1. Beclomethasone dipropionate versus mesalazine in distal ulcerative colitis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.
- Author
-
Biancone, L., Gionchetti, P., Blanco, G. Del Vecchio, Orlando, A., Annese, V., Papi, C., Sostegni, R., D’Incà, R., Petruzziello, C., Casa, A., Sica, G., Calabrese, E., Campieri, M., and Pallone, F.
- Subjects
BECLOMETHASONE dipropionate ,DRUG efficacy ,ULCERATIVE colitis ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Abstract: Background: Topical beclomethasone diproprionate has shown efficacy in ulcerative colitis. Aim: To assess, in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, the tolerability and safety of topical beclomethasone diproprionate (3mg) enema and foam versus mesalazine (2g) enema and foam in mild–moderate distal ulcerative colitis. Patients: In 15 referral gastrointestinal units, 99 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were enrolled. This number was lower than planned according to the statistical analysis, due to a low recruitment rate. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to random preparations (beclomethasone diproprionate enema, beclomethasone diproprionate foam, mesalazine enema, mesalazine foam) once nightly for 8 weeks, with clinical and endoscopical assessment (Disease Activity Index score) at baseline (T0), 4 (T4) and 8 weeks (T8). Results were expressed as median and range (95% confidence interval). The efficacy was assessed by comparing the Disease Activity Index value at T4 and T8 by using the Student''s t-test or the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. Results: Efficacy was comparable in the beclomethasone diproprionate or mesalazine groups at both T4 and T8 (response at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 78% [95% confidence interval 0.6–0.8] versus mesalazine 79% [95% confidence interval 0.6–0.8]; T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 84% [95% confidence interval 0.7–0.9] versus mesalazine 90% [95% confidence interval 0.7–1.0]; p =n.s.; remission at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 24% [95% confidence interval 0.1–0.3] versus mesalazine 28% [95% confidence interval 0.1–0.3]; remission at T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 36% [95% confidence interval 0.2–0.5] versus mesalazine 52% [95% confidence interval 0.3–0.6]; p =n.s.).The Disease Activity Index lowered at T4 and T8 versus T0 in the four groups (T4 versus T0: beclomethasone diproprionate foam Disease Activity Index 2 versus 6 p <0.0001; beclomethasone diproprionate enema 4 versus 6, mesalazine enema 3 versus 6, mesalazine foam 3.5 versus 7, p <0.001 for all three groups; T8 versus T0: p <0.01). The Disease Activity Index lowered at T8 versus T4 in the beclomethasone diproprionate enema and foam (Disease Activity Index: 2 versus 4 and 1 versus 4, respectively; p <0.05) and in the mesalazine enema (Disease Activity Index: 1.5, range 0–4 versus 3, range 0–12; p <0.01), but not in the mesalazine foam group (Disease Activity Index: 1, range 0–9 versus 3.5, range 0–8; p =n.s.). The safety profile was favourable for all groups. Conclusions: Beclomethasone diproprionate and mesalazine enema and foam show a comparable tolerability and efficacy in mild active distal ulcerative colitis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF