1. Prophylaxis versus pre-emptive treatment for infective and inflammatory complications of surgical third molar removal: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial with sustained release amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (1000/62.5mg).
- Author
-
Lacasa, J.M., Jiménez, J.A., Ferrás, V., Bossom, M., Sóla-Morales, O., García-Rey, C., Aguilar, L., and Garau, J.
- Subjects
CLINICAL medicine ,MEDICAL research ,CLINICAL trials ,EDEMA - Abstract
Abstract: The most common complications after surgical extraction of the third mandibular molar are trismus, oedema or swelling, local pain, dysphagia and infection. The aim of this comparative, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of two sustained release amoxicillin/clavulanate regimens in the reduction of infection after third molar extractive surgery. A total of 225 patients were randomized into three equal groups: placebo, prophylaxis with single pre-surgical dose of two tablets amoxicillin/clavulanate 1000/62.5mg, and pre-emptive post-surgery therapy with two tablets amoxicillin/clavulanate 1000/62.5mg BID for 5 days. A higher rate of infection (P =0.006) was found among patients receiving placebo (16%) than those receiving single-dose prophylaxis (5.3%) or 5-day pre-emptive therapy (2.7%). A relationship between both the duration (13.8% for long versus 7.4% for medium versus 1.6% for short) and difficulty (12.7% with ostectomy versus 3.5% without ostectomy; P =0.011) of surgical procedure and incidence of subsequent infection was also observed. Both prophylactic and therapeutic regimens versus placebo achieved greater reduction of pain after surgery on day 3 (P =0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed a risk of infection of 24%, 9% and 4% for ostectomy with placebo, prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment, respectively, whereas it was 7%, 2% and 1% if ostectomy was not performed. Pre-emptive therapy with the oral sustained release amoxicillin/clavulanate formulation reduced the rate of subsequent infection in patients undergoing ostectomy. Prophylaxis was beneficial in simpler procedures and may be indicated in cases where ostectomy is not performed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF