Search

The problem complexity of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) has been raised in the distribution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, which required solid and robust MCDM methods. Compared with other MCDM methods, the fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency (FWZIC) method and fuzzy decision by opinion score method (FDOSM) have demonstrated their solidity in solving different MCDM challenges. However, the fuzzy sets used in these methods have neglected the refusal concept and limited the restrictions on their constants. To end this, considering the advantage of the T-spherical fuzzy sets (T-SFSs) in handling the uncertainty in the data and obtaining information with more degree of freedom, this study has extended FWZIC and FDOSM methods into the T-SFSs environment (called T-SFWZIC and T-SFDOSM) to be used in the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. The methodology was formulated on the basis of decision matrix adoption and development phases. The first phase described the adopted decision matrix used in the COVID-19 vaccine distribution. The second phase presented the sequential formulation steps of T-SFWZIC used for weighting the distribution criteria followed by T-SFDOSM utilised for prioritising the vaccine recipients. Results revealed the following: (1) T-SFWZIC effectively weighted the vaccine distribution criteria based on several parameters including T = 2, T = 4, T = 6, T = 8, and T = 10. Amongst all parameters, the age criterion received the highest weight, whereas the geographic locations severity criterion has the lowest weight. (2) According to the T parameters, a considerable variance has occurred on the vaccine recipient orders, indicating that the existence of T values affected the vaccine distribution. (3) In the individual context of T-SFDOSM, no unique prioritisation was observed based on the obtained opinions of each expert. (4) The group context of T-SFDOSM used in the prioritisation of vaccine recipients was considered the final distribution result as it unified the differences found in an individual context. The evaluation was performed based on systematic ranking assessment and sensitivity analysis. This evaluation showed that the prioritisation results based on each T parameter were subject to a systematic ranking that is supported by high correlation results over all discussed scenarios of changing criteria weights values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The technology deployment in smart e-tourism brings high potential in terms of customer data, events, reservations, and others. It acts as an effective and personalized guide to aid travelers. There is an increasing variety of smart e-tourism apps with multiple categories and criteria, but in terms of decision making, this presents a multicriteria complex problem to determine the best app from a group of available options with high criteria subjectivity. Literature reviews have evaluated and modeled the existing smart e-tourism apps alternatives, but informational uncertainty remains. The fuzzy sets and Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis (MADA) were used to handle the subjectivity issue. However, this process includes levels of uncertainty, which affects the decisions made and still an open issues. Spherical fuzzy rough sets (SFRSs) environment are useful in this situation for resolving fuzziness and ambiguity. This paper proposed a decision modeling approach for smart E-Tourism data management applications based on SFRSs environment. For methodology: firstly, a decision matrix is adopted for 5 different categories of Smart E-tourism's system applications on the basis of the integrated 12 evaluation criteria. Secondly, a new formulation and development formulating a new extension of FWZIC, called a Spherical Fuzzy Rough-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency (SFR-WZIC), for weighting the smart key concept attributes involved in modeling smart e-tourism, whereas a new formulation and development for a new extension of FDOSM, called a Spherical Fuzzy Rough Decision by Opinion Score Method (SFR-DOSM), for modeling the applications of smart e-tourism per each e-tourism category; then, the new developments are integrated. The proposed methods were evaluated using systematic ranking and sensitivity analysis. • A homogeneous SFRS-MCDM framework for benchmarking smart e-tourism applications is developed. • A new formulation of FWZIC and FDOSM based on SFRS are presented. • Systematic ranking and sensitivity analysis assessments were presented to evaluate the robustness of the proposed work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several DataGlove wearable electronic devices based on real-time Sign Language Recognition Systems (SLRSs) have been developed recently to assist the deaf and dumb community in translating hand gestures to their spoken language equivalents. Multidimensional evaluation and benchmarking of these systems are critical for determining the most desirable approach for meeting all essential requirements. However, this process is considered a Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problem due to the presence of several issues, including multiple evaluation criteria, criteria importance and criteria confliction. Hence, the MCDM approach is required to solve these issues. In this study, a new extension of the Fuzzy Decision by Opinion Score Method (FDOSM) for evaluating and benchmarking SLRSs is developed under an Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Set (IVPFS) named IVP-FDOSM. Fundamentally, the methodology includes two phases. In the first phase, a decision matrix is formulated on the basis of identified 'multidimensional criteria of hand gesture recognition and sensor glove perspectives' and 'real-time SLRSs'. The second phase introduces the development of IVP-FDOSM in two stages. The decision matrix is transformed into an opinion matrix in the first stage (data transformation unit). Meanwhile, in the second stage (data-processing unit), the opinion matrix is converted into fuzzy opinion decision matrices with the assistance of three experts by transforming the opinion matrix's linguistic terms to Interval-Value Pythagorean Fuzzy Numbers (IVPFNs). Results indicate the following: (1) individual benchmarking results of real-time SLRS showed high variation (90%) based on the preference of each Decision Maker (DM), with only 10% of preferences being identical. (2) The results of group benchmarking reveal that the 10th real-time SLRS was the optimal one and the 6th was the worst. In addition, the rates of ranking match between the group benchmarking and each DM (first DM, second DM and third DM) were 23%, 37% and 43%, respectively. (3) For the results evaluation, the statistical test-based objective assessment shows that the first group received the lowest mean value (2.80333), while the third group received the highest mean (3.8). These values indicate that the group benchmarked systems resulting from IVP-FDOSM are undergoing a systematic ranking. Furthermore, the comparative analysis reveals that IVP-FDOSM is superior to IVP-TOPSIS and IVP-AHP in terms of ranking and weighting. • An extension of Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Set (IVPFS) for FDOSM is presented. • The proposed extension is used in the evaluating and benchmarking real-time SLRSs. • A decision matrix is proposed based on 'multidimensional criteria of HGR and SG perspectives' and 'SLRSs. • The benchmarked systems are objectively validated based on statistical test method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]