1. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation? Not really!
- Author
-
Guerram, H.
- Abstract
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is considered as first line therapy for patient with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF). Recurrent event rate is estimated to be 31% during an average of 5 years follow-up. Careful analysis of ICD EGM. A 42-year old man with past history of IVF and ICD implantation, presented to the emergency department for syncope while walking followed by an electrical shock from his ICD. The 12-lead ECG, the cerebral scan and the blood sample were normal. The interrogation of the defibrillator (dual chamber, BOSTON) showed that the device was programmed in RYTHMIC algorithm (AAIR–ADIR 80–120 bm). The syncope was related to a ventricular fibrillation (VF) stopped by electrical shock. We can see (Fig. 1) a premature ventricular contraction (PVC) that happens in the ventricular noise window and marked in brackets [VS] like ventricular sense. Ventricular noise window represents the last 40 ms of nominal 65 ms of ventricular blanking after atrial pacing. When an event is sensed in the noise portion of a blanking window, event is not used for timing or detection, which explains that the VVI backup pacing occurs on T-wave initiating VF. Initiation of VF with pacing on T-wave is a rare event with a few reported cases in the literature. Despite the high risk of ventricular arrythmia among people with IVF, this case shows that VF can unfortunately be provoked by the ICD itself. In our example a PVC occurring during the noise window iniates the VF by pacing on T-wave. After introducing Verapamil PVCs has diseappeared and no further arrhythmia has been noticed till now. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF