Search

Background: In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) - venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted.Study Design: The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke.Conclusions: The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The impact of coronary artery chronic total occlusion (CTO) and its management with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI) related cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear.Methods: This is a pre-specified analysis from the culprit-lesion-only PCI vs multivessel PCI in CS (CULPRIT-SHOCK) trial which randomized patients presenting with MI and multivessel disease complicated by CS to a culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI strategy. CTO was defined by central core-laboratory evaluation. The independent associations between the presence of CTO and adverse outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were assessed using multivariate logistics models.Results: A noninfarct related CTO was present in 157 of 667 (23.5%) analyzed patients. Patients presenting with CTO had more frequent diabetes mellitus or prior PCI but less frequently presented with ST segment elevation MI as index event. The presence of CTO was associated with higher rate of death at 30 days (adjusted Odds ratio 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.60). Rate of death at 1 year was also increased but did not reach statistical significance (adjusted Odds ratio 1.62; 95%CI 0.99-2.66). Compare to immediate multivessel PCI, a strategy of culprit-lesion-only PCI was associated with lower rates of death or renal replacement therapy at 30 days in patients with and without CTO (Odds ratio 0.79 95%CI 0.42-1.49 and Odds ratio 0.67 95%CI 0.48-0.96, respectively), without significant interaction (P = .68).Conclusions: In patients with MI-related CS and multivessel disease, the presence of CTO is associated with adverse outcomes while a strategy of culprit-lesion-only PCI seems beneficial regardless of the presence of CTO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use and impact of transradial artery access (TRA) compared to transfemoral artery access (TFA) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remain unclear.Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial where patients presenting with MI and multivessel disease complicated by CS were randomized to a strategy of culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI. Arterial access was left at operator's discretion. Adjudicated outcomes of interest were the composite of death or renal replacement therapy (RRT) at 30 days and 1 year. Multivariate logistic models were used to assess the association between the arterial access and outcomes.Results: Among the 673 analyzed patients, TRA and TFA were successfully performed in 118 (17.5%) and 555 (82.5%) patients, respectively. Compared to TFA, TRA was associated with a lower 30-day rate of death or RRT (37.3% vs 53.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.96), a lower 30-day rate of death (34.7% vs 49.7%; aOR: 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.96), and a lower 30-day rate of RRT (5.9% vs 15.9%; aOR: 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.97). No significant differences were observed regarding the 30-day risks of type 3 or 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding and stroke. The observed reduction of death or RRT and death with TRA was no longer significant at 1 year (44.9% vs 57.8%; aOR: 0.85; 95% CI 0.50-1.45 and 42.4% vs 55.5%, aOR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.46-1.32, respectively).Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCI for acute MI complicated by CS, TRA may be associated with improved early outcomes, although the reason for this finding needs further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background--Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently observed in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and associated with worse clinical outcome. However, the mechanisms for this increased risk are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of the presence of AF to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived myocardial salvage and damage as well as clinical outcomes. Methods and Results--This multicenter CMR study enrolled 786 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. CMR parameters (infarct size, myocardial salvage index, microvascular obstruction, and myocardial function) were assessed 3 (interquartile range [IQR], 2-4) days post-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and compared between patients with or without AF during hospitalization. Major adverse cardiac events were assessed as a composite of allcause death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure at 12 months. AF was documented in 48 (6.1%) patients. There was no significant difference in infarct size (18 [IQR, 9-29]% versus 17 [IQR, 9-25]% of left ventricular mass; P=0.340), myocardial salvage index (51 [IQR, 34-69] versus 51 [IQR, 33-69]; P=0.830), or microvascular obstruction (0.6 [IQR, 0-2.0]% versus 0.0 [IQR, 0-1.8]% of left ventricular mass; P=0.340) between groups. Patients with AF had significantly lower left ventricular (47 [IQR, 34-54]% versus 51 [IQR, 44-58]%; P=0.003) and left atrial (42 [IQR, 17-57]% versus 