Community structure and ecosystem function are often influenced by both food web interactions (e.g., competition, predation) and environmental factors (e.g., temperature, oxygen availability). Identifying the drivers of food web interactions and their response to environmental change can therefore shed insights into how communities and ecosystems are regulated, which in turn can benefit the management of valued ecosystem services (e.g., fisheries). Food web interactions in north-temperate reservoirs, which are the focal ecosystems of this research, are thought to be driven primarily by a planktivorous fish, gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum), by its ability to regulate the abundance of organisms at both higher and lower trophic levels. This current conceptualization, however, overlooks the potential role of bottom hypoxia, which is typically extensive during of the spring through summer growing season and can shift the spatial distributions of organisms and subsequently competitive and predator-prey interactions. It also overlooks the role of the vertically migrating macroinvertebrate, Chaoborus, which is tolerant of bottom hypoxia, and highly abundant in north-temperate reservoirs. Large populations of Chaoborus have been shown to limit zooplankton availability to other intermediate consumers (e.g., planktivorous fish) in other ecosystems, and thus have the potential to also influence food web interactions and fish recruitment in north-temperate reservoirs.Currently, the effects of both Chaoborus and bottom hypoxia on food web interactions in north-temperate reservoirs are largely unknown. To better understand the factors that influence food web interactions, energy flow through the ecosystem, and the processes that limit sport fish recruitment, my collaborators and I set out to determine how hypoxia and Chaoborus alter food web structure, function, and dynamics in north-temperate reservoirs. Specifically, we sought to answer: 1) Does north-temperate reservoir food web structure differ between periods of normoxia to hypoxia?; and 2) How do hypoxia and intermediate consumers (i.e., gizzard shad and Chaoborus) combine to influence prey availability to zooplanktivorous fishes? To answer these questions, we developed field studies aimed at improving methods for quantifying food web structure (Chapters 2 and 3), determining how the spatiotemporal distributions of organisms in the food web vary from normoxia to hypoxia (Chapter 4), and evaluating food web interactions from normoxia to hypoxia, with particular attention paid to understanding the potential for Chaoborus to limit zooplankton availability to other secondary consumers such as larval sport fishes (Chapter 5). This research led to many novel insights. First, we found that hydroacoustic estimates of the conventionally accepted driver of food web interactions in north-temperate reservoirs, gizzard shad, were biased high, owing to Chaoborus migrating into the water column and being misconstrued as gizzard shad (Chapter 2). Second, our ability to improve the use of hydroacoustics to estimate gizzard shad (Chapter 3), and simultaneously develop a method to estimate Chaoborus abundance (Chapter 2), allowed us to determine that the spatiotemporal distributions of zooplanktivores changed from normoxia to hypoxia, leading to especially high nighttime spatial overlap among gizzard shad, Chaoborus, and their zooplankton prey when bottom hypoxia is present (Chapter 4). This finding suggests the potential for alternative drivers (besides gizzard shad) of zooplankton prey availability during summer. Finally, our evaluation of food web interactions during normoxia and hypoxia showed that Chaoborus can at times potentially limit zooplankton availability to other fish consumers during the summer hypoxic period, and therefore should also be considered as a driver of food web interactions in north-temperate reservoirs (Chapter 5). Collectively, our findings provide important and novel insights into food web interactions in north-temperate reservoirs, identifying previously unconsidered processes (Chaoborus and bottom hypoxia) that can potentially regulate energy flow and fish recruitment in these ecosystems.