Search

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine 6-month interim safety, effectiveness, and multimodal imageability of imageable glass microsphere yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a first-in-human trial. Imageable microspheres (Eye90 Microspheres; ABK Biomedical, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada), a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Breakthrough-Designated Device consisting of glass radiopaque 90Y microspheres visible on computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission CT (SPECT), were used to treat 6 subjects with unresectable HCC. Patients underwent selective (≤2 segments) treatment in a prospective open-label pilot trial. Key inclusion criteria included liver-only HCC, performance status ≤1, total lesion diameter ≤9 cm, and Child-Pugh A status. Prospective partition dosimetry was utilized. Safety (measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v5), multimodal imageability on CT and SPECT, and 3- and 6-month imaging response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were evaluated. Seven tumors in 6 subjects were treated and followed to 180 days. Administration success was 100%. Microsphere distribution measured by radiopacity on CT correlated with SPECT. Ninety-day target lesion complete response (CR) was observed in 3 of 6 subjects (50%) and partial response (PR) in 2 (33.3%). At 180 days, target lesion CR was maintained in 3 subjects (50%) and PR in 1 (16.7%). Two subjects could not be reassessed, having undergone intervening chemoembolization. All subjects reported adverse events (AEs), and 5 reported AEs related to treatment. There were no treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs. Radioembolization using imageable microspheres was safe and effective in 6 subjects with unresectable HCC at 6-month interim analysis. Microsphere distribution by radiopacity on CT correlated with radioactivity distribution by SPECT, providing previously unavailable CT-based tumor targeting information. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the accuracy and safety of 0.56 GBq resin yttrium-90 (90Y) (scout90Y) microspheres with those of technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) in predicting the therapeutic 90Y (Rx90Y) dose for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and Methods: This prospective single-arm clinical trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04172714) recruited patients with HCC. Patients underwent same-day mapping with MAA and scout90Y. Rx90Y activity was administered 3 days after mapping. Using paired t test and Pearson correlation, the tumor-to-normal ratio (TNR), lung shunt fraction (LSF), predicted mean tumor dose (TD), and nontumoral liver dose (NTLD) by MAA and scout90Y were compared with those by Rx90Y. Bland-Altman plots compared the level of agreement between the TNR and LSF of scout90Y and MAA with that of Rx90Y. The safety of scout90Y was evaluated by examining the discrepancy in extrahepatic activity between MAA and scout90Y.Results: Thirty patients were treated using 19 segmental and 14 nonsegmental (ie, 2 contiguous segments or nonsegmental) therapies. MAA had weak LSF, moderate TNR, and moderate TD linear correlation with Rx90Y. Scout90Y had a moderate LSF, strong TNR, strong TD, and very strong NTLD in correlation with those of Rx90Y. Furthermore, the TNR and LSF of scout90Y had a stronger agreement with those of Rx90Y than with those of MAA. In the nonsegmental subgroup, MAA had no significant correlation with the TD and NTLD of Rx90Y, whereas scout90Y had a very strong correlation with both of these factors. In the segmental subgroup, both MAA and scout90Y had a strong linear correlation with the TD and NTLD of Rx90Y.Conclusions: Compared with MAA, scout90Y is a more accurate surrogate for Rx90Y biodistribution for nonsegmental therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report outcomes of yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Materials and Methods: Retrospective review was performed of 115 patients at 6 tertiary care centers; 92 were treated with resin microspheres (80%), 22 were treated with glass microspheres (19%), and 1 was treated with both. Postintervention outcomes were compared between groups with χ2 tests. Survival after diagnosis and after treatment was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method.Results: Grade 3 laboratory toxicity was observed in 4 patients (4%); no difference in toxicity profile between resin and glass microspheres was observed (P = .350). Clinical toxicity per Society of Interventional Radiology criteria was noted in 29 patients (25%). Partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 was noted in 25% of patients who underwent embolization with glass microspheres and 3% of patients who were treated with resin microspheres (P = .008). Median overall survival (OS) from first diagnosis was 29 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21-37 mo) for all patients, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 85%, 31%, and 8%, respectively. Median OS after treatment was 11 months (95% CI, 8-13 mo), and 1- and 3-year OS rates were 44% and 4%, respectively. These estimates were not significantly different between resin and glass microspheres (P = .730 and P = .475, respectively). Five patients were able to undergo curative-intent resection after 90Y radioembolization (4%).Conclusions: This study provides observational data of treatment outcomes after 90Y radioembolization in patients with unresectable ICC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]