53 [IQR, 45-59]%; P<0.001) ejection fraction. AF was associated with major adverse cardiac events, even when adjusting for clinical risk factors (odds ratio, 2.48 [95% confidence interval, 1.22-5.03]; P=0.0120) or CMR prognosis markers (odds ratio, 3.77 [95% confidence interval, 1.83-7.79]; P=0.001). Conclusions--This CMR study found no major differences in myocardial salvage, infarct size, or microvascular damage in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction or without AF. AF was, however, associated with cardiac dysfunction and independently related to major adverse cardiac events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background--Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) demonstrated great potential for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a CMR-based risk score for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Methods and Results--The scoring model was developed and validated on ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction cohorts from 2 independent randomized controlled trials (n=738 and n=458 patients, respectively) and included left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, infarct size, and microvascular obstruction. Primary end point was the 12-month MACE rate consisting of death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure. In the derivation cohort, LV ejection fraction ≤7%, infarct size ≥19%LV, and microvascular obstruction ≥1.4%LV were identified as the best cutoff values for MACE prediction. According to the hazard ratios in multivariable regression analysis, the CMR risk score was created by attributing 1 point for LV ejection fraction ≤47%, 1 point for infarct size ≥19%LV, and 2 points for microvascular obstruction ≥1.4%LV In the validation cohort, the score showed a good prediction of MACE (area under the curve: 0.76). Stratification into a low (0/1 point) and high-risk group (≥2 points) resulted in significantly higher MACE rates in high-risk patients (9.0% versus 2.2%; P=0.001). Inclusion of the CMR score in addition to a model of clinical risk factors led to a significant increase of C statistics from 0.74 to 0.83 (P=0.037), a net reclassification improvement of 0.18 (P=0.009), and an integrated discriminative improvement of 0.04 (P=0.010). Conclusions--Our approach integrates the prognostic information of CMR imaging into a simple risk score that showed incremental prognostic value over clinical risk factors in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Clinical Trial Registration--URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00712101 and NCT02158468. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) immediately after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is essential to guide further intervention in cases of relevant AR. It was the aim of this study to identify a simple and reproducible hemodynamic parameter for the assessment of AR. Background Relevant AR after TAVR is present in up to 21% of cases and might be associated with adverse long-term outcomes. Methods Three hundred sixty-two consecutive patients who were treated with TAVR for symptomatic aortic valve stenosis were analyzed. AR was assessed by aortic root angiography according to the Sellers classification. For hemodynamic evaluation, the diastolic pressure-time (DPT) index was calculated after TAVR: the area between the aortic and left ventricular pressure-time curves was measured during diastole and divided by the duration of diastole to calculate the DPT index. The DPT index was finally adjusted for the respective systolic blood pressure: DPT index adj = (DPT index/systolic blood pressure) × 100. Results Patients with angiographically nonrelevant AR (grade <2) had higher DPT index adj (30.7 ± 6.8) compared with those with relevant AR (grade ≥2) (26.2 ± 5.8) (p < 0.05). Patients with DPT index adj ≤27.9 had significantly higher 1-year mortality risk in comparison with those with DPT index adj >27.9: 41.4% versus 13.5% (hazard ratio: 3.8; 95% confidence interval: 2.4 to 5.9; p [log rank-test] < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, DPT index adj ≤27.9 was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 2.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.8 to 3.7; p < 0.001). Conclusions DPT index adj is a simple, investigator-independent parameter that should be considered to differentiate between relevant and nonrelevant AR after TAVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), up to 80% of patients present with multivessel coronary artery disease. Currently, the best revascularization strategy is unknown. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted.Study Design: The CULPRIT-SHOCK study is a 706-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with possible staged non-culprit lesion revascularization versus immediate multivessel PCI in patients with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of CULPRIT-SHOCK is 30-day mortality and severe renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, an intermediate- and long-term follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed. Safety endpoints include the assessment of bleeding and stroke.Conclusions: The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial will address the question of optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The aim of this study was to examine whether manual thrombus aspiration reduces microvascular obstruction assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting late after symptom onset. Background Thrombus aspiration is an established treatment option in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there are only limited data on the efficacy of thrombus aspiration in patients with STEMI presenting ≥12 h after symptom onset. Methods Patients with subacute STEMI presenting ≥12 and ≤48 h after symptom onset were randomized to primary PCI with or without manual thrombus aspiration in a 1:1 ratio. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 1 to 4 days after randomization. The primary endpoint was the extent of microvascular obstruction. Results A total of 152 patients underwent randomization. The mean time between symptom onset and PCI was 28 ± 12 h. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The majority of patients (60%) showed at least a moderate amount of viable myocardium in the affected region. Extent of microvascular obstruction was not significantly different between patients assigned to thrombus aspiration and the control group (2.5 ± 4.0% vs. 3.1 ± 4.4% of left ventricular mass, p = 0.47). There were also no significant differences in infarct size, myocardial salvage, left ventricular ejection fraction, and angiographic and clinical endpoints between groups. Conclusions In this first randomized trial of thrombectomy in patients with STEMI presenting late after symptom onset, routine thrombus aspiration before PCI failed to show a benefit for markers of reperfusion success. (Effect of Thrombus Aspiration in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Presenting Late After Symptom Onset; NCT01379248 ) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The aim of this analysis was to assess the 7-year long-term safety and effectiveness of a randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery for the treatment of isolated proximal left anterior descending lesions. Background Long-term follow-up data comparing PCI by SES and MIDCAB surgery for isolated proximal left anterior descending lesions are sparse. Methods Patients were randomized either to PCI with SES (n = 65) or MIDCAB (n = 65). Follow-up data were obtained after 7 years with respect to the primary composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Angina was assessed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification and quality of life with Short Form 36 and MacNew quality of life questionnaires. Results Follow-up was conducted in 129 patients at a median time of 7.3 years (interquartile range: 5.7, 8.3). There were no significant differences in the incidence of the primary composite endpoint between groups (22% PCI vs. 12% MIDCAB; p = 0.17) or the endpoints death (14% vs. 17%; p = 0.81) and myocardial infarction (6% vs. 9%, p = 0.74). However, the target vessel revascularization rate was higher in the PCI group (20% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.001). Clinical symptoms and quality of life improved significantly from baseline with both interventions and were similar in magnitude between groups. Conclusions At 7-year follow-up, PCI by SES and MIDCAB in isolated proximal left anterior descending lesions yielded similar long-term outcomes regarding the primary composite clinical endpoint and quality of life. Target vessel revascularization was more frequent in the PCI group. (MIDCAB Versus DES in Proximal LAD Lesions; NCT00299429 ) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to assess the 10-year long-term safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) for the treatment of proximal left anterior descending (LAD) lesions. Background: Long-term follow-up data comparing PCI and MIDCAB surgery for isolated proximal LAD lesions are sparse. Methods: Patients with significant isolated proximal LAD stenoses were randomized either to PCI with bare-metal stents (n = 110) or MIDCAB (n = 110). At 10 years, data were obtained with respect to the primary endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization). Angina was assessed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification. Results: Follow-up was conducted for 212 patients at a median time of 10.3 years. There were no significant differences in the binary primary composite endpoint (47% vs. 36%; p = 0.12) and hard endpoints (death and infarction) between PCI and MIDCAB. However, a higher target vessel revascularization rate in the PCI group (34% vs. 11%; p < 0.01) was observed. Clinical symptoms improved significantly from baseline and were similar between both treatment groups. Conclusions: At 10-year follow-up, PCI and MIDCAB in isolated proximal LAD lesions yielded similar long-term outcomes regarding the primary composite clinical endpoint. Target vessel revascularization was more frequent in the PCI group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports on the study that determines the relationship of diabetes mellitus status and hyperglycemia on myocardial damage. It shows that the higher mortality rate in diabetic versus nondiabetic ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is not explained by more pronounced myocardial damage. It indicates that hyperglycemia on admission is associated with greater myocardial injury and in increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.

