Search

Non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an important clinical stage of prostate cancer, prior to morbidity and mortality from clinical metastases. In particular, the introduction of novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) has changed the therapeutic landscape in nmCRPC. Given recent developments in this field, we update our recommendations for the management of nmCRPC.

Optimal therapy for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) includes intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). However, about 25-45% of patients do not benefit from BCG immunotherapy, and there is no biomarker to guide therapy. Also, many questions regarding BCG mechanisms of action remain unanswered. To identify genomic biomarkers and characterize the underlying mechanism of benefit from BCG in NMIBC. Pre-treatment archival index-tumors of 35 patients with NMIBC treated with BCG were analyzed by whole-exome sequencing (WES). Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and neoantigen load (NAL) were correlated with BCG response rate (RR) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The presence of deleterious mutations in DNA damage response (DDR) genes was also compared between BCG-responsive (BCG-R, N = 17) and unresponsive (BCG-UR, N = 18) subgroups. TMB and NAL were higher in BCG-R compared to BCG-UR patients (median TMB 4.9 vs. 2.8 mutations/Mb, P = 0.017 and median NAL 100 vs. 65 neoantigens, P = 0.032). Improved RR and RFS were observed in patients with high vs. low TMB (RR 71% vs. 28%, P = 0.011 and mRFS 38.0 vs. 15.0 months, P = 0.009) and with high vs. low NAL (RR 71% vs. 28%, P = 0.011 and mRFS 36.0 vs. 18.5 months, P = 0.016). The presence of deleterious mutations in DDR genes was associated with improved RFS (mRFS 35.5 vs. 11.0 months, P = 0.017). In our cohort, improved outcomes after BCG immunotherapy were observed in patients with high TMB, high NAL and deleterious mutations in DDR genes. BCG may induce tumor-specific immune response by enhancing the recognition of neoantigens.

•Cardiovascular and thromboembolic adverse events of intense neoadjuvant hormone therapy are underreported in clinical trials;•We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the incidence of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events among patients with localized prostate cancer receiving neoadjuvant ARSIs prior to prostatectomy in prospective trials.•Our results corroborate the pre-clinical hypothesis of an increased risk of cardiovascular and thromboembolic adverse events associated to neoadjuvant hormone therapy following radical prostatectomy.•Relevant incidence of high-grade hypertension adverse events was observed, with significant increase in the proportion of events with the combination therapy.

ABSTRACTHundreds of trials are being conducted to evaluate combination of newer targeted drugs as well as immunotherapy. Our aim was to compare efficacy and safety of combination versus single non-cytotoxic anticancer agents. We searched PubMed (01/01/2001 to 03/06/2018) (and, for immunotherapy, ASCO and ESMO abstracts (2016 through March 2018)) for randomized clinical trials that compared a single non-cytotoxic agent (targeted, hormonal, or immunotherapy) versus a combination with another non-cytotoxic partner. Efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated in a meta-analysis using a linear mixed-effects model (guidelines per PRISMA Report).We included 95 randomized comparisons (single vs. combination non-cytotoxic therapies) (59.4%, phase II; 41.6%, phase III trials) (29,175 patients (solid tumors)). Combinations most frequently included a hormonal agent and a targeted small molecule (23%). Compared to single non-cytotoxic agents, adding another non-cytotoxic drug increased response rate (odds ratio [OR]=1.61, 95%CI 1.40-1.84)and prolonged progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.75, 95%CI 0.69-0.81)and overall survival (HR=0.87, 95%CI 0.81-0.94) (all p<0.001), which was most pronounced for the association between immunotherapy combinations and longer survival. Combinations also significantlyincreased the risk of high-grade toxicities (OR=2.42, 95%CI 1.98-2.97) (most notably for immunotherapy and small molecule inhibitors) and mortality at least possibly therapy related (OR: 1.33, 95%CI 1.15-1.53) (both p<0.001) (absolute mortality = 0.90% (single agent) versus 1.31% (combinations)) compared to single agents. In conclusion, combinations of non-cytotoxic drugs versus monotherapy in randomized cancer clinical trials attenuated safety, but increased efficacy, with the balance tilting in favor of combination therapy, based on the prolongation in survival.