Search

European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) recommends managing appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours (aNET) with appendicectomy and possibly completion right hemicolectomy (CRH). However, disease behaviour and survival patterns remain uncertain. We retrospectively assessed the impact of lymph nodes and CRH on outcomes, including survival, in all aNET patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2016. 102 patients (52F, 50 M), median age 39.4 (range 16.3–81.1) years, were diagnosed with aNET. Mean tumour size was 12.7 (range 1–60) mm, most sited in appendiceal tip (63%). Index surgery was appendicectomy in 79% of cases while the remainder underwent colectomy. CRH performed in 30 patients at a median 3.2 (range 1.4–9.8) months post-index surgery yielded residual disease in nine: lymph nodes (n = 8) or residual tumour (n = 1). Univariate logistic regression showed residual disease was significantly predicted by tumour size ≥2 cm (p = 0.020). Four patients declined CRH, but did not suffer relapse or reduced survival. One patient developed recurrence after 16.5 years of follow-up and another patient developed a second neuroendocrine tumour after 18.8 years follow-up. There were 5 deaths; one being aNET-related. 5-year and 10-year overall survival were 99% and 92% respectively; 5-year and 10-year relapse-free survival were 98% and 92% respectively. Only 5-year relapse-free survival was affected by ENETS stage (p = 0.002). aNETs are indolent with very high rates of overall and relapse-free survival. Recurrence is rare, and in this series only occurred decades later, making a compelling case for selective surveillance and follow-up. The significance of positive lymph nodes and the necessity for completion right hemicolectomy remain unclear. • Appendiceal NETs have a very good prognosis. • The prognostic impact of positive lymph is uncertain. • Recurrence is rare and occurs decades later mandating selective surveillance and follow-up. • The necessity for completion right hemicolectomy remain unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An update on the management of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is provided in the present article for those interested in the UEMS/EBSQ exam in Surgical Oncology. The most recent publications in HCC, including surveillance, guidelines, and indications for liver resection, liver transplantation, and locoregional or systemic therapies, are summarised. The objective is to yield a set of main points regarding HCC that are required in the core curriculum of hepatobiliary oncological surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Liver transplantation in patients with unresectable early-stage (<3 cm, node negative) hilar cholangiocarcinoma has been recently reported to be associated with longer survival compared to liver resection and therefore suggested as potential treatment option also in resectable disease. Here, we investigated the outcome of resection in early-stage tumours as the standard of care in an experienced European centre. Methods Patients with de novo resectable hilar cholangiocarcinomas who underwent liver resection between mid-2009 and December 2017 were classified as early-stage (<3 cm and node negative) or later-stage tumours (≥3 cm and/or node positive), and were investigated with respect to clinical outcome. Results Fifty-six patients were analyzed of whom 17 had early-stage tumours and 39 had later-stage tumours. The sex ratio (m:f) was 30:26. The median age was 65 years (range 33–80). The median follow-up was 17.0 months (range 0.7–92.4). 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 82% in patients with early-stage tumours and 23% in patients with later-stage tumours, respectively. Median OS was 89.9 months and 27.6 months, respectively (HR 0.25 (95% CI 0.08–0.84), P = 0.024). Conclusions In an experienced European centre, 5-year survival rates after liver resection for early-stage hilar cholangiocarcinoma are comparable with reported outcomes after transplantation. The results of this study question the value of liver transplantation in this setting, especially with respect to the shortage of transplantable organs worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) seems to be altered when the primary tumour is right-sided. However, data are lacking and conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the influence of the primary tumour location on oncologic outcomes following such surgery. Methods We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data from 376 consecutive patients who underwent liver surgery for CLM between June 2010 and August 2015. We compared the outcomes of patients with right colon tumours and those with left colorectal tumours. The splenic flexure was used as the cut-off point to determine the anatomic primary site. Results Among the 364 patients eligible, 74 (20.3%) had a right-sided primary tumour. These patients were older, had a poorer American Society of Anaesthesiologists status and had fewer node-positive primary tumours. The CLM characteristics were similar between both groups. Median PFS was not significantly different between the two groups at 9.9 months, as well as the pattern of recurrence. Median OS was shorter for patients with right-sided primary tumour (34.6 versus 45.3 months, p = 0.035). Similar results were observed when patients with rectal tumour were excluded from analysis (34.6 vs. 47.5 months, p = 0.007). Primary tumour site was an independent prognosis factor in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Right-sided location of the primary tumour is associated with worse OS after surgery for CLM, but seems to have no influence on PFS, and on the pattern of recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Liver-limited recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases is a frequent occurrence, and can in some cases be treated with curative intent. Although surgical re-resection remains standard of care, there is growing interest in the role of ablation in this setting. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes after curative-intent ablation and resection in patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases. Methods We retrospectively analysed data from 366 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases between June 2010 and August 2015. Sixty-four developed liver-limited recurrence which was treated with curative intent, thirty-three (51.6%) by ablation and 31 (48.4%) by repeat resection. Results Patient groups were well matched, with surgically resected patients showing higher pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and larger metastases. There were fewer post-operative complications and shorter length of stay in the ablation group (p < 0.02). After a median follow-up of 36.2 months, median overall survival was the same for both the resected and ablated groups at 33.3 months. Median progression-free survival was longer for patients treated with surgery (10.2 months) compared to ablation (4.3 months) (p = 0.002). Conclusions Ablation or resection for liver-limited recurrence after surgery for colorectal liver metastases is associated with improved overall survival compared with systemic chemotherapy alone, and should always be considered for patients with resectable liver recurrence. Although ablation seemed to be associated with a shorter progression-free survival, post-procedure morbidity was significantly lower. The choice between ablation and resection should therefore be made on a personalised basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B Background: b Resection margin and node status are known prognosticators in patients who undergo resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. B Materials and Methods b : Patients with resected de novo hilar cholangiocarcinoma from two European hepatobiliary centres (Medical University of Vienna and Aintree University Hospital, 2006-2016) were classified according to resection margin status (all negative, surgically positive, circumferentially positive) and investigated with respect to overall survival (OS). Forty-three (44%) patients had negative resection margins, 32 (33%) had a positive circumferential margin and 23 (23%) had a positive surgical margin. [Extracted from the article]