1. Comparative study of National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) chest algorithm and extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (E-FAST) in the early detection of blunt chest injuries in polytrauma patients.
- Author
-
Attia, Yasmin Z., Elgeleel, Nashwa M. Abd, El-Hariri, Hazem M., Ellabban, Gouda M., El-SETOUHY, Maged, Hirshon, Jon Mark, Elbaih, Adel H, and El-Shinawi, Mohamed
- Abstract
• Chest injuries represent one of the most common diagnoses in severely injured patients. Chest imaging plays a prominent role in the assessment of patients with blunt trauma. A reliable, economic, bedside, and rapidly accomplished screening test can be pivotal. • We aimed to compare the accuracy of E-FAST to that of the NEXUS chest algorithm in detecting blunt chest injuries. • Our study concluded that E-FAST is highly specific for the detection of hemothorax, pneumothorax, and chest injuries compared with the NEXUS chest algorithm, which demonstrated the lowest specificity. However, the NEXUS chest algorithm showed a higher sensitivity than E-FAST and hence can be used effectively to rule out thoracic injury. • The African Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the African Federation for Emergency Medicine. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed in particular at supporting emergency care across Africa I understand the objectives of the journal and have formatted the manuscript to fit the style and needs of the journal. Chest imaging plays a prominent role in the assessment of patients with blunt trauma. Selection of the right approach at the right time is fundamental in the management of patients with blunt chest trauma
. [1] A reliable, economic, bedside, and rapidly accomplished screening test can be pivotal. [2] The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of extended- focused assessment with sonography for trauma (E-FAST) to that of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilisation Study (NEXUS) chest algorithm in detecting blunt chest injuries. This descriptive cross-sectional study included 50 polytrauma patients with blunt chest trauma from the emergency centre of Suez Canal University Hospital. E-FAST and computed tomography (CT) were conducted, followed by reporting of NEXUS criteria for all patients. Blinding of the E-FAST performer and CT reporter were confirmed. The results of both the NEXUS algorithm and E-FAST were compared with CT chest results. The NEXUS algorithm had 100% sensitivity and 15.3% specificity, and E-FAST had 70% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity, in the detection of pneumothorax. In the detection of hemothorax, the sensitivity and specificity of the NEXUS algorithm were 90% and 7.5%, respectively, whereas E-FAST had a lower sensitivity of 80% and a higher specificity of 97.5%. E-FAST is highly specific for the detection of hemothorax, pneumothorax, and chest injuries compared with the NEXUS chest algorithm, which demonstrated the lowest specificity. However, the NEXUS chest algorithm showed a higher sensitivity than E-FAST and hence can be used effectively to rule out thoracic injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF