Search

Background: Obesity-associated chronic low-grade inflammation leads to dysregulation of central lipid and glucose metabolism pathways leading to metabolic disorders. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are known to control regulators of metabolic homeostasis. We aimed to assess the relationship of circulating miRNAs with inflammatory modulators and metabolic disorders in pediatric obesity. Methods: From a pediatric cohort with severe obesity (n= 109), clinically thoroughly characterized including diverse routine blood parameters, oral glucose tolerance test, and liver MRI, a panel of 16 circulating miRNAs was quantified using qRT-PCR. Additionally, markers of inflammation TNFα, IL1 receptor antagonist, procalcitonin, CRP, and IL-6 were measured. Results: Markers of obesity-associated inflammation, TNFα, IL-1Ra, and procalcitonin, all significantly correlated with concentrations of miRNAs 122 and 192. Concentrations of these miRNAs negatively correlated with serum adiponectin and were among those strongly linked to parameters of dyslipidemia and liver function. Moreover, miRNA122 concentrations correlated with HOMA-IR. Several miRNA levels including miRNAs 34a, 93, 122, and 192 were statistically significantly differing between individuals with prediabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, metabolic syndrome, or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease compared to the respective controls. Additionally, miRNA 192 was significantly elevated in metabolically unhealthy obesity. Conclusions: A miRNA pattern associated with obesity-associated inflammation and comorbidities may be used to distinguish metabolically healthy from unhealthy pediatric patients with obesity. Moreover, these changes in epigenetic regulation could potentially be involved in the etiology of obesity-linked metabolic disease in children and adolescents.

Abstract: Multi-detector computed tomography (CT) offers new opportunities in the imaging of the gastrointestinal tract. Its ability to cover a large volume in a very short scan time, and in a single breath hold with thin collimation and isotropic voxels, allows the imaging of the entire esophagus with high-quality multiplanar reformation and 3D reconstruction. Proper distention of the esophagus and stomach (by oral administration of effervescent granules and water) and optimally timed administration of intravenous contrast material are required to detect and characterize disease. In contrast to endoscopy and double-contrast studies of the upper GI tract, CT provides information about both the esophageal wall and the extramural extent of disease. Preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma appears to be the main indication for MDCT. In addition, MDCT allows detection of other esophageal malignancies, such as lymphoma and benign esophageal tumors, such as leiomyma. A diagnosis of rupture or fistula of the esophagus can be firmly established using MDCT. Furthermore, miscellaneous esophageal conditions, such as achalasia, esophagitis, diverticula, and varices, are incidental findings and can also be visualized with hydro-multi-detector CT. Multi-detector CT is a valuable tool for the evaluation of esophageal wall disease and serves as an adjunct to endoscopy.

By recognizing the baseline imaging features of high-risk biliary lesions and predisposing conditions that can lead to development of biliary malignancy, radiologists can facilitate early diagnosis and potentially curative management.

The functional liver imaging score is a simple, noninvasive imaging marker that predicted transplant-free survival in patients with advanced, chronic liver disease.

Spontaneous, iatrogenic or surgical perforation of the whole gastrointestinal wall can lead to serious complications, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Optimal patient management requires early clinical appraisal and prompt imaging evaluation. Both radiologists and referring clinicians should recognize the importance of choosing the ideal imaging modality and the usefulness of oral and rectal contrast medium. Surgeons and radiologists should be familiar with CT and fluoroscopy findings of the normal and pathologic anatomy after esophageal, stomach or colon surgery. Specifically, they should be able to differentiate innocuous from clinically-relevant, life-threatening postoperative complications to guide appropriate treatment. Advantages of esophagram, CT-esophagram, CT after rectal contrast enema and other imaging modalities are discussed.

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR imaging can help to diagnose a specific type of hepatocellular adenoma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate gadoxate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in liver transplant recipients with regard to graft function and mortality at 1 year from imaging.

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of a standard and cumulative triple dose of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent in the evaluation of brain metastases using a high-field 3.0 T MR unit versus a standard field 1.5 T MR unit.

Nöbauer-Huhmann IM, Ba-Ssalamah A, Mlynarik V, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Enhancement of Brain Tumors at 3 Tesla Versus 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2002;37114–119.

Trattnig S, Mlynárik V, Huber M, Ba-Ssalamah A, Puig S, Imhof H. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage and evaluation of cartilage disease. Invest Radiol 2000;35595–601.

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic sensitivity of unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and MR imaging with a new superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced contrast agent (SHU 555 A) with biphasic helical computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP) in patients with focal liver lesions. Eighteen patients with a total of 91 (78 malignant, 13 benign) proven liver lesions underwent unenhanced short tau inversion recovery (STIR), T2-weighted (T2-w) TSE, and SHU 555 A-enhanced T2-w turbo spin-echo (TSE) MR imaging and biphasic helical CTAP. The standard of reference was histopathologic analysis of resected specimens in 59 lesions, intraoperative ultrasound with biopsy in 20 lesions, and CT-guided biopsy and follow-up in 12 lesions. Diagnostic performance of the imaging modalities was compared quantitatively and qualitatively by assessing lesion involvement in liver segments. There were 68 lesions detected on unenhanced T2-w TSE, which resulted in a sensitivity of 75%. With the STIR sequence, 76 lesions were detected, for a sensitivity of 84%, and with SHU 555 A-enhanced MRI, 84 lesions were detected, for a sensitivity of 92%. CTAP detected 88 lesions, for a sensitivity of 97%. The accuracy for unenhanced T2-w TSE was 98%, for STIR 99%, for enhanced-MRI 100%, and for CTAP 95%. The specificity was 100% for SHU 555 A-enhanced MRI and 95% for CTAP. SHU 555 A-enhanced MRI was superior to nonenhanced MRI (P < 0.05) and equivalent to CTAP in terms of sensitivity. Due to the absence of false-positive results on SHU 555 A-enhanced MRI, the specificity and accuracy of enhanced MRI were higher than those of CTAP, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.134). J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;11:665–672. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic sensitivity of unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and MR imaging with a new superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)‐enhanced contrast agent (SHU 555 A) with biphasic helical computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP) in patients with focal liver lesions. Eighteen patients with a total of 91 (78 malignant, 13 benign) proven liver lesions underwent unenhanced short tau inversion recovery (STIR), T2‐weighted (T2‐w) TSE, and SHU 555 A‐enhanced T2‐w turbo spin‐echo (TSE) MR imaging and biphasic helical CTAP. The standard of reference was histopathologic analysis of resected specimens in 59 lesions, intraoperative ultrasound with biopsy in 20 lesions, and CT‐guided biopsy and follow‐up in 12 lesions. Diagnostic performance of the imaging modalities was compared quantitatively and qualitatively by assessing lesion involvement in liver segments. There were 68 lesions detected on unenhanced T2‐w TSE, which resulted in a sensitivity of 75%. With the STIR sequence, 76 lesions were detected, for a sensitivity of 84%, and with SHU 555 A‐enhanced MRI, 84 lesions were detected, for a sensitivity of 92%. CTAP detected 88 lesions, for a sensitivity of 97%. The accuracy for unenhanced T2‐w TSE was 98%, for STIR 99%, for enhanced‐MRI 100%, and for CTAP 95%. The specificity was 100% for SHU 555 A‐enhanced MRI and 95% for CTAP. SHU 555 A‐enhanced MRI was superior to nonenhanced MRI (P< 0.05) and equivalent to CTAP in terms of sensitivity. Due to the absence of false‐positive results on SHU 555 A‐enhanced MRI, the specificity and accuracy of enhanced MRI were higher than those of CTAP, but the difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.134). J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;11:665–672. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.