 2009 and 2014. Hospitals were categorized into empirically determined quintiles according to the annual case volume. The resulting volume thresholds were 10, 25, 46, and 79 for CEA and 2, 6, 12, and 26 for CAS procedures. The primary outcome was any stroke or death before hospital discharge. For risk-adjusted analyses, a multilevel regression model was applied. The analysis included 161 448 CEA and 17 575 CAS procedures. In CEA patients, the crude risk of stroke or death decreased monotonically from 4.2% (95% confidence interval, 3.6%–4.9%) in low-volume hospitals (first quintile 1–10 CEA per year) to 2.1% (2.0%–2.2%) in hospitals providing ≥80 CEA per year (fifth quintile; P<0.001 for trend). The overall risk of any stroke or death in CAS patients was 3.7% (3.5%–4.0%), but no trend on annual volume was seen (P=0.304). Risk-adjusted analyses confirmed a significant inverse relationship between hospital volume (categorized or continuous) and the risk of stroke or death after CEA but not CAS procedures. Conclusions—An inverse volume–outcome relationship in CEA-treated patients was demonstrated. No significant association between hospital volume and the risk of stroke or death was found for CAS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The objective of this study was to describe characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for stroke in evolution (SIE) under routine conditions in Germany. Methods This secondary data analysis is based on the German statutory quality assurance database for carotid revascularization procedures. Patients with SIE who had undergone CEA or CAS were included. The primary outcome was any new stroke or all-cause death until hospital discharge. Descriptive statistics were calculated using statistical standard methods. To identify factors that are associated with the primary or secondary outcomes, a multilevel multivariable regression analysis was performed (exploratory approach). Results Between 2009 and 2014, a total of 5058 patients (mean age, 70 ± 11 years; 68% male) with SIE were treated with CEA (n = 3176) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/CAS (n = 1882). The primary outcome occurred in 9.0% and 11.7% after CEA and CAS, respectively. The multivariable regression analysis revealed that age (per 10-year increase: risk ratio [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.50), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (ASA class 4 and 5 vs ASA class 3: RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.65-3.32), ipsilateral degree of stenosis (occlusion vs severe stenosis: RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.29-2.79; low grade vs severe stenosis: RR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.55-6.02), and neurologic deficit on admission (modified Rankin scale score of 3-5 vs 0-2: RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.04-2.10) are significantly associated with the risk of stroke or death after emergency CEA for SIE. In patients treated with CAS, only age (per 10-year increase: RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.37-1.82), ASA class (ASA class 1 and 2 vs ASA class 3: RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95; ASA class 4 and class 5 vs ASA class 3: RR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.31-2.78), and ipsilateral degree of stenosis (moderate vs severe stenosis: RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77; occlusion vs severe stenosis: RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.18-2.25) were significantly associated with the primary outcome rate. Conclusions Emergency carotid revascularization is associated with a combined stroke or death rate of about 10% under routine conditions in Germany. Lower age, lower ASA class, moderate to high-grade stenosis, and less severe neurologic deficit preceding CEA potentially serve as protective factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]