Background: Circulating microRNAs (miRs) have emerged as potential diagnostic markers in patients with myocardial infarction. Previous studies, however, were based on limited patient numbers and could not assess the relation of miRs to myocardial damage. Moreover, the prognostic value of miRs in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the relation between miR-133a and myocardial damage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and (2) to evaluate the prognostic value of miR-133a in reperfused STEMI. Methods: MicroRNA-133a concentrations were determined in 216 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty less than 12 hours after symptom onset. Patients were categorized into 2 groups defined by the median miR-133a value on admission. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was performed for assessment of infarct size, myocardial salvage, and microvascular obstruction. The primary clinical end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events defined as a composite of death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure within 6 months after infarction. Results: All prognostic relevant CMR markers (infarct size, microvascular obstruction, myocardial salvage index) showed significant correlations with circulating miR-133a concentrations (P < .001 for all).The strongest predictors of miR-133a concentrations were the time from symptom onset to reperfusion and the amount of the salvaged area at risk. Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred significantly more often in the miR-133a ≥ median group (9% vs 20%, P = .025). However, miR-133a concentrations were unable to independently predict clinical events. Conclusions: Elevated levels of circulating miR-133a in patients with STEMI are associated with decreased myocardial salvage, larger infarcts, and more pronounced reperfusion injury. Consequently, miR-133a concentrations can provide prognostic information but do not add independent prognostic information to traditional and CMR markers of clinical prognosis in a high-risk STEMI population. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: In current guidelines, intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) is considered a class 1 indication in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. However, evidence is mainly based on retrospective or prospective registries with a lack of randomized clinical trials. Therefore, IABP is currently only used in 20% to 40% of cardiogenic shock cases. The hypothesis of this trial is that IABP in addition to early revascularization by either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting will improve clinical outcome of patients in cardiogenic shock. Study Design: The IABP-SHOCK II study is a 600-patient, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of IABP versus optimal medical therapy on the background of early revascularization by either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to 1 of the 2 treatments. The primary efficacy end point of IABP-SHOCK II is 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures, such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters, will serve as surrogate end points for prognosis. Furthermore, an intermediate and long-term follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed. Safety will be assessed, by the GUSTO bleeding definition, peripheral ischemic complications, sepsis, and stroke. Conclusions: The IABP-SHOCK II trial addresses important questions regarding the efficacy and safety of IABP in addition to early revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) compared with endomyocardial biopsy in patients with suspected acute myocarditis (AMC) and chronic myocarditis (CMC). Background: Several studies have reported an encouraging diagnostic performance of CMR in myocarditis. However, the comparison of CMR with clinical data only and the use of preselected patient populations are important limitations of the majority of these reports. Methods: One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with suspected AMC (defined by symptoms ≤14 days; n = 70) and CMC (defined by symptoms >14 days; n = 62) were included. Patients underwent cardiac catheterization with left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy and CMR, including T2-weighted imaging for assessment of edema, T1-weighted imaging before and after contrast administration for evaluation of hyperemia, and assessment of late gadolinium enhancement. CMR results were considered to be consistent with the diagnosis of myocarditis if 2 of 3 CMR techniques were positive. Results: Within the total population, myocarditis was the most common diagnosis on endomyocardial biopsy analysis (62.9%). Viral genomes were detected in 30.3% (40 of 132) of patients within the total patient population and significantly more often in patients with AMC than CMC (40.0% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.013). For the overall cohort of patients with either suspected AMC or CMC, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CMR were 76%, 54%, and 68%, respectively. The best diagnostic performance was observed in patients with suspected AMC (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 71%; and accuracy, 79%). In contrast, diagnostic performance of CMR in suspected CMC was found to be unsatisfactory (sensitivity, 63%; specificity, 40%; and accuracy, 52%). Conclusions: The results of this study underline the usefulness of CMR in patients with suspected AMC. In contrast, the diagnostic performance of CMR in patients with suspected CMC might not be sufficient to guide clinical management. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article presents a study on the sex-associated differences in infarct characteristics and clinical outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who are reperfused by primary angioplasty. The researchers performed coronary angiography of the target lesion before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). They found that the efficacy of primary PCI in STEMI patients is not sex-dependent.

