Search

We report long-term outcomes from a pooled analysis of patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) less than 1% enrolled in phase III studies of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy.

Although comprehensive biomarker testing is recommended for all patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before initiation of first-line treatment, tissue availability can limit testing. Genomic testing in liquid biopsies can be utilized to overcome the inherent limitations of tissue sampling and identify the most appropriate biomarker-informed treatment option for patients. The Blood First Assay Screening Trial is a global, open-label, multicohort trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of multiple therapies in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and targetable alterations identified by liquid biopsy. We present data from Cohort D (ROS1-positive). Patients ≥18 years of age with stage IIIB/IV, ROS1-positive NSCLC detected by liquid biopsies received entrectinib 600 mg daily. At data cutoff (November 2021), 55 patients were enrolled and 54 had measurable disease. Cohort D met its primary endpoint: the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator was 81.5%, which was consistent with the ORR from the integrated analysis of entrectinib (investigator-assessed ORR, 73.4%; data cutoff May 2019, ≥12 months of follow-up). The safety profile of entrectinib was consistent with previous reports. These results demonstrate consistency with those from the integrated analysis of entrectinib in patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC identified by tissue-based testing, and support the clinical value of liquid biopsies to inform clinical decision-making. The integration of liquid biopsies into clinical practice provides patients with a less invasive diagnostic method than tissue-based testing and has faster turnaround times that may expedite the reaching of clinical decisions in the advanced/metastatic NSCLC setting. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03178552.

Sitravatinib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting TYRO3, AXL, MERTK receptors, and vascular epithelial growth factor receptor 2, can shift the tumor microenvironment toward an immunostimulatory state. Combining sitravatinib with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) may augment antitumor activity.

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is being explored as a predictive biomarker for cancer immunotherapy outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer. BFAST (NCT03178552)—an open-label, global, multicohort trial—evaluated the safety and efficacy of first-line targeted therapies or immunotherapy in patients with unresectable Stage IIIB or IV advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who were selected for biomarker status using blood-based targeted next-generation sequencing. In the Phase 3 cohort C evaluating blood-based (b)TMB as a biomarker of atezolizumab efficacy, patients with bTMB of ≥10 (N= 471) were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab or platinum-based chemotherapy per local standard of care. Cohort C did not meet its primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the population with bTMB of ≥16 (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.59, 1.00; P= 0.053). Adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal occurred in 10% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 20% in the chemotherapy arm. Adverse events of special interest occurred in 42% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 26% in the chemotherapy arm. A prespecified exploratory analysis compared the bTMB clinical trial assay with the FoundationOne Liquid Companion Diagnostic assay and showed high concordance between assays. Additional exploration of bTMB to identify optimal cutoffs, confounding factors, assay improvements or cooperative biomarkers is warranted.

In cohort G of KEYNOTE-021 (NCT02039674), first-line pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-carboplatin significantly improved the objective response rate and progression-free survival versus chemotherapy alone with manageable toxicity in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. We report the long-term outcomes from this study.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is currently accelerating. Patients with locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) may require treatment in locations where resources are limited, and the prevalence of infection is high. Patients with LA-NSCLC frequently present with comorbidities that increase the risk of severe morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. These risks may be further increased by treatments for LA-NSCLC. Although guiding data is scarce, we present an expert thoracic oncology multidisciplinary (radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgical oncology) consensus of alternative strategies for the treatment of LA-NSCLC during a pandemic. The overarching goals of these approaches are the following: (1) reduce the number of visits to a health care facility, (2) reduce the risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus-2, (3) attenuate the immunocompromising effects of lung cancer therapies, and (4) provide effective oncologic therapy. Patients with resectable disease can be treated with definitive nonoperative management if surgical resources are limited or the risks of perioperative care are high. Nonoperative options include chemotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy, and radiation therapy with sequential schedules that may or may not affect long-term outcomes in an era in which immunotherapy is available. The order of treatments may be on the basis of patient factors and clinical resources. Whenever radiation therapy is delivered without concurrent chemotherapy, hypofractionated schedules are appropriate. For patients who are confirmed to have COVID-19, usually, cancer therapies may be withheld until symptoms have resolved with negative viral test results. The risk of severe treatment-related morbidity and mortality is increased for patients undergoing treatment for LA-NSCLC during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adapting alternative treatment strategies as quickly as possible may save lives and should be implemented through communication with the multidisciplinary cancer team.

At the prior data cutoff (February 9, 2017) the ALEX trial showed superior investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) for alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive, advanced NSCLC (hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% confidence interval: 0.34–0.65, p< 0.001). The median PFS in the alectinib arm was not reached versus 11.1 months with crizotinib. Retrospective analyses suggest that the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene-ALK variant (EML4-ALK) may influence ALK-inhibitor treatment benefit. We present updated analyses, including exploratory subgroup analysis by EML4-ALKvariant, after an additional 10 months’ follow-up (cutoff December 1, 2017).

Anti-EGFR agents are standard treatments for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. The feasibility of combining erlotinib or gefitinib with the anti–programmed death 1 immunotherapy pembrolizumab was evaluated in the phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-021 study (NCT02039674).

Activation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family through fusion with various partners has been described in multiple cancer types, including NSCLC. FGFR inhibitors are currently being evaluated clinically for patients whose tumors harbor these fusions.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of maintenance pembrolizumab in patients with extensive-stage SCLC after treatment with platinum and etoposide.

IMPORTANCE: Treatment choice for lung squamous cell carcinoma could be aided by identifying predictive biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether patient outcomes in the LUX-Lung 8 trial were associated with ERBB gene family member aberrations in tumor specimens. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Ad hoc secondary analysis of the LUX-Lung 8 trial conducted at 183 centers in 23 countries from March 30, 2012, to January 30, 2014. Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV lung squamous cell carcinoma with progressive disease after 4 or more cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Tumor genetic analysis (TGA) was performed using next-generation sequencing in a cohort enriched for patients with progression-free survival (PFS) of more than 2 months. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression levels were assessed by immunohistochemistry in a separate cohort of patients from the LUX-Lung 8 population. Associations of PFS and overall survival (OS) with ERBB gene alterations and EGFR expression levels were assessed. This analysis was conducted from February 26, 2015, to June 12, 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with afatinib dimaleate (40 mg/d; n = 398) or erlotinib hydrochloride (150 mg/d; n = 397). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Overall survival, PFS, pooled and individual ERBB gene mutations, ERBB copy number alterations, and EGFR expression. RESULTS: Tumor specimens from 245 patients were eligible for next-generation sequencing (TGA subset: 132 patients treated with afatinib; 113 patients treated with erlotinib). In this population, outcomes were improved with afatinib vs erlotinib treatment (PFS: median, 3.5 vs 2.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92; P = .01; OS: median, 8.4 vs 6.6 months; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-1.05; P = .12). Of 245 patients in the TGA subset, 53 (21.6%) had tumors with 1 or more ERBB mutations. Among afatinib-treated patients, PFS (median, 4.9 vs 3.0 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37-1.02; P = .06) and OS (median, 10.6 vs 8.1 months; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47-1.17; P = .21) were longer among those with ERBB mutation–positive disease than among those without. The presence of HER2 mutations was associated with favorable PFS and OS following afatinib vs erlotinib treatment. There was no apparent association between copy number alteration or EGFR expression level and outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Next-generation sequencing may help identify patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma who would derive additional benefit from treatment with afatinib. The role of ERBB mutations, particularly HER2 mutations, as predictive biomarkers for afatinib treatment in this setting warrants further evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01523587

The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as second- or third-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC in the primary (n = 850) and secondary (n = 1225) efficacy populations of the randomized phase III OAK study (respectively referred to as the intention-to-treat [ITT] 850 [ITT850] and ITT1225) at an updated data cutoff were assessed.

The risk for development of a second primary lung cancer (SPLC) after treatment of an initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) is around 1% to 2% per patient per year. The present screening and surveillance guidelines do not adequately address this particular patient population.

Atezolizumab is a humanised antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 and programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 and B7-1 interactions, reinvigorating anticancer immunity. We assessed its efficacy and safety versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in lung cancer patients undergoing pulmonary resection surgery with marginal lung function.Methods Short-term outcomes of 42 patients with forced expiratory volume in 1?s?

The Blood First Assay Screening Trial revealed the clinical applicability of blood-based next-generation sequencing to identify patients with ALK-positive NSCLC for alectinib treatment. To understand the relationship between tissue-based versus blood-based testing, we retrospectively investigated concordance between VENTANA ALK (D5F3) CDx immunohistochemistry and the FoundationACT (FACT; Foundation Medicine, Inc.) plasma assay, and compared clinical efficacy between phase 3 ALEX study subpopulations.

