Search

Abstract Background As antibiotics predispose travelers to acquiring multidrug-resistant intestinal bacteria, they should no longer be considered a mainstay for treating travelers' diarrhea. It has been claimed that stand-by antibiotics are justified as a means to avoid visits to local healthcare providers which often lead to polypharmacy. Method We revisited the traveler data of 316 prospectively recruited volunteers with travelers' diarrhea by retrieving from questionnaires and health diaries information on antibiotic use, stand-by antibiotic carriage, and visits with local healthcare. Multivariable analysis was applied to identify factors associated with antibiotic use. Results Among our 316 volunteers with travelers' diarrhea, however, carrying stand-by antibiotics seemed not to reduce the rate of healthcare-seeking; on the contrary, antibiotic use was more frequent among stand-by antibiotic carriers (34%) than non-carriers (11%). Antibiotics were equally taken for severe and incapacitating travelers' diarrhea, but compared to non-carriers, stand-by antibiotic carriers resorted to medication also for mild/moderate (38% vs. 4%) and non-incapacitating disease (29% vs. 5%). Antibiotic use was associated with stand-by antibiotic carriage (OR 7.2; 95%CI 2.8–18.8), vomiting (OR 3.5; 95%CI 1.3–9.5), incapacitating diarrhea (OR 3.6; 95%CI 1.3–9.8), age (OR 1.03; 95%CI 1.00–1.05), and healthcare visit for diarrhea (OR 465.3; 95%CI 22.5–9633.6). Conclusions Carriage of stand-by antibiotics encouraged less cautious use of antibiotics. Recommendations involving prescription of antibiotics for all travelers require urgent revision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Overnight international travels made by Finns more than doubled during 1995–2015. To estimate risks and observe trends of travel-related notifiable sexually transmitted and food- and water-borne infections (STIs and FWIs) among travellers, we analysed national reports of gonorrhoea, syphilis, hepatitis A, shigellosis, campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis cases and related them to travel statistics. Method Cases notified as travel-related to the Finnish infectious diseases register were used as numerators and overnight stays of Statistics Finland surveys as denominator. We calculated overall risks (per 100,000 travellers) and assessed trends (using regression model) in various geographic regions. Results Of all travel-related cases during 1995–2015, 2304 were STIs and 70,929 FWIs. During 2012–2015, Asia-Oceania showed highest risk estimates for gonorrhoea (11.0; 95%CI, 9.5–13), syphilis (1.4; 0.93–2.1), salmonellosis (157; 151–164), and campylobacteriosis (135; 129–141), and Africa for hepatitis A (4.5; 2.5–7.9), and shigellosis (35; 28–43). When evaluating at country level, the highest risks of infections was found in Thailand, except for hepatitis A ranking Hungary the first. During 2000–2011, significantly decreasing trends occurred for most FWIs particularly in the European regions and for STIs in Russia-Baltics. Conclusions Our findings can be used in targeting pre-travel advice, which should also cover those visiting Thailand or European hepatitis A risk areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Travellers' diarrhoea (TD) is a common health problem among visitors to the (sub)tropics. Much research deals with aetiology, prevention, and post-infection sequalae, yet the data may not allow comparisons due to incompatible definitions of TD and No TD control groups. Method The impact of defining TD and No TD control groups was explored by revisiting our recent data. We set up two TD groups: classical TD i.e. ≥3 loose or liquid stools/day and WHO TD (diarrhoea as defined by the WHO) i.e. any diarrhoea, and four No TD groups by TD definition and timing (no classical/WHO TD during travel, no ongoing classical/WHO TD). Results TD was recorded for 37% versus 65% of subjects when using classical versus WHO definitions, respectively; the proportions of the various pathogens proved similar. The strictest criterion for the No TD control group (no WHO TD during travel) yielded pathogens among 61% and the least strict (no ongoing classical TD) among 73% of the travellers; the differences were greatest for enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and Campylobacter. Conclusions Definition of TD and control group design substantially impact on TD study results. The WHO definition yields more cases, but the pathogen selection is similar by both definitions. Design of the No TD control group was found critical: only those remaining asymptomatic throughout the journey should be included. