Search

To examine the role of gastrin as a major mediator of meal-stimulated acid secretion at low and high intragastric pH, gastric acid secretory responses after exogenous and endogenous stimulation were studied in relation to circulating plasma gastrin levels in 19 healthy control subjects and in 18 patients with inactive duodenal ulcer disease. Gastrin was given intravenously in stepwise fourfold-increasing doses from 3.1 to 800 pmol.kg-1.h-1 over consecutive 30-minute periods. Circulating plasma gastrin and acid secretion rates, measured by intragastric titration, were compared with the values obtained during endogenous stimulation by intragastric meals of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 g% peptone at either pH 5.5 or pH 2.5. The studies showed that circulating gastrin is a major regulator of acid secretion in the presence of peptone in both healthy controls and subjects with duodenal ulcers. Patients with duodenal ulcers had higher acid secretion rates in response to endogenous and exogenous stimulation. In duodenal ulcer subjects and healthy controls, acid secretion in response to higher doses (2-8 g%) of peptone was inhibited at low intragastric pH. This pH inhibition could be fully explained by diminished gastrin release. Patients in the DU group differed from the controls by diminished inhibition of acid secretion at intragastric pH 2.5 when low doses (1 g%) of peptone meals were used. In summary, gastrin is a major regulator of endogenously stimulated acid secretion at high and low intragastric pH in healthy subjects. DU patients differ from healthy controls by higher total acid secretion rates and diminished inhibition of acid secretion when low concentrations of peptone are present in the stomach. (Gastroenterology 1992 Apr;102(4 Pt 1):1142-8)

To study the effect of oral supplemental calcium on colonic epithelial proliferation, 17 adenomatous polyp patients received 1.5 g Ca2+ as calcium carbonate daily during 12 weeks, while on a calcium constant diet, based on the patients' habitual diet. Seven subsequently continued calcium supplementation for 9 months without dietary restrictions. Epithelial proliferation rate in colonic biopsies, expressed as labelling index (%), was determined with 5-bromodeoxyuridine and immunohistochemistry. Biopsies were taken from the midsigmoid at time of polyp excision and at the end of the intervention period. Median labelling index increased from 6.1% before to 8.7% after 12 weeks calcium (n = 17, P < 0.02). This was due to increased labelling in the basal third of the crypts (11.9 vs 16%), whereas labelling in mid and luminal compartments was not affected. Labelling index remained increased after 1 year calcium supplementation at 8.8%. Crypt length was not affected by calcium. These results are in contrast to those of others, who have shown a decrease of rectal epithelial proliferation during similar doses of calcium. Therefore, the effect of nutritional intervention on colonic epithelial proliferation should be studied in biopsies taken not only from the rectum, but also from more proximal parts of the colon. Caution with respect to large scale intervention studies with calcium in high risk groups is mandatory.