Search

Abstract: The Reflection uncemented acetabular component (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tenn) for total hip arthroplasty is available in 2 geometric variants. The first has a completely hemispherical design; the second has a peripheral rim expansion designed to increase initial press fit and aid osseointegration. The clinical and radiologic outcomes of 527 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties were reviewed to investigate the differences in component design. Of the components, 95.6% survived at 96 months with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point, with no significant difference between the 2 component designs. Eighty percent of hemispherical and 57% of peripherally expanded components were considered completely osseointegrated at final radiologic review. The midterm radiologic outcome of peripherally expanded acetabular components is inferior to that of a completely hemispherical design. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Physeal fractures account for approximately one third of all childhood fractures. Growth arrest is a serious complication of these injuries which, if not managed correctly, can lead to angular deformity, limb length discrepancy, or both. This in turn may cause pain, loss of function and disability. The article reviews the evaluation of a child with suspected traumatic physeal growth arrest including patient history, physical examination and imaging strategies for the early detection of physeal growth arrest and measurement of limb length discrepancy. Various anatomical classifications of physeal growth arrest are also presented. Finally, we discuss an approach to the management of a child with confirmed traumatic physeal growth arrest depending on the nature of the arrest and limb deformity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To compare postoperative range of motion (ROM) and function in a randomized prospective trial of Swanson and NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint implants. Methods: A total of 33 patients who had rheumatoid arthritis underwent primary MCP arthroplasty of all 4 fingers in 40 hands; 20 received Swanson implants and 20 received NeuFlex implants. Exclusion criteria included diagnosis of other connective tissue disorders and previous MCP joint surgery. All participants followed the same postoperative rehabilitation protocol. The primary outcome measure was active MCP flexion. Secondary outcomes included active MCP extension, arc of motion, ulnar drift, function (Jamar grip strength and Sollerman hand function test), and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Patients were assessed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Patients'' mean age was 62.5 years (Swanson) and 58.1 years (NeuFlex) (p = .03). A total of 19 of 20 hands (Swanson) and 14 of 20 hands (NeuFlex) were from female patients. Preoperative active ROM was not significantly different. At follow-up, both groups demonstrated increased active extension and arc of motion (p < .001), reduced active flexion and improved ulnar deviation (p < .001), increased mean Sollerman and Michigan Hand Questionnaire domain scores (p < .001), and improved grip strength (p = .03). Active MCP flexion was significantly greater in all 4 digits of hands with NeuFlex implants compared with Swanson implants. The NeuFlex group demonstrated a greater total arc of motion in the little finger. Implant groups were not significantly different by individual digit for active MCP extension, ulnar drift, and composite flexion. Functional outcomes did not differ between groups. Patients with Swanson implants reported higher Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores in the function and aesthetics domains. Conclusions: Both implant groups obtained satisfactory clinical improvement after MCP reconstruction of the hand. The NeuFlex group demonstrated superior ROM, whereas the Swanson group had better self-reported function and aesthetics, but not objectively measured function. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic I. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To determine patient motivations for surgery and satisfaction with outcomes for metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty in 3 domains (appearance, function, and pain) and whether patient-reported satisfaction correlates with standard outcome measures. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial of MCP joint implants, 33 patients with rheumatoid arthritis had primary MCP joint arthroplasty: 15 hands received Swanson implants, and 18 received NeuFlex implants. Range of motion, ulnar drift, grip strength, Sollerman hand function test, and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire were collected before surgery and 1 year after surgery. Preoperative patient motivations for and expectations of MCP joint arthroplasty were assessed for function, pain, and appearance. Patient-perceived improvement and satisfaction within the 3 domains and global satisfaction were assessed after surgery. Results: Function was rated the most important motivator for surgery by 31 patients, pain by 22, and appearance by 15. Twenty-six patients rated 2 or more motivators equally high. Michigan Hand Questionnaire subscores were moderately correlated or weakly correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. The Sollerman score was weakly correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. Range of motion, ulnar drift, and grip strength were not correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. More patients stated that a much better improvement was obtained for appearance than for function or pain relief. Conclusions: Patient expectations of MCP joint arthroplasty were uniformly high. The greatest motivation for surgery was functional improvement. Pain was highly ranked, and 25 patients rated hand appearance as the first or second motivator. Patient satisfaction correlated poorly with traditional outcome measures and moderately with patient-reported outcomes. We conclude that appearance should be considered an important motivator for surgery and determinant of satisfaction. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic I. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]