Lorlatinib, a potent, selective third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), exhibited overall and intracranial antitumor activity in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) have demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly those with tumors that have EGFR‐TK domain mutations. Moreover, the EGFR and cyclooxygenase (COX)‐2 pathways are known to enhance the procarcinogenic effects of each other in different tumor types. Therefore, it was hypothesized that tumor EGFR mutation status may influence the effectiveness of simultaneous EGFR and COX‐2 inhibition in patients with NSCLC.Three NSCLC cell lines with varying EGFR mutation status and sensitivities to EGFR‐TKIs were selected: H3255 (L858R), H1650 (del E746‐A750), and H1781 (wild‐type EGFR). Cells were treated with erlotinib, gefitinib, or celecoxib alone, and the combination of both EGFR‐TKI inhibitors with celecoxib. Cell survival and apoptosis was assessed and correlated with the expression of COX‐2, EGFR, pEGFR, Akt, pAkt, expression, and derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2).Celecoxib by itself was found to have no effects on cell growth or apoptosis in any of the cell lines. Erlotinib and gefitinib inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis in both mutant cell lines and did so in H1781 cells at 10‐fold higher concentrations. Celecoxib when added to erlotinib or gefitinib significantly enhanced the antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects in both mutant cell lines but had no additional effects in H1781 cells. Greater down‐regulation of COX‐2, EGFR, pEGFR, Akt, pAkt, and PGE2 was found when H3255 cells were treated with the combination compared with any of the single agents alone.The results of the current study demonstrate that the effectiveness of the addition of celecoxib to an EGFR‐TKI is significantly greater in NSCLC cells with EGFR mutations, which is likely due to more complete inhibition of both pathways. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive tumor that is increasing in incidence all over the world, even though its incidence has leveled off in the United States. Asbestos exposure is considered the main risk factor for mesothelioma. Some experts believe that exposure to simian virus 40 may also play a role. Pleural mesothelioma accounts for 90% of all tumors, although mesotheliomas can occur in other serosal surfaces. Histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and sometimes electron microscopy are required to distinguish mesothelioma from other tumors involving the pleura. Performance status and sarcomatoid histology are among the most important prognostic factors. Median survival for pleural mesothelioma is 12 months from diagnosis. Recent data have demonstrated the benefits of chemotherapy in patients with good performance status. The role of aggressive surgery, such as extrapleural pneumonectomy, remains ill defined, though it should be considered in early-stage disease. Multimodality regimens are being evaluated to improve upon the current outcome of these patients. With greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of mesothelioma, there is hope of developing novel agents that are more effective.

Clinical trials may offer patients innovative therapeutic options with potentially better outcomes, which are particularly relevant for patients afflicted with lung carcinoma, because current therapies provide only modest survival benefits. Only approximately 5% of patients with newly diagnosed cancer participate in clinical trials nationwide, and African‐American (AA) patients are particularly under‐represented.To determine predictors of clinical trials enrollment, the authors reviewed the medical records of 427 patients with lung carcinoma (175 AA patients and 252 non‐AA patients) who were eligible for clinical trials between 1994 and 1998 at the Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, Michigan. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association of patient demographic characteristics and clinical trial enrollment.Ninety‐one patients (21%) were enrolled onto a lung cancer clinical trial during the period of the current study. Enrollment was associated significantly with race (P < 0.001), gender (P = 0.048), age (P = 0.005), and insurance type (P = 0.024). After multivariable adjustment, only race and gender remained significant predictors of enrollment. AA patients were less likely to enroll than non‐AA patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.485; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.243–0.966), and men were more likely than women to enroll (OR, 1.812; 95% CI, 1.033–3.178).The current results suggest disparities by race and gender in the enrollment of patients onto lung cancer clinical trials and support the need to improve educational and outreach endeavors that would make clinical trials available to a wider range of eligible patients. Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon malignancy that is locally invasive and rapidly fatal. The majority of patients with mesothelioma are not candidates for curative surgical resection. Chemotherapy has yielded only modest results in these patients. Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate that is being evaluated in many tumor types. Recent single-agent data and data in combination with cisplatin have suggested that pemetrexed has therapeutic benefits in patients with malignant mesothelioma. This article summarizes the data regarding pemetrexed in the treatment of malignant mesothelioma and the potential novel combinations involving the drug that may be used in the future for the treatment of the disease.

We analyzed data from acommunity-based cancer database over a 26-year period in order tocharacterize clinicopathologic differences between black and whitepatients with lung cancer, and to identify relevant temporal trends inincidence and survival.

The Blood First Assay Screening Trial is an ongoing open-label, multicohort study, prospectively evaluating the relationship between blood-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) detection of actionable genetic alterations and activity of targeted therapies/immunotherapy in treatment-naive advanced/metastatic NSCLC. We present data from the ALK-positive cohort.