Search

This paper is discussing the current affairs relating to law and management among the construction professionals. The construction professionals are defined as the architect, engineer and quantity surveyor. By doing references through publications, electronic sources and media, the report tried to indicate the scope of the professional registration, services and their professional etiquette in the construction laws perspective. The scope of paper covers the professionals' tasks and responsibilities and applying the concept of endeavour in carrying out their work. It also touches on the acts and rules concern and the relationship profession among the professionals, mainly between the client, contractor and the professionals themselves. The construction professionals are discussed in this paper as the most responsible person in a project especially when technical works are concerned. The expertise of each construction professionals must be carefully exercise as they are answerable to any sinfulness occurred during the constructions. Crime and tort in the professional services are the serious issues to both professionals and the client in construction industry. The negligence for giving advices and carrying out the duty may contribute to the client's economic loss and also to public safety. The results of this paper indicates that the construction professionals must be portray an excellent character as the skillful and technical person, in order to accomplish the main purpose of the construction industry which is to build sustainable construction to both, the client and the end users.. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The New Urbanism is a movement that began among architects in the early 1990s, opening quickly to planners, developers, and municipal officials. It is more than a neo-traditional, discursive effort to reform urban and suburban development in the United States, but also a development effort that has accomplished in excess of 700 neighborhood-scale projects around the United States at last count, slowly but steadily changing the metropolitan landscape.The rise of the New Urbanism is profitably understood as the construction of a fact in Bruno Latour's terms - a process of "translation" that enables the originator of a discovery or innovation to enroll an interested group to apply it and thus reproduce it, while maintaining control of its integrity. Opposition to such a fact must occur in similar fashion: building a group around a compelling counterargument that can be reliably reproduced.This paper explores evidence of opposition to the New Urbanism in the ideologically-identified press, both conservative and liberal. It explains the failure of criticism to produce significant obstacles to the New Urbanism's progress in terms of its failure to build a coherent "counter-fact." This failure is attributed to the necessary complexity and comprehensiveness of the New Urbanism itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The presence of a work of architecture that can be enjoyed by everyone present was not just through the process of creation of an architect. Success or failure of a work is not determined by the level of beauty that had presented or received awards from the groups of architecture. The building that can be accepted by the surroundings and can be enabled by the user in a relatively take a time should be designed through a lot of consideration and the complex design process. The design process is done not only to solve the physical problems in construct of the building, but also solve problems that occur between several parties. Earlier knowledge of all the problems that will arise in the design process is an important thing. Finally, this paper will present the study of many problems that may occur in a design process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Research has found that most bonus plazas in front of Manhattan office buildings are barren, uninviting spaces. But there has been little study of why that is so. Existing explanations suggest this is incidental to other causes-architects slavishly reproducing modernist architectural styles, or developers too cheap to build usable public space. Such explanations are found to be unsupported by the facts. This study of 291 Manhattan bonus plazas and the development process in New York, including site observations, analysis of newly available plaza data, and interviews of architects, planners, and building managers reveals that spaces were made uninviting intentionally, and that it was building developers who wanted the plazas to be inaccessible. Implications for the study and creation of public space are discussed. ..PAT.-Unpublished Manuscript [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modern architecture was pioneered in the 1920s by architects in Central Europe, but it did not become prominent in the United States until the 1950s. This late adoption is explained by the social and spatial transformations of American society. Modern architecture was the ideological expression of the quest of the professional-managerial class for power, symbolizing the rationality and technology that this class believed should rule society in the place of capital. This style was not prominent early in the U.S. because by the 1920s the professional-managerial class had already become integrated into capitalist corporations and hence needed no independent ideological expression of its ambitions. The emerging mass market in America forced architects working for corporations to cater to the demand of working Americans for entertainment in urban buildings to cover over the rationality and technology of their standardized work. After World War II, however, the social and spatial arrangements of classes in America changed. The managerial revolution displaced capitalists and entrepreneurs and gave the professional- managerial class control of corporations. It thus sought to express its governing rationality in sober, modernist headquarters. This architectural style was now accepted in urban centers by working Americans because most had moved to the suburbs, where they used their market power to demand a landscape of consumer diversion that countered and compensated for the symbols of technocratic work downtown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Based on a review on literature that deals with architects' and designers' use of various communication technologies , this paper argues that we currently see a silent revolution regarding the introduction of new information and communication technologies in the construction industry. Regulatory demands for communication formats which ensure more efficiency are met in various ways and with various enthusiasm by architects. However, the evolution of increasingly sophisticated virtual models and environments also means that some architects have begun to embrace new modes of communicating with clients, politicians, contractors, and other actors. This paper argues that the virtual building can be seen as an innovation in the making, where technological closure is bound up with important communication issues. It suggests that we need more empirically based research to understand the implications of the interplay between regulatory demands and user-driven innovation within this field. ..PAT.-Unpublished Manuscript [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tha article presents a research that focuses on interdisciplinary collaboration in an architectural context, more precisely a training project for young architects and engineers named the Wood Construction Challenge. It mentiions about studying the "communicative constitution of organization" that enables a communicational analysis of an interdisciplinary collaboration in an architectural context where the use of objects is at the core of interdisciplinary work.

This article is presented as an exploratory examination of insight that can be brought to the analysis of the activity of design in architect-user interaction from a CA perspective. Observing the activity of design in talk-in-interaction is problematic in this article, and is examined through analyses and with reference to theory. Single case analysis of an extended data extract is presented to explore some actions in talk-in-interaction in which the activity of designing can be seen to be taking place. Significantly, some actions of the users are considered recognisable as producing moves in a design space, from preliminary analyses. ..PAT.-Unpublished Manuscript [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The design process of legal architecture is a rare moment in which architects, city planners, the judiciary, and other interested parties express and negotiate the meaning and future of law, as they attempt to give it material form in a durable, yet adaptable, structure. Here, I investigate discussion and debate at the American Institute of Architects' International Conference of Courthouse Design as the first installment of a project exploring practices and power in the design, construction, and renovation of legal institutions. ..PAT.-Unpublished Manuscript [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]