Objectives: This study investigated the impact of sheath size on the rate of radial artery occlusions (RAO) (primary objective) and other access site complications (hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula) as secondary objectives after transradial coronary catheterization. Background: The number of vascular access complications in the published data ranges from 5% to 38% after transradial catheterization. Methods: Between November 2009 and August 2010, 455 patients 65.3 ± 10.9 years of age (62.2% male) with transradial access with 5-F (n = 153) or 6-F (n = 302) arterial sheaths were prospectively recruited. Duplex sonography was obtained in each patient before discharge. Patients with symptomatic RAO were treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and a follow-up was performed. Results: The incidence of access site complications was 14.4% with 5-F sheaths compared with 33.1% with 6-F sheaths (p < 0.001). Radial artery occlusion occurred in 13.7% with 5-F sheaths compared with 30.5% with 6-F sheaths (p < 0.001). There was no difference between groups with regard to hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysms, or arteriovenous fistulas. Female sex, larger sheath size, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, and younger age independently predicted RAO in multivariate analysis. In total, 42.5% of patients with RAO were immediately symptomatic; another 7% became symptomatic within a mean of 4 days. Of patients with RAO, 59% were treated with LMWH. The recanalization rates were significantly higher in patients receiving LMWH compared with conventional therapy (55.6% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001) after a mean of 14 days. Conclusions: The incidence of RAO by vascular ultrasound was higher than expected from previous data, especially in patients who underwent the procedure with larger sheaths. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the area at risk (AAR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with 2 different cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging methods and to compare them with the validated angiographic Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease Score (APPROACH-score) in a large consecutive patient cohort. Background: Edema imaging with T2-weighted CMR and the endocardial surface area (ESA) assessed by late gadolinium enhancement have been introduced as relatively new methods for AAR assessment in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, data on the utility and validation of these techniques are limited. Methods: A total of 197 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were included. AAR (assessed with T2-weighted edema imaging and the ESA method), infarct size, and myocardial salvage (AAR minus infarct size) were determined by CMR 2 to 4 days after primary angioplasty. Angiographic AAR scoring was performed by use of the APPROACH-score. All measurements were done offline by blinded observers. Results: The AAR assessed by T2-weighted imaging showed good correlation with the angiographic AAR (r = 0.87; p < 0.001), whereas the ESA showed only a moderate correlation either to T2-weighted imaging (r = 0.56; p < 0.001) or the APPROACH-score (r = 0.44; p < 0.001). Mean AAR by ESA (20.0 ± 11.7% of left ventricular mass) was significantly (p < 0.001) smaller than the AAR assessed by T2-weighted imaging (35.6 ± 10.9% of left ventricular mass) or the APPROACH-score (27.9 ± 10.5% of left ventricular mass) and showed a significant negative dependence on myocardial salvage index. In contrast, no dependence of T2-weighted edema imaging or the APPROACH-score on myocardial salvage index was seen. Conclusions: The AAR can be reliably assessed by T2-weighted CMR, whereas assessment of the AAR by ESA seems to be dependent on the degree of myocardial salvage, thereby underestimating the AAR in patients with high myocardial salvage such as aborted infarction. Thus, assessment of the AAR with the ESA method cannot be recommended. (Myocardial Salvage and Contrast Dye Induced Nephropathy Reduction by N-Acetylcystein [LIPSIA-N-ACC]; NCT00463749) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: No-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with poor prognosis. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor that might aggravate reperfusion injury. The aim of our study was to assess the relationship between systemic ET-1 levels and the occurrence of no-reflow as well as to evaluate the prognostic value of ET-1 in a high-risk STEMI population. Methods: We examined 128 consecutive patients undergoing primary PCI in acute STEMI <12 hours after symptom onset. Endothelin-1 was assessed before and immediately after primary PCI. Patients were categorized into 2 groups defined by the median ET-1 level on admission. No-reflow was assessed by 3 different methods after PCI: angiographic Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow and myocardial blush grade, electrocardiographic ST-resolution, and microvascular obstruction (MO) measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary clinical end points were mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. Clinical follow-up was conducted after a median of 19 months. Results: Patients with angiographically (TIMI flow ≤2 or TIMI flow 3 with final myocardial bush grade ≤2 after PCI), electrocardiographically (ST-resolution <30%), and MRI- (presence of MO) detected no-reflow had significantly higher ET-1 levels on admission. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, ET-1 levels on admission were the only significant predictor of MRI-detected no-reflow (P = .03) together with left ventricular ejection fraction (P = .002). An elevated ET-1 level ≥ the median on admission was a significant predictor of long-term mortality. Conclusions: Endothelin-1 on admission is associated with no-reflow and increased long-term mortality in a high-risk STEMI population reperfused by primary PCI. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Aborted myocardial infarction (MI) is defined by major (≥50%) ST-segment resolution and a lack of subsequent cardiac enzyme rise ≥2 the upper normal limit. This ultimate myocardial salvage has been observed in approximately 15% of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients after fibrinolysis. So far, the prognostic significance and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of an aborted MI after primary angioplasty have not been evaluated appropriately. Methods: We examined 420 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty within 12 hours after symptom onset. All patients underwent MRI within 1 to 4 days. Clinical end points were major adverse cardiovascular events within 6 months after the index event. Results: Of the 420 STEMI patients, 58 (14%) fulfilled aborted MI criteria. As compared with true MI, patients with aborted MI had a significant lower infarct size, shorter pain-to-balloon time, and better left ventricular ejection fraction (P < .001, respectively). Aborted MI patients had a 6-month major adverse cardiovascular event rate of 1.7% versus 19.6% of true MI patients (P = .001). In aborted MI patients, MRI detected no myocardial scar in 30 (56%), and a minor necrosis/scar formation in 24 patients (44%). Conclusion: The proven prognostic relevance of aborted MI makes it a meaningful end point and therapeutic target in future MI studies. MRI can further distinguish between true aborted MI with absence of myocardial scar and aborted MI with scar formations. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is highly complex, and outcomes may depend on the time of hospital admission and subsequent intervention (ie, ON-hours versus OFF-hours). The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) demonstrated superior outcome for culprit-lesion-only versus immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, multivessel disease, and cardiogenic shock. However, it is unknown whether the time of hospital admission affects the overall outcome of these high-risk patients. Methods: We analyzed patients from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial with respect to the time of hospital admission. We divided patients in ON-hours and OFF-hours groups and further stratified them according to their individual revascularization strategy. Outcome measures consisted of a composite end point of death or renal-replacement therapy within 30 days and mortality within 1 year. Results: Out of 686 patients randomized in the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, 444 patients (64.7%) presented during ON-hours, whereas 242 patients (35.3%) presented during OFF-hours. Death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days occurred to a similar extent in patients admitted during ON-hours (51.0%) and OFF-hours (50.0%; P =0.80). Similarly, 1-year mortality was not affected by the time of hospital admission (54.4% ON-hours versus 51.7% OFF-hours, P =0.49). Regardless of admission time, patients had a benefit from culprit-lesion-only as compared to immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. The composite end point at 30 days occurred in 45.1% versus 57.6% of patients admitted ON-hours and in 47.7% versus 51.9% of patients admitted OFF-hours (P interaction=0.29). Death within 1 year occurred in 49.4% versus 60.0% of patients admitted during ON-hours and in 51.4% versus 51.9% of patients admitted OFF-hours (P interaction=0.20). Conclusions: Among patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, the risk of death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days, and mortality at 1 year did not differ significantly according to the time of hospital admission. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01927549. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Women are more likely to suffer and die from cardiogenic shock (CS) as the most severe complication of acute myocardial infarction. Data concerning optimal management for women with CS are scarce. Aim of this study was to better define characteristics of women experiencing CS and to the influence of sex on different treatment strategies. Methods: In the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial (The Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock), patients with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to one of the following revascularization strategies: either percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Primary end point was composite of death from any cause or severe renal failure leading to renal replacement therapy within 30 days. We investigated sex-specific differences in general and according to the revascularization strategies. Results: Among all 686 randomized patients included in the analysis, 24% were women. Women were older and had more often diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency, whereas they had less often history of previous acute myocardial infarction and smoking. After 30 days, the primary clinical end point was not significantly different between groups (56% women versus 49% men; odds ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.91–1.84]; P =0.15). There was no interaction between sex and coronary revascularization strategy regarding mortality and renal failure (P interaction=0.11). The primary end point occurred in 56% of women treated by the culprit-lesion-only strategy versus 42% men, whereas 55% of women and 55% of men in the multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention group. Conclusions: Although women presented with a different risk profile, mortality and renal replacement were similar to men. Sex did not influence mortality and renal failure according to the different coronary revascularization strategies. Based on these data, women and men presenting with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease should not be treated differently. However, further randomized trials powered to address potential sex-specific differences in CS are still necessary. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01927549. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: It is unclear whether atrial fibrillation (AF) influences prognosis in patients with cardiogenic shock and multivessel disease. We aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of AF in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results: In a subanalysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial (Culprit Lesion Only PCI versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock), patients were grouped according to the presence of AF during index hospital stay. The primary end point was all-cause death at 30 days, and the key secondary end point was all-cause death at 1 year. AF was documented in 142 (21%) of 686 patients. AF was not a significant predictor of 30-day (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI 0.67–1.54; P =0.95) and 1-year (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.52–1.22; P =0.30) all-cause mortality. Patients with AF already on admission showed higher all-cause mortality at 30 days (52 of 90, 58% versus 19 of 52, 37%; P =0.02) and 1 year (57 of 90, 63% versus 20 of 52, 39%; P =0.004) compared with patients with newly detected AF during hospital stay. AF was associated with a longer time to hemodynamic stabilization (4, interquartile range, 1–8 days versus 3, interquartile range, 1–6 days; P =0.04) at 30 days. Conclusions: In cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality is similar in patients with and without AF. Adverse outcome was detected in the subgroup of patients showing AF already on hospital admission. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01927549. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]