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Among visitors to the (sub)tropics, 20–50% contract travellers' diarrhoea (TD) and 5–30% take antibiotics. While shortening the duration of illness, antimicrobials predispose to acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria. Therefore, liberal use is no longer advocated. Although antibiotics kill pathogens, no data support the view that they could prevent post-infectious sequelae. We investigated how antibiotic use for TD abroad impacts the pathogen findings at return. Materials and methods We revisited 456 travellers' clinical data and stool pathogens examined by qPCR for Salmonella , Yersinia, Campylobacter, Shigella , Vibrio cholerae and enteroaggregative (EAEC), enteropathogenic (EPEC), enterotoxigenic (ETEC), enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC) and enteroinvasive (EIEC) Escherichia coli . Results Among travellers with TD, antibiotic users had pathogen-positive samples less frequently than non-users (50% versus 83%). The difference was significant for EPEC (23% versus 47%) and EAEC (27% versus 54%), but not ETEC (17% versus 26%) or the other pathogens. Shigella /EIEC was found more often among antibiotic users than non-users (4% versus 1%). Conclusion Despite antibiotic treatment of TD, half of the users still had stool pathogens at return, reflecting either antibiotic resistance of pathogens or recolonisation/reinfection while abroad. Treatment of TD with antibiotics during travel should not be interpreted to indicate eradication of pathogens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background One third of travellers to the poor regions of the (sub)tropics become colonized by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE). Co-resistance to non-beta-lactam antibiotics complicates the treatment of potential ESBL-PE infections. Methods We analysed co-resistance to non-beta-lactams among travel-acquired ESBL-PE isolates of 90 visitors to the (sub)tropics with respect to major risk factors of colonization: destination, age, travellers' diarrhoea (TD) and antibiotic (AB) use. Results Of the ESBL-PE isolates, 53%, 52%, 73%, and 2% proved co-resistant to ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, co-trimoxazole, and nitrofurantoin, respectively. The rates were similar among those with (TD+) or without (TD-) travellers' diarrhoea. Among fluoroquinolone-users vs. AB non-users, the co-resistance rates for ciprofloxacin were 95% versus 37% (p = 0.001), for tobramycin 85% versus 43% (p = 0.005), co-trimoxazole 85% versus 68% (p = 0.146), and nitrofurantoin 5% versus 2% (p = 0.147). In multivariable analysis co-resistance to ciprofloxacin was associated with increasing age, fluoroquinolone use, and tobramycin resistance. Conlusions While TD predisposes to ESBL-PE non-selectively, antimicrobial use favours strains resistant to drug taken and, simultaneously, any drug with resistance genetically linked to the drug used. Antibiotics taken during travel predispose to ESBL-PE with a high co-resistance rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Although infections represent the most common health problem of travellers abroad, data on morbidity and incidences of various infections are scarce. Method Data on infections of Finnish travellers during 2010–2012 were retrieved from the database of SOS International, an assistance organization covering 95% of Finns requiring aid abroad. The study included 30,086 cases. For incidence calculation, the data were linked to the numbers of Finns visiting these regions during the same period as recorded by the Official Statistics of Finland. Results The incidence of infections was particularly high in Africa, southern Europe plus the eastern Mediterranean, and Asia plus Oceania. The most frequent diagnoses were acute gastroenteritis (38.0%) and respiratory-tract infections (RTI) (34.5%), followed by infections of the ear (12.6%), skin or subcutaneous tissue (5.1%), urogenital tract (4.2%), eye (3.1%), and systemic febrile infections (2.2%). Vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) accounted for 0.8% of cases, with varicella as most (49%) and influenza as second-most (27%) common. Conclusions Incidence of infections was higher in southern than in eastern and western Europe. Gastroenteritis and RTI proved the most frequent diagnoses, whereas systemic febrile infections were uncommon. Despite pre-travel immunizations, VPDs still occurred; pre-travel consultation should cover both varicella and influenza. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Looking at the worldwide emergency of antimicrobial resistance, international travellers appear to have a central role in spreading the bacteria across the globe. Travellers' diarrhoea (TD) is the most common disease encountered by visitors to the (sub)tropics. Both TD and its treatment with antibiotics have proved significant independent risk factors of colonization by resistant intestinal bacteria while travelling. Travellers should therefore be given preventive advice regarding TD and cautioned about taking antibiotics: mild or moderate TD does not require antibiotics. Logical alternatives are medications with effects on gastrointestinal function, such as loperamide. The present review explores literature on loperamide in treating TD. Adhering to manufacturer's dosage recommendations, loperamide offers a safe and effective alternative for relieving mild and moderate symptoms. Moreover, loperamide taken singly does no predispose to contracting MDR bacteria. Most importantly, we found no proof that would show antibiotics to be significantly more effective than loperamide in treating mild/moderate TD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibiotics predispose travellers to acquire multidrug-resistant bacteria, such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE). Although widely used in antimalarial prophylaxis, doxycycline has scarcely been studied in this respect. We explored the impact of doxycycline on rates of traveller's diarrhoea (TD), ESBL-PE acquisition and, particularly, doxycycline co-resistance among travel-acquired ESBL-PE in a sample of 412 visitors to low- and middle-income countries. We reviewed the literature on traveller studies of doxycycline/tetracycline resistance among stool pathogens and the impact of doxycycline on TD rates, ESBL-PE acquisition, and doxycycline/tetracycline resistance. The TD rates were similar for doxycycline users (32/46; 69.6%) and non-users (256/366; 69.9%). Of the 90 travel-acquired ESBL-PE isolates, 84.4% were co-resistant to doxycycline: 100% (11/11) among users and 82.3% (65/79) among non-users. The literature on doxycycline's effect on TD was not conclusive nor did it support a recent decline in doxycycline resistance. Although doxycycline did not increase ESBL-PE acquisition, doxycycline-resistance among stool pathogens proved more frequent for users than non-users. Our prospective data and the literature review together suggest the following: 1) doxycycline does not prevent TD; 2) doxycycline use favours acquisition of doxy/tetracycline-co-resistant intestinal bacteria; 3) although doxycycline does not predispose to travel-related ESBL-PE acquisition per se, it selects ESBL-PE strains co-resistant to doxycycline; 4) doxycycline resistance rates are high among stool bacteria in general with no evidence of any tendency to decrease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) rank among the most common infections encountered in health care, with an annual incidence of 12% for women. Despite the vast numbers of international travels (over 1.5 billion annually), no prospective studies have had primary focus on UTIs during travel. We recruited in 2008–17 international travelers who all filled out pre- and post-travel questionnaires. Incidence rates of UTI were calculated separately for both sexes. Multivariable analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for UTI during travel. In total 15/517 (2,9%) travelers acquired UTI during travel, yielding an annual incidence of 62% for female and 18% for male travelers. Travelers' diarrhea (TD) was identified as a factor predisposing to UTI (OR 9.2, 95% CI 1.5–+∞, p = 0.011); all UTI cases were recorded by travelers with TD. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study with a primary focus on UTI during travel. Our data reveal that among travelers the incidence of UTI far exceeds that reported for the general population. TD was identified as a major risk factor for the infection. Our results suggest TD prevention as a means of also preventing UTI during travel. • Urinary tract infection are more common among travelers than in general population. • All UTI cases were identified among visitors to the tropics. • Travelers' diarrhea predisposes to urinary tract infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hepatitis A vaccine is the most frequently used travel vaccine, yet data are scarce about its ability to induce protection in patients with concurrent immunosuppressive treatment. We assessed the immunogenicity of this vaccine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tumour necrosis factor-inhibitors (TNFi) and/or methotrexate (MTX). Methods: Hepatitis A vaccine was administered to non-immune RA patients at 0 and 6 months. Hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibodies were assessed at 0, 1, 6, 7, 12, and 24 months with a quantitative Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immuno Assay (CMIA) for HAV-IgG. Samples from month 1, 6, and 7 were, in addition, analysed with a microparticle EIA (MEIA) for anti-HAV IgM + IgG. Results: The final study population consisted of 53 patients treated with TNFi (n = 15), TNFi + MTX (n = 21) or MTX (n = 17). One and six months after the first dose, 10% and 33% of the patients had attained seroprotection. One and six months after the second dose 83% and 72% were seroprotected. At month 24, 86% of the vaccinees showed protective levels. Conclusions: Two doses of hepatitis A vaccine at a 6-month interval provided protection for most immunosuppressed RA patients. A single dose does not seem to afford sufficient protection to this group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The worldwide population of forcibly displaced people has increased over the past decade, approaching 80 million and encompassing more than 30 million refugees and asylum seekers. Research into refugee and migrant health has remained scarce, however. To investigate the reasons for hospital admissions of refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants, we collected medical data from Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) records 2010–20. The study population consisted of 647 patients originally from 54 different countries, mainly Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan. Among adults, 40.9% of the admissions were related to pregnancy. For minors, the group comprising congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities accounted for most hospitalizations, followed by diseases of the digestive or nervous system. Every fifth patient (19.3%) was admitted because of an infection: adults mostly for urinary tract infection (16.3%), pneumonia (14.1%), and tuberculosis (9.8%), and minors for acute gastroenteritis (15.2%). Infectious reason was more frequent within two months after immigration than later. Our data reveal a unique admission profile for forced migrants: in addition to infectious diseases, a particularly high rate of obstetric diagnoses was recorded, the two ranking as the most common reasons for hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The diagnostics of travellers' diarrhoea (TD) has been revolutionised by multiplex qPCR assays. While mostly of bacterial aetiology, viruses and parasites account for the disease among 10–20% of travellers. Despite this, prospective studies applying qPCR assays remain scarce that cover not only bacteria, such as the various diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (DEC), but also viral and parasitic pathogens. We analysed by qPCR pre- and post-travel stool samples of 146 Finnish travellers for bacterial, viral and parasitic pathogens: enteropathogenic (EPEC), enteroaggregative (EAEC), enterotoxigenic (ETEC), enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC), and enteroinvasive (EIEC) E. coli; Shigella , Campylobacter , Salmonella , Yersinia and Vibrio cholerae ; norovirus G1 and G2, rotavirus, enteroviruses, and sapovirus; and Giardia lamblia , Entamoeba histolytica , and Cryptosporidium. Symptoms and medication data during travel were collected by questionnaires. We detected bacterial pathogens in 102/146 samples (69.9%; EAEC, EPEC, ETEC most common), viral ones in 13 (8.9%; norovirus most common), and parasitic ones in one (0.7%; Giardia). Noroviruses were associated with severe symptoms (23.5% versus non-severe 4.9%). In the TD group, 41.7% (5/12) of those with viral pathogens (vs. 13.3%; 11/83 without) took antibiotics. Viral pathogens, particularly noroviruses, prevail in severe TD. The symptoms of viral disease are often severe and lead to unwarranted use of antibiotics. • Prospectively collected stool specimens were tested by qPCR for bacteria, viruses and parasites. • Viruses were associated with severe TD. • Viral TD was associated with particularly high rate of antibiotic use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Exposure, risks and immunity of healthcare workers (HCWs), a vital resource during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, warrant special attention. HCWs at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, filled in questionnaires and provided serum samples for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody screening by Euroimmun IgG assay in March–April 2020. Positive/equivocal findings were confirmed by Abbott and microneutralization tests. Positivity by two of the three assays or RT-PCR indicated a Covid-19 case (CoV+). The rate of CoV(+) was 3.3% (36/1095) and seropositivity 3.0% (33/1095). CoV(+) was associated with contact with a known Covid-19 case, and working on a Covid-19-dedicated ward or one with cases among staff. The rate in the Covid-19-dedicated ICU was negligible. Smoking and age <55 years were associated with decreased risk. CoV(+) was strongly associated with ageusia, anosmia, myalgia, fatigue, fever, and chest pressure. Seropositivity was recorded for 89.3% of those with prior documented RT-PCR-positivity and 2.4% of those RT-PCR-negative. The rate of previously unidentified cases was 0.7% (8/1067) and asymptomatic ones 0% (0/36). Undiagnosed and asymptomatic cases among HCWs proved rare. An increased risk was associated with Covid-19-dedicated wards. Particularly high rates were seen for wards with liberal HCW-HCW contacts, highlighting the importance of social distancing also among HCWs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a major pathogen causing travellers' diarrhoea (TD) among visitors to low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Scant data are available on rates of travel-acquired ETEC producing heat-labile (LT) and/or heat-stable (ST) toxin or its subtypes, STh (human) and STp (porcine) in various geographic regions, and on clinical pictures associated with each toxin. Using qPCR, we analysed LT, STh, and STp in stools positive for ETEC in a prospective study among 103 Finnish travellers visiting LMIC. They filled in questionnaires and provided stool samples before and after travel. We scrutinized geographic distribution of LT, STh, and STp ETEC findings, and association between these different ETEC subtypes and moderate/severe TD. Among the 103 stool samples positive for ETEC toxins, the rate for LT was 76%, for STh 26%, and STp 41%. The rate for LT-only was 44%, for STh-only 6%, STp-only 16%, LT + STh 10%, LT + STp 15%, STh + STp 3%, and LT + STh + STp 8%. Findings varied by destination; the rates of LT, STh, and STp were 79%, 21%, and 57%, respectively, in Southern Asia (n = 14); 85%, 10%, and 20% in South-eastern Asia (n = 20); 84%, 13%, and 29% in Eastern Africa (n = 31); and 56%, 50%, and 63% in Western Africa (n = 32), respectively. Of travellers positive for LT, STh, and STp, 83%, 100%, and 88%, encountered TD; 35%, 55%, and 41% reported moderate/severe TD. STh was associated with moderate/severe TD. Toxin findings varied by destination; multiple toxins were commonly detected. Moderate/severe TD was reported most frequently by subjects with STh-ETEC. • ETEC is a major cause of childhood diarrhoea in LMICs and travellers' diarrhoea among visitors to these destinations. • The diarrhoeal symptoms of ETEC are mediated by its LT and ST toxins. ST-toxin is divided into the subtypes STh and STp. • This prospective study explored the distribution of ETEC toxins among travellers to various geographic destinations. • Toxin findings varied by geographic location. Multiple toxin types proved common. • STh was associated with moderate/severe diarrhoea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Every year, 80 million tourists traveling to tropical and subtropical areas contract traveler's diarrhea (TD). Forty percent to 80% of cases are caused by bacteria, yet clinical diagnostic tests are available to identify only a few of the strains that cause TD. We aimed to develop a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay to identify all major pathogens in stool samples. Methods: We developed a low-cost, high-throughput, multiplex qPCR assay for simultaneous detection of 9 bacterial pathogens in stool samples: Salmonella, Yersinia, Campylobacter, and Vibrio cholerae, as well as Shigella or enteroinvasive Escherichia coli, enterohemorrhagic E coli, enterotoxigenic E coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E coli (EAEC), and enteropathogenic E coli (EPEC). The assay was validated using positive (n = 245) and negative (n = 243) control strains, as well as preselected positive and negative stool samples. In addition, stool samples were collected from 96 returning travelers with TD. The findings were compared with those from routine diagnostic tests. Results: The assay detected the bacterial strains with 100% sensitivity and specificity, compared with results from the reference tests. Of all stool samples collected from travelers with TD, EPEC was found in 47%, EAEC in 46%, ETEC in 22%, enterohemorrhagic E coli in 7%, Campylobacter in 6%, Shigella or enteroinvasive E coli in 2%, and Salmonella in 2%. Multiple pathogens were found in 37% of all samples. Conclusions: We developed a low-cost, high-throughput qPCR assay for use in routine diagnostic analysis and research. It detects the pathogenic bacteria most commonly associated with TD in stool samples with 100% sensitivity and specificity, compared with reference methods. The assay requires 4 hours, whereas current detection methods require 1 to 7 days. At least 1 TD pathogen was identified in stool samples from 76% of returning travelers, whereas conventional methods found a pathogen in only 17%. The most commonly detected bacteria were EPEC, EAEC, and ETEC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]