Search

Wound healing evaluation methods in a third-degree burn injury model are categorized as histological (re-epithelialization and granulation tissue formation) and molecular (quantitative polymerase chain reaction). In general, mRNA expression is normalized to those of the housekeeping gene. Although the housekeeping gene expression is generally stable, it has been reported that the stability of these genes depends on the wound healing process and treatment method. In this study, we identified the most stable housekeeping gene (TATA-binding protein) for studying gene expression in a third-degree burn injury model, in which wound healing was promoted by grafting human amnion-derived mesenchymal cells. We investigated the wound healing effect of human amnion-derived mesenchymal cells in the injury model. The formation of granulation tissue, the differentiation from fibroblasts to myofibroblasts, and functional vascular structure were promoted in the full-thickness skin excision site by treatment with these cells. The expression of angiogenic, pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory related mRNA was measured and normalized to that of the housekeeping gene, showing that treatment with the cells promoted the infiltration of endothelial cells and differentiation of M1 and M2 macrophages. In conclusion, wound healing in a third-degree burn injury model can be accurately analyzed using the optimized housekeeping gene.

Background: The top-down holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique recently emerged as a safe and effective modification of traditional HoLEP. In our randomized controlled trial, we compared intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of traditional and top-down HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with a prostate size ≥80 g. Methods: One-hundred patients with BPH and a prostate volume ≥80 cc participated in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Outcome measures were collected and compared, including IPSS, QoL, flow rate, PVR, IIEF-15, PSA, and TRUS prostate volume changes. Perioperative complications were also recorded. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: There were no significant differences in preoperative baseline characteristics between the two surgical groups. The median prostate volume for the traditional and top-down HoLEP groups was 107 and 102 cc, respectively. The operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were comparable for both cohorts. The median enucleation time for traditional HoLEP was 60 min, which was not significantly longer than that of top-down HoLEP (52 min) (p= 0.07). At 3 months follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in transient stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in the traditional HoLEP (4.1%) versus the top-down HoLEP group (2.2%), (p= 0.61). There were no significant differences in functional and sexual outcomes between the two groups at 12 months. Conclusions: The HoLEP procedure significantly improves patients’ urinary functional outcomes and has comparable postoperative outcomes regardless of the technique utilized.