Search

A method to study electrically induced distal colonic motility in the rat in vivois reported. The animals were anaesthetized with methohexital and chloralose and were artificially ventilated. Motility of a segment (2 cm) of the distal colon was monitored as volume changes of an intraluminal balloon, introduced via the anus. Local electrical stimulation of the wall of the segment was achieved by means of a bipolar electrode folded around the gut. Stimulations produced reproducible contractile responses in a frequency dependent fashion. Stimulation characteristics resembled those of other autonomic neuro‐effector systems. The adrenergic neuron‐blocker, guanethidine, significantly lowered colonic tone, but had no other effects on spontaneous or electrically induced motility. Atropine significantly lowered colonic tone. After the administration of this compound the electrically induced contractions were significantly smaller with a shorter duration and, furthermore, appeared upon the cessation of stimulation (‘off’ or ‘rebound’ contraction). Following the administration of tetrodotoxin (TTX, given close i.a. via a cannula with its tip in distal aorta) basal colonic tone and the number of spontaneously occurring contractions increased. The amplitude and duration of the electrically induced responses were significantly attenuated and, furthermore, appeared as ‘rebound’ contractions which were preceded by a relaxation. Such TTX‐resistant responses may be myogenic, but a neurogenic origin cannot be excluded. The present study showed that local electrical stimulation of the distal colon elicits cholinergic contractions, but also atropine‐ and TTX‐resistant motor responses.

1. The effects of electrical stimulation of the peripheral end of the cervical vagal nerve on jejunal motility were investigated in anaesthetized cats, pretreated with guanethidine, with sectioned splanchnic nerves and ligated adrenal vessels. Motility was monitored as volume changes of an intraluminal balloon. 2. Vagal stimulation elicited frequency‐dependent hypermotility with a short latency. Relaxatory events were also observed, which could indicate the presence of a non‐adrenergic inhibitory pathway. 3. After atropine treatment, contractions and relaxations could still be elicited. The former were compared to cholinergic contractions and showed a lower maximal amplitude and a longer latency to onset. Moreover, they were antagonized by 80‐100% by the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone. 4. Vagal stimulation after hemicholinium, given in order to deplete the preganglionic acetylcholine content, elicited naloxone‐sensitive contractions. This suggests that a subpopulation of the vagal preganglionic fibres is non‐cholinergic. 5. Isolation of the balloon‐containing segment did not qualitatively alter the responses, indicating that the vagal fibres reach the small intestine via the paravascular mesenteric nerves. 6. It is concluded that cholinergic and non‐adrenergic, non‐cholinergic (NANC) contractions, as well as relaxations, could be elicited by efferent vagal stimulation. The NANC contractions seem to result from the activation of opioid receptors causing disinhibition of a tonic neurogenic restraint on the gut muscle.