Search

Direct‐acting antivirals have proved to be highly efficacious and safe in monoinfected liver transplant (LT) recipients who experience recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, there is a lack of data on effectiveness and tolerability of these regimens in HCV/HIV‐coinfected patients who experience recurrence of HCV infection after LT. In this prospective, multicenter cohort study, the outcomes of 47 HCV/HIV‐coinfected LT patients who received DAA therapy (with or without ribavirin [RBV]) were compared with those of a matched cohort of 148 HCV‐monoinfected LT recipients who received similar treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. HCV/HIV‐coinfected patients had a median (IQR) CD4 T‐cell count of 366 (256‐467) cells/µL. HIV‐RNA was <50 copies/mL in 96% of patients. The DAA regimens administered were SOF + LDV ± RBV (34%), SOF + SMV ± RBV (31%), SOF + DCV ± RBV (27%), SMV + DCV ± RBV (5%), and 3D (3%), with no differences between the groups. Treatment was well tolerated in both groups. Rates of SVR (negative serum HCV‐RNA at 12 weeks after the end of treatment) were high and similar for coinfected and monoinfected patients (95% and 94%, respectively; P= .239). Albeit not significant, a trend toward lower SVR rates among patients with advanced fibrosis (P= .093) and genotype 4 (P= .088) was observed. In conclusion, interferon‐free regimens with DAAs for post‐LT recurrence of HCV infection in HIV‐infected individuals were highly effective and well tolerated, with results comparable to those of HCV‐monoinfected patients. Direct‐acting antivirals against HCV offer a very high and similar efficacy and safety in HIV‐positive and HIV‐negative liver transplant recipients.

Maastricht type 2 donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors suffer sudden and unexpected cardiac arrest, typically outside the hospital; they have significant potential to expand the donor pool. Herein, we analyze the results of transplanted livers and all potential donors treated under our type 2 DCD protocol. Cardiac arrest was witnessed; potential donors arrived at the hospital after attempts at resuscitation had failed. Death was declared based on the absence of cardiorespiratory activity during a 5-min no-touch period. Femoral vessels were cannulated to establish normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which was maintained until organ recovery. From April 2002 to December 2010, there were 400 potential donors; 34 liver transplants were performed (9%). Among recipients, median age, model for end-stage liver disease and cold and reperfusion warm ischemic times were 55 years (49–60), 19 (14–21) and 380 (325–430) and 30 min (26–35), respectively. Overall, 236 (59%) and 130 (32%) livers were turned down due to absolute and relative contraindications to donate, respectively. One-year recipient and graft survivals were 82% and 70%, respectively (median follow-up 24 months). The applicability of type 2 DCD liver transplant was <10%; however, with better preservation technology and expanded transplant criteria, we may be able to improve this figure significantly.

Maastricht type 2 donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors suffer sudden and unexpected cardiac arrest, typically outside the hospital; they have significant potential to expand the donor pool. Herein, we analyze the results of transplanted livers and all potential donors treated under our type 2 DCD protocol. Cardiac arrest was witnessed; potential donors arrived at the hospital after attempts at resuscitation had failed. Death was declared based on the absence of cardiorespiratory activity during a 5‐min no‐touch period. Femoral vessels were cannulated to establish normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which was maintained until organ recovery. From April 2002 to December 2010, there were 400 potential donors; 34 liver transplants were performed (9%). Among recipients, median age, model for end‐stage liver disease and cold and reperfusion warm ischemic times were 55 years (49–60), 19 (14–21) and 380 (325–430) and 30 min (26–35), respectively. Overall, 236 (59%) and 130 (32%) livers were turned down due to absolute and relative contraindications to donate, respectively. One‐year recipient and graft survivals were 82% and 70%, respectively (median follow‐up 24 months). The applicability of type 2 DCD liver transplant was <10%; however, with better preservation technology and expanded transplant criteria, we may be able to improve this figure significantly.

Donors after cardiac death (DCD) suffer irreversible cardiac arrest prior to donation. We describe our liver transplant experience with DCD whose cardiac arrest is unexpected, not following the removal of ventilatory support, whom we maintain with normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (NECMO). A potential donor goes into cardiac arrest outside the hospital and is brought to the hospital under continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The donor is declared dead and placed on a cardiocompressor. Femoral vessels are cannulated and connected to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to establish NECMO. Blood parameters and CPB pump flow are monitored throughout NECMO, which is continued until cold preservation. From April 2002 to May 2006, 10 of 40 potential DCD livers were transplanted. Only one graft was lost to primary nonfunction (PNF) and another to hepatic artery thrombosis. Posttransplant hepatic function was good. Certain parameters, such as CPR and NECMO times, hepatic transaminases during NECMO, and donor age, determined the viability of DCD liver grafts and were used to establish criteria for their acceptance. Though considered marginal, unexpected DCD can represent an important source of viable livers for transplant if strict acceptance criteria are employed and they are maintained with NECMO prior to recovery.

Donors after cardiac death (DCD) suffer irreversible cardiac arrest prior to donation. We describe our liver transplant experience with DCD whose cardiac arrest is unexpected, not following the removal of ventilatory support, whom we maintain with normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (NECMO). A potential donor goes into cardiac arrest outside the hospital and is brought to the hospital under continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The donor is declared dead and placed on a cardiocompressor. Femoral vessels are cannulated and connected to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to establish NECMO. Blood parameters and CPB pump flow are monitored throughout NECMO, which is continued until cold preservation. From April 2002 to May 2006, 10 of 40 potential DCD livers were transplanted. Only one graft was lost to primary nonfunction (PNF) and another to hepatic artery thrombosis. Posttransplant hepatic function was good. Certain parameters, such as CPR and NECMO times, hepatic transaminases during NECMO, and donor age, determined the viability of DCD liver grafts and were used to establish criteria for their acceptance. Though considered marginal, unexpected DCD can represent an important source of viable livers for transplant if strict acceptance criteria are employed and they are maintained with NECMO prior to recovery.