Search

The increase in statin use, since their introduction, has been rapid and the broadening of indications has occurred seemingly without restriction. Once established on statin therapy, there is sparse research on discontinuation. Trials do not often address benefit in later life, or the impact of a life-limiting diagnosis. Data on primary prevention suggest that 100 patients need treatment for 2.5 years to prevent one major adverse cardiovascular event. Acknowledging this, we sought to determine the use of statins in a cohort of older adults with cancer, to highlight prevalence, and suggest a role for deprescribing. Data were retrospectively collected from a prospectively maintained database of patients attending a single centre Geriatric Oncology clinic. Data collected included sex, age, cancer type and stage, systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) recommendation, comorbidities, non-SACT medications, and overall survival. For those receiving statin therapy, data were separated into primary prevention and stage IV cancer. In the group studied (n = 230), 135 (59%) were prescribed a statin, with 79 (58%) for primary prevention. Ninety-three (40%) had stage IV cancer. Of the 230 patients, 134 (58%) were recommended SACT. Within the primary prevention group, the median age was 79 years. Twenty-seven patients (34%) had stage III disease, while 36 (46%) had stage IV disease. Thirteen (16%) had diabetes mellitus. The median number of medications was seven (Interquartile range 5). Fifty patients (63%) were recommended SACT. In terms of survival, 31 (50%) were alive at one year, 18 (29%) alive at two years, and 14 (23%) alive beyond two and a half years. Within the stage IV disease group, 59 out of 93 (63%) were receiving statin therapy; 35 (59%) for primary prevention and seven (8%) for diabetes mellitus. Fifty-eight (63%) were recommended SACT. Twenty-four (29%) were alive at one year, 17 (21%) alive at two years, and 13 (16%) alive beyond two and a half years. Statin therapy is prevalent and continues into older age. Available data regarding statin therapy in older adults and survival seen in this study support deprescribing in primary prevention and life-limiting illness, such as stage IV cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To estimate the efficacy of a fluid-based, thin-layer preparation (TP) compared with the conventional Pap (CP) test to detect biopsy confirmed precancerous cervical lesions.Materials and Methods: A total of 10,226 evaluable patients at 10 separate clinical sites were screened for cervical abnormalities using the TP (ThinPrep pap test; Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, MA). Results were compared with an historical control cohort of 20,918 patients from a similar patient population and with a similar patient profile who had received CP screening.Results: The TP significantly increased the detection rate of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and more severe (HSIL+) cytologic results as compared with the CP smear. Overall, the TP method yielded a 59.7% increase in the detection of HSIL+ compared with the CP smear. Overall, the TP method yielded a 59.7% increase in the detection of HSIL+ compared with the conventional method (3.9% vs. 2.4%; p < .001). There was also a significant increase in the detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with TP (p < .01). The rates of cancer, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, and atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance were similar for the TP and CP groups.Conclusions: The overall cytologic detection of HSIL and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with the TP method was significantly increased compared with a control group screened with the CP method. Histologic confirmation showed increased detection, not an increased false-positive cytologic interpretation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine practice patterns of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) 2000 Biennial Meeting participants for management of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS).Materials and Methods: A three-page survey was developed to query participants about their standard practices for managing atypical squamous cells and atypical glandular cells on Pap tests; use of human papillomavirus testing; and use of vaginal estrogen cream in postmenopausal women before follow-up.Results: There were 217 completed surveys (47.0% response rate). Responses of 194 qualified surveys are presented here. For women with first-time ASCUS (unqualified) and no previous history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), 16.4% of respondents would perform colposcopy. For ASCUS (favor squamous intraepithelial lesion [SIL]), a significantly higher percent, 74.9%, would proceed immediately to colposcopy (p < .001). For ASCUS (unqualified or favor SIL) in a woman with a previous history of CIN, 82.7% and 95.5% would perform colposcopy, respectively (p < .001). For a patient with AGUS, 97.5% would perform colposcopy (with or without endocervical curettage or endometrial biopsy). Human papillomavirus testing was seldom used in the management of ASCUS (10.4%) and AGUS (7.8%).Conclusions: Participants at the 2000 ASCCP Biennial Meeting made clear distinctions between ASCUS and AGUS in managing women with abnormalities on Pap, and management was consistent with guidelines published by the ASCCP, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the National Cancer Institute. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: To compare cytology with cervicography in HIV-infected and uninfected adolescent females. METHODS: At the time of analysis, 334 girls aged 13-19 years from 13 U.S. cities were participating in a prospective study of HIV infection. All subjects had cytology and a Cervigram (cervicography) performed at two consecutive visits 6 months apart, referred to as visit (V) 1 and 2. Cervigrams were sent to the parent company for diagnosis and were categorized as: 'negative' or 'positive' (compatible with low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [SIL]). Cytology was considered abnormal if the subject had SIL at either V1 or V2. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of the Cervigram were calculated compared with repeat Papanicolaou (Pap) smears. RESULTS: Two consecutive adequate Pap smears were available for analysis in 200 adolescents; 51% (95% CI, 43-59) of the 142 HIV-positive youth and 19% (95% CI, 9-29) of the 58 HIV-negative youth had SIL on at least one Pap smear (p < .001). A positive Cervigram was observed in 44% (95% CI, 36-53) of the HIV-infected group and 29% (95% CI, 17-41) of the HIV-uninfected group (p =.06). For the HIV-infected group, the sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of the Cervigram to detect SIL were 58% (95% CI, 45-71), 69% (95%CI, 57-80), and 64% (95%CI, 52-77), respectively. For the HIV-uninfected group, the sensitivity, specificity, and PPV were 64% (95% CI, 31-89), 80% (95% CI, 65-90), and 44% (95% CI, 19-68), respectively. The combined sensitivity, using both the Pap smear and Cervigram result from V1 to detect SIL, was 82% (95% CI, 71-91 for HIV+ and 48-98 for HIV-) in both groups. However, the PPV based the performance of the Cervigram in Pap smear-negative women as 33% (95% CI, 17-53) and 15% (95% CI, 2-45) for the HIV-infected and uninfected group, respectively (p = not significant [ns]). CONCLUSIONS: Although the sensitivity of a single Pap smear increased significantly when the Cervigram was used as an adjunct, the low PPV in both HIV-infected and uninfected groups, suggests that cervicography has a limited utility for precancer and cervical cancer screening in high-risk adolescent populations. Copyright Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2003 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To determine interrater variability in classifying cervical biopsies from women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).Materials and Methods: Cervical biopsies performed on women participating in the Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) were read at the six participating sites. A 10% random sample was retrieved and reviewed using standardized terminology by pathologists with a special interest in gynecologic pathology. Results were compared with kappa values and Mantel-Haentzel tests.Results: Biopsies from 288 HIV-seropositive and 24 HIV-seronegative women were reviewed. The weighted kappa value of 0.67 indicated moderate to strong agreement between original and review diagnoses, with a range of 0.54 to 0.84 across sites. No cancers were identified. Significantly more specimens showing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or 3 were identified by review pathologists (p = .02). CIN2 or CIN3 was graded less severely by local pathologists in 18 (51%) of 35 cases, all from HIV-seropositive women. Local pathologists' diagnoses of CIN2 or CIN3 were downgraded by reviewers in 4 of 21 cases (19%). Discrepancies were more common among women with lower CD4 lymphocyte counts.Conclusions: Although discrepancies occur, interrater correlation in the interpretation of cervical biopsies from women with HIV is moderate to strong. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Our intent was to compare the management of patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cytologic screening at an academic center to published guidelines.Study Design: We reviewed the management of 223 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cervical smears. Patients with a history of dysplasia were excluded. The time interval to and nature of follow-up testing was determined, and the influence of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance qualifiers and provider specialty analyzed.Results: Initial follow-up consisted of repeat cytologic examination alone in 94% of cases. Of patients with follow-up, 29% were retested within 2 months and 68% within 4 months. No conclusive differences in management were found by qualifier type or by provider specialty. Subsequent high-grade dysplasia was found in 2.6% of patients.Conclusions: A discrepancy exists between published guidelines and actual management of patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance smears at this medical center. Patients often undergo follow-up testing at shorter intervals than those suggested despite a low likelihood of finding high-